Adaptation of a flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to lignocellulosic inhibitors by cell recycle batch fermentation

Applied Energy

Volumn 102, Issue , 2013, Pages 124-130

  Landaeta, Roberto ^a   Aroca, Germán ^a   Acevedo, Fernando ^a   Teixeira, José A ^b   Mussatto, Solange I ^b  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Bioethanol; Cell recycle batch fermentation; Inhibitors; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALDEHYDES; BIOETHANOL; CORROSION INHIBITORS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FOOD SUPPLY; GLUCOSE; PRODUCTIVITY; TOXIC MATERIALS;

ADAPTATION; BATCH FERMENTATION; CELL RECYCLE; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL YIELD; FERMENTATION MEDIA; GLOBAL PRODUCTION; HYDROXYBENZOIC ACIDS; HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; INHIBITORY COMPOUNDS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC FEEDSTOCKS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC HYDROLYSATES; LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL; MICROBIAL METABOLISM; PARENT STRAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; SYRINGALDEHYDE; VOLUMETRIC PRODUCTIVITY; YEAST METABOLISM; YEAST STRAIN;

YEAST;

BIOFUEL; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FLOCCULATION; HYDROLYSIS; INHIBITOR; METABOLISM; YEAST; ADAPTATION; FOOD SUPPLY; GLUCOSE; GROWTH RATE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EUCALYPTUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84870767120     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.048     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Mussatto S.I., Dragone G., Guimarães P.M.R., Silva J.P.A., Carneiro L.M., Roberto I.C., et al. Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol Adv 2010, 28:817-830.
2. Mussatto S.I., Roberto I.C. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes - a review. Bioresource Technol 2004, 93:1-10.
3. Klinke H.B., Olsson L., Thomsen A.B., Ahring B.K. Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003, 81:738-747.
4. Larsson S., Quintana-Sáinz A., Reimann A., Nilvebrant N.O., Jönsson L.J. Influence of lignocellulose-derived aromatic compounds on oxygen-limited growth and ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2000, 84-86:617-632.
5. Palmqvist E., Almeida J.S., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Influence of furfural on anaerobic glycolytic kinetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 1999, 62:447-454.
6. Liu Z.L., Moon J., Andersh B.J., Slininger P.J., Weber S. Multiple gene-mediated NAD(P)H-dependent aldehyde reduction is a mechanism of in situ detoxification of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 81:743-753.
7. Liu Z.L. Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 90:809-825.
8. Sauer U. Evolutionary engineering of industrially important microbial phenotypes. Adv Biochem Eng 2001, 73:129-169.
9. Çakar Z.P., Seker U.O.S., Tamerler C., Sonderegger M., Sauer U. Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2005, 5:569-578.
10. Gong C., Cao N., Du J., Tsao G. Ethanol production from renewable resources. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 1999, 65:207-242.
11. Verstrepen K.J., Derdelinckx G., Verachtert H., Delvaux F.R. Yeast flocculation: what brewers should know. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2003, 61:197-205.
12. Verstrepen K.J., Klis F.M. Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Mol Microbiol 2006, 60:5-15.
13. Claro F.B., Rijsbrack K., Soares E.V. Flocculation onset in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of ethanol, heat and osmotic stress. J Appl Microbiol 2007, 102:693-700.
14. Sampermans S., Mortier J., Soares E.V. Flocculation onset in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of nutrients. J Appl Microbiol 2005, 98:525-531.
15. Soares E.V., Teixeira J.A., Mota M. Effect of cultural and nutritional conditions on the control of flocculation expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can J Microbiol 1994, 40:851-857.
16. Purwadi R., Taherzadeh M.J., Brandberg T. A possible industrial solution to ferment lignocellulosic hydrolyzate to ethanol: continuous cultivation with flocculating yeast. Int J Mol Sci 2007, 8:920-932.
17. Vicente A., Teixeira J.A., Dluhý M. Increase of ethanol productivity in an airlift reactor with a modified draught tube. Can J Chem Eng 1999, 77:497-502.
18. Xue C., Zhao X.Q., Bai F.W. Effect of the size of yeast flocs and zinc supplementation on continuous ethanol fermentation performance and metabolic flux distribution under very high concentration conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 105:935-944.
19. Lei J., Zhao X., Ge X., Bai F.W. Ethanol tolerance and the variation of plasma membrane composition of yeast floc populations with different size distribution. J Biotechnol 2007, 131:270-275.
20. Xu T., Zhao X., Bai F.W. Continuous ethanol production using self-flocculating yeast in a cascade of fermentors. Enzyme Microb Technol 2005, 37:634-640.
21. Li F., Zhao X., Ge X., Bai F.W. An innovative consecutive batch fermentation process for very high gravity ethanol fermentation with self-flocculating yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009, 84:1079-1086.
22. Teixeira J.A., Sousa M.L., Mota M. Comparative analysis of ethanolic fermentation in two continuous flocculation bioreactors and effect of flocculation additive. Bioproc Eng 1994, 11:83-90.
23. Carvalho G.B., Mussatto S.I., Cândido E.J., Almeida J.B. Comparison of different procedures for the detoxification of eucalyptus hemicellulosic hydrolysate for use in fermentative processes. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2006, 81:152-157.
24. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 1959, 31:426-428.
25. Lin F.M., Tan Y., Yuan Y.J. Temporal quantitative proteomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to a nonlethal concentration of furfural. Proteomics 2009, 9:5471-5483.
26. Taherzadeh M.J. Acetic acid: friend or foe in anaerobic batch conversion of glucose to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae?. Chem Eng Sci 1997, 52:2653-2659.
27. Delgenes J.P., Moletta R., Navarro J.M. Effects of lignocellulose degradation products on ethanol fermentations of glucose and xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis, Pichia stipitis, and Candida shehatae. Enzyme Microb Technol 1996, 19:220-225.
28. Liu Z.L., Slininger P.J., Gorsich S.W. Enhanced biotransformation of furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural by newly developed ethanologenic yeast strains. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2005, 121-124:451-460.
29. Smukalla S., Caldara M., Pochet N., Beauvais A., Guadagnini S., Yan C., et al. FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 2008, 135:726-737.
30. 2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae flocs. Biochem Eng J 1998, 2:35-43.
31. Stratford M. Yeast flocculation: a new perspective. Advances in microbial physiology 1992, vol. 33:1-71. Academic Press, London.
32. Martín C., Marcet M., Almazán O., Jönsson L.J. Adaptation of a recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to a sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate with high content of fermentation inhibitors. Bioresource Technol 2007, 98:1767-1773.
33. Keating J.D., Panganiban C., Mansfield S.D. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnol Bioeng 2006, 93:1196-1206.
34. Liu Z.L., Ma M., Song M. Evolutionarily engineered ethanologenic yeast detoxifies lignocellulosic biomass conversion inhibitors by reprogrammed pathways. Mol Genet Genomics 2009, 282:233-244.
35. Fong S.S., Joyce A.R., Palsson B. Parallel adaptive evolution cultures of Escherichia coli lead to convergent growth phenotypes with different gene expression states. Genome Res 2005, 15:1365-1372.