Undergraduate medical students' perceptions on the quality of feedback received during clinical rotations

Medical Teacher

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL.1, 2014, Pages

  Al Mously, Najwa ^a   Nabil, Nihal Mohamed ^a   Al Babtain, Sarah Abdulrahman ^a   Fouad Abbas, Mostafa A ^a  

^a KING SAUD BIN ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EDUCATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SAUDI ARABIA; STANDARDS;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SAUDI ARABIA; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84896270224     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AAMC Medical School Graduation Questionnaire. 2005. [Accessed 5 August 2013] Available from: http://www.aamc.org/data/ gq/allschoolsreport/ 2005.pdf.
2. Allen C. 2002. Peers and partners: A stakeholder evaluation of preceptorship in mental health nursing. Nurse Researcher 9(3):68-84.
3. Al-Haqwi A. 2012. Importance and process of feedback in undergraduate medical education in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 23(5):1051-1055.
4. Al-Haqwi A, Alwahbi A, Abdulghani H, Molen H. 2012. Barriers of feedback in undergraduate medical education: Male students' perspective in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 33(5):557-561.
5. Al-Mously N, Salem R, Al-Hamdan N. 2013. The impact of gender and English language on the academic performance of students: An experience from new Saudi medical school. J Contemp Med Edu 1(3):170-176.
6. Bates J, Konkin J, Suddards C, Dobson S, Pratt D. 2013. Student perceptions of assessment and feedback in longitudinal integrated clerkships. Med Educ 47:362-374.
7. Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE. 2007. To the point: Medical education reviewsproviding feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(6):508-13. (Pubitemid 46836590)
8. Bok H, Teunissen P, Spruijt A, Fokkema J, Beukelen P, Jaarsma D, Vleuten C. 2013. Clarifying students' feedback-seeking behavior in clinical clerkships. Med Educ 47:282-291.
9. Cantillon P, Sargeant J. 2008. Giving feedback in clinical settings. Br Med J 337:1292-1294.
10. Crommelinck M, Anseel F. 2013. Understanding and encouraging feedback- seeking behavior: A literature review. Med Educ 47:232-241.
11. Daelmans HE, Hoogenboom RJ, Donker AJ, Scherpbier AJ, Stehouwer CD, Van Der Vleuten CP. 2004. Effectiveness of clinical rotations as a learning environment for achieving competences. Med Teach 26: 305-312. (Pubitemid 38961355)
12. Edgren G, Haffling AC, Jakobsson U, McAleer S, Danielsen N. 2010. Comparing the educational environment (as measured by DREEM) at two different stages of curriculum reform. Med Teach 32:e233-e238.
13. Eraut M. 2006. Feedback. Learn Health Soc Care 5(3):111-118.
14. Fernando N, Cleland J, McKenzie H, Cassar K. 2008. Identifying the factors that determine feedback given to undergraduate medical students following formative mini-CEX assessments. MedEduc 42:89-95.
15. Haffling A, Beckman A, Edgren G. 2011. Structured feedback to undergraduate medical students: 3 years' experience of an assessment tool. Med Teach 33:e349-e357.
16. Harden RM, Laidlaw JM. 2013. Be FAIR to students: Four principles that lead to more effective learning. Med Teach 35:27-31.
17. Holmboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, Huot SJ. 2004. Feedback and the mini clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 19:558-561. (Pubitemid 38638887)
18. Isaacson JH, Posk LK, Litaker DG, Halperin AK. 1995. Residents' perceptions of the evaluation process. J Gen Inter Med 10(Suppl 4):S89-S90.
19. Kaviani N, Stillwell Y. 2000. An evaluative study of clinical preceptorship. Nurse Educ Today 20:218-226.
20. Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). 2006. [Accessed 20 May 2013] Available from: http://www.lcme.org/ functions. 2006 june.pdf.
21. Liberman S, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. 2005. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach 27(5):470-472. (Pubitemid 41387895)
22. McKimm J. 2009. Giving effective feedback. Br J Hosp Med 7(3):158-161.
23. Norcini J, Burch V. 2007. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 29:855-871.
24. Papa FJ, Aldrich D, Schumacker RE. 1999. The effect of immediate online feedback upon diagnostic performance. Acad Med 74:S16-S18. (Pubitemid 29493326)
25. Wigton RS, Patil KD, Hoellerich VL. 1986. The effect of feedback in learning clinical diagnosis. J Med Educ 61:816-822. (Pubitemid 16003981)
26. William T, Branch Jr MD, Anuradha P. 2002. Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med 77(12):1185-1188.