Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment, genetic background, and adaptedness: A case study with Drosophila

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 840-853

  Wang, Alethea D ^a   Sharp, Nathaniel P ^a   Agrawal, Aneil F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Distribution of fitness effects; Epistasis; Mutation; Selection; Stress

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; EPISTASIS; FITNESS; FLY; HETEROGENEITY; MUTATION; SELECTION;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DISTRIBUTION OF FITNESS EFFECTS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; EPISTASIS; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SELECTION; STRESS;

DISTRIBUTION OF FITNESS EFFECTS; EPISTASIS; MUTATION; SELECTION; STRESS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOTYPE; MUTATION; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84896710368     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12309     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agrawal, A. F., and M. C. Whitlock. 2010. Environmental duress and epistasis: how does stress affect the strength of selection on new mutations? Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:450-458.
2. Burch, C. L., and L. Chao. 2004. Epistasis and its relationship to canalization in the RNA virus φ6. Genetics 167:559-567.
3. Charlesworth, B., and D. Charlesworth. 1998. Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations. Genetica 102-3:3-19.
4. Charlesworth, B., and K. A. Hughes. 2000. The maintenance of genetic variation in life history traits. Pp. 369-392 in R. S. Singh and C. B. Krimbas, eds. Evolutionary genetics from molecules to morphology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
5. Chevin, L.-M., G. Martin, and T. Lenormand. 2010. Fisher's model and the genomics of adaptation: restricted pleiotropy, heterogenous mutation, and parallel evolution. Evolution 64:3213-3231.
6. de Visser, J. A. G. M., and S. F. Elena. 2007. The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and drift. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:139-149.
7. Eyre-Walker, A., and P. D. Keightley. 2007. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:610-618.
8. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. 1st ed. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
9. Hartfield, M., S. P. Otto, and P. D. Keightley. 2010. The role of advantageous mutations in enhancing the evolution of a recombination modifier. Genetics 184:1153-1164.
10. Hillenmeyer, M. E., E. Fung, J. Wildenhain, S. E. Pierce, S. Hoon, W. Lee, M. Proctor, R. P. St Onge, M. Tyers, D. Koller, et al. 2008. The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320:362-365.
11. Ho, E., and A. F. Agrawal. 2012. The effects of competition on the strength and softness of selection. J. Evol. Biol. 25:2537-2546.
12. Jasnos, L., and R. Korona. 2007. Epistatic buffering of fitness loss in yeast double deletion strains. Nat. Genet. 39:550-554.
13. Jasnos, L., K. Tomala, D. Paczesniak, and R. Korona. 2008. Interactions between stressful environment and gene deletions alleviate the expected average loss of fitness in yeast. Genetics 178:2105-2111.
14. Keightley, P. D., and O. Ohnishi. 1998. EMS-induced polygenic mutation rates for nine quantitative characters in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148:753-766.
15. Keightley, P. D., and S. P. Otto. 2006. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443:89-92.
16. Kishony, R., and S. Leibler. 2003. Environmental stresses can alleviate the average deleterious effect of mutations. J. Biol. 2:14.
17. Lalić, J., J. M. Cuevas, and S. F. Elena. 2011. Effect of host species on the distribution of mutational fitness effects for an RNA virus. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002378.
18. Lynch, M. 2007. The origins of genome architecture. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
19. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Bürger. 1995a. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146:489-518.
20. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Bürger. 1995b. Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49:1067-1080.
21. MacLellan, K., L. Kwan, M. C. Whitlock, and H. D. Rundle. 2012. Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 108:203-210.
22. Mallet, M. A., C. M. Kimber, and A. K. Chippindale. 2012. Susceptibility of the male fitness phenotype to spontaneous mutation. Biol. Lett. 8:426-429.
23. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand. 2006a. A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species. Evolution 60:893-907.
24. Martin, G., and T. Lenormand. 2006b. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: a survey in light of fitness landscape models. Evolution 60:2413-2427.
25. Martin, G., S. F. Elena, and T. Lenormand. 2007. Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model. Nat. Genet. 39:555-560.
26. Orr, H. 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution 52:935-949.
27. R Development Core Team, 2012 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
28. Remold, S. K., and R. E. Lenski. 2001. Contribution of individual random mutations to genotype-by-environment interactions in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:11388-11393.
29. Remold, S. K., and R. E. Lenski. 2004. Pervasive joint influence of epistasis and plasticity on mutational effects in Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet. 36:423-426.
30. Roze, D. 2012. Spatial heterogeneity in the strength of selection against deleterious alleles and the mutation load. Heredity 109:137-145.
31. Sanjuán, R., and S. F. Elena. 2006. Epistasis correlates to genomic complexity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:14402-14405.
32. Szafraniec, K., R. Borts, and R. Korona. 2001. Environmental stress and mutational load in diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1107-1112.
33. Thibault, S. T., M. A. Singer, W. Y. Miyazaki, B. Milash, N. A. Dompe, C. M. Singh, R. Buchholz, M. Demsky, R. Fawcett, H. L. Francis-Lang, et al. 2004. A complementary transposon tool kit for Drosophila melanogaster using P and piggyBac. Nat. Genet. 36:283-287.
34. Trindade, S., A. Sousa, and I. Gordo. 2012. Antibiotic resistance and stress in the light of Fisher's model. Evolution 66:3815-3824.
35. Vale, P. F., M. Choisy, R. Froissart, R. Sanjuán, and S. Gandon. 2012. The distribution of mutational fitness effects of phage φ{symbol}X174 on different hosts. Evolution 66:3495-3507.
36. Wang, A. D., N. P. Sharp, C. C. Spencer, K. Tedman-Aucoin, and A. F. Agrawal. 2009. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 174:863-874.
37. Wang, Y., C. Díaz Arenas, D. M. Stoebel, and T. F. Cooper. 2012. Genetic background affects epistatic interactions between two beneficial mutations. Biol. Lett. 9:20120328.
38. Wardlaw, A. M., and A. F. Agrawal. 2012. Temporal variation in selection accelerates mutational decay by Muller's ratchet. Genetics 191:907-916.
39. Whitlock, M. C. 2005. Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1368-1373.
40. Young, J. A., C. P. Yourth, and A. F. Agrawal. 2009. The effect of pathogens on selection against deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 22:2125-2129.