Wolf social intelligence

Wolves: Biology, Behavior and Conservation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-47

  Packard, Jane M ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84896041659     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (207)

1. Wayne, R.K. and E.A. Ostrander, Lessons learned from the dog genome. Trends in Genetics, 2007. 23(11): 557-567.
2. Miklosi, A., Dog Behaviour, Evolution and Cognition. 2007, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 274.
3. Metz, M.C., et al., Effect of Sociality and Season on Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Foraging Behavior: Implications for Estimating Summer Kill Rate. Plos One, 2010. 6(3).
4. Vucetich, J.A. and E.K. Peterson, Wolf and moose dynamics on Isle Royale, in Recovery of Gray Wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States: An Endangered Species Success Story, A.Wydeven, T.R. van Deelen, and E.J. Heske, Editors. 2009, Springer: New York. 35-48.
5. Mech, L.D., Long term research on wolves in the Superior National Forest, in Recovery of Gray Wolves in the Great Lakes Region of the United States: An Endangered Species Success Story, A.Wydeven, T.R. van Deelen, and E.J. Heske, Editors. 2009, Springer: New York. 15-34.
6. Nowak, S., R.W. Myslajek, and B. Jedrzejewska, Density and demography of wolf, Canis lupus population in the western-most part of the Polish Carpathian Mountains, 1996-2003. Folia Zoologica, 2008. 57(4): 392-402.
7. Holekamp, K.E., S.T. Sakai, and B.L. Lundrigan, Social intelligence in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society BBiological Sciences, 2006. 362(1480): 523-538.
8. Mech, L.D. and J.M. Packard, Possible use of wolf, Canis-lupus, den over several centuries. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 1990. 104(3): 484-485.
9. Mech, L.D., P.C. Wolf, and J.M. Packard, Regurgitative food transfer among wild wolves. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 1999. 77(8): 1192-1195.
10. Packard, J.M., L.D. Mech, and R.R. Ream, Weaning in an arctic wolf pack -behavioral mechanisms. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 1992. 70(7): 1269-1275.
11. Packard, J.M., et al., Causes of reproductive failure in 2 family groups of wolves (canis-lupus). Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie-Journal of Comparative Ethology, 1985. 68(1): 24-40.
12. Seal, U.S., et al., Endocrine correlates of reproduction in the wolf.1. Serum progesterone, estradiol and LH during the estrous-cycle. Biology of Reproduction, 1979. 21(5): 1057-1066.
13. Bernal, J.F. and J.M. Packard, Differences in winter activity, courtship, and social behavior of two captive family groups of Mexican wolves (Canis lupus baileyi). Zoo Biology, 1997. 16(5): 435-443.
14. Mech, L.D. and L. Boitani, Wolf social ecology, in Wolves: Behavior, Ecology and Conservation, L.D. Mech and L. Boitani, Editors. 2003, University of Chicago Press: Chicago. 1-34.
15. Packard, J.M., Wolf behavior: reproductive, social and intelligent, in Wolves: Behavior, Ecology and Conservation, L.D. Mech and L. Boitani, Editors. 2003, University of Chicago Press: Chicago. 35-65.
16. Packard, J.M., Wolves, in Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, M.D. Breed and J. Moore, Editors. 2010, Academic Press: Oxford. 611-620.
17. Harrington, F.H. and C. Asa, Wolf communication, in Wolves: Behavior, Ecology and Conservation, L.D. Mech and L. Boitani, Editors. 2003, University of Chicago Press: Chicago. 66-103.
18. Mech, L.D., The Arctic Wolf: Ten Years with the Pack. 1997, Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Press.
19. Mech, L.D., Possible use of foresight, understanding, and planning by wolves hunting muskoxen. Arctic, 2007. 60(2): 145-149.
20. Mech, L.D., Annual arctic wolf pack size related to arctic hare numbers. Arctic, 2007. 60(3): 309-311.
21. Holekamp, K.E., Questioning the social intelligence hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007. 11(2): 65-69.
22. Barrett, L. and Henzi, The social nature of primate cognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2005. 272(1575): 1865-1875.
23. Fitch, W.T., L. Huber, and T. Bugnyar, Social Cognition and the Evolution of Language: Constructing Cognitive Phylogenies. Neuron, 2010. 65(6): 795-814.
24. Burkart, J.M. and C.van Schaik, Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates? Animal Cognition, 2010. 13(1): 1-19.
25. Peron, F., et al., Cooperative problem solving in African grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). Animal Cognition, 2010. 14(4): 545-553.
26. Holzhaider, J.C., et al., The social structure of New Caledonian crows. Animal Behaviour, 2010. 81(1): 83-92.
27. Heinrich, B., Conflict, Cooperation, and Cognition in the Common Raven, in Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol 43, H.J. Brockmann, et al., Editors. 2011. 189-237.
28. Emery, N.J. and N.S. Clayton, Comparative Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 2009. 60: 87-113.
29. Shettleworth, S.J., The evolution of comparative cognition: Is the snark still a boojum? Behavioural Processes, 2009. 80(3): 210-217.
30. Geffen, E., et al., Size, life-history traits, and social organization in the canidae: A reevaluation. American Naturalist, 1996. 147(1): 140-160.
31. Macdonald, D., S. Creel, and M. Mills, Canid society, in Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids, D. Macdonald and C. Sillero-Zubiri, Editors. 2004, Oxford University Press: Oxford. 85-106.
32. Wayne, R., Recent advances in the population genetics of wolf-like canids, in The World of Wolves: New Perspectives on Ecology, Behaviour and Management, M. Musiani, L. Boitani, and P.C. Paquet, Editors. 2010, University of Calgary Press: Calgary. 15-38.
33. Parker, H.G., A.L. Shearin, and E.A. Ostrander, Man's best friend becomes biology's best in show: genome analyses in the domestic dog, in Annual Review of Genetics, 2010. 44: 309-336.
34. Sakai, S.T., et al., Brain size and social complexity: a computed tomography study in Hyaenidae. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 2010. 77(2): 91-104.
35. Wang, X. and R.H. Tedford, Dogs: Their Fossil Relatives and Evolutionary History. 2008, New York: Columbia University Press.
36. Wang, H.X.J., et al., Evolutionary history, molecular systematics and evoutionary ecology of Canidae, in Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids, D. Macdonald and C. Sillero Zubiri, Editors. 2004, Oxford University Press: Oxford. 39-54.
37. Tseng, Z.J.J. and X.M. Wang, Do convergent ecomorphs evolve through convergent morphological pathways? Cranial shape evolution in fossil hyaenids and borophagine canids (Carnivora, Mammalia). Paleobiology, 2010. 37(3): 470-489.
38. Tseng, Z.J., M. Anton, and M.J. Salesa, The evolution of the bone-cracking model in carnivorans: cranial functional morphology of the Plio-Pleistocene cursorial hyaenid Chasmaporthetes lunensis (Mammalia: Carnivora). Paleobiology, 2010. 37(1): 140-156.
39. La Croix, S., et al., Variation in coyote skull morphology, biomechanics, and feeding behavior due to early bone processing opportunities. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2011. 51: E74-E74.
40. La, C.S., et al., Skull development, functional integration and feeding performance in a top North American carnivore, Canis latrans. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2010. 50: E95-E95.
41. La Croix, S., et al., Ontogenetic relationships between cranium and mandible in coyotes and hyenas. Journal of Morphology, 2010. 272(6): 662-674.
42. Tanner, J.B., et al., Ontogenetic change in skull morphology and mechanical advantage in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Journal of Morphology, 2010. 271(3): 353-365.
43. Adolphs, R., The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 2009. 60: 693-716.
44. Drake, A.G. and C.Klingenberg, Large-scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: Disparity and Modularity. American Naturalist, 2011. 175(3): 289-301.
45. Wozencraft, W.C., Order Carnivora, in Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, D.E. Wilson, and Reeder, D. M., Editors 2005, Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore. 532-548.
46. Fox-Dobbs, K., et al., Carnivore-specific stable isotope variables and variation in the foraging ecology of modern and ancient wolf populations: case studies from Isle Royale, Minnesota, and La Brea. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 2007. 85(4): 458-471.
47. Merkle, J.A., D.R. Stahler, and D.W. Smith, Interference competition between gray wolves and coyotes in Yellowstone National Park. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 2009. 87(1): 56-63.
48. Atwood, T.C. and E.M. Gese, Importance of resource selection and social behavior to partitioning of hostile space by sympatric canids. Journal of Mammalogy, 2010. 91(2): 490-499.
49. Atwood, T.C. and E.M. Gese, Coyotes and recolonizing wolves: social rank mediates risk-conditional behaviour at ungulate carcasses. Animal Behaviour, 2008. 75: 753-762.
50. Arsznov, B.M., et al., Sex and the frontal cortex: a developmental CT study in the spotted hyena. Brain Behavior and Evolution, 2010. 76(3-4): 185-197.
51. Haussler, D., et al., Genome 10K: a proposal to obtain whole-genome sequence for 10,000 vertebrate species. Journal of Heredity, 2009. 100(6): 659-674.
52. Bjornerfeldt, S., M.T. Webster, and C. Vila, Relaxation of selective constraint on dog mitochondrial DNA following domestication. Genome Research, 2006. 16(8): 990-994.
53. Boyko, A.R., The domestic dog: man's best friend in the genomic era. Genome Biology, 2010. 12(2).
54. Udell, M.A.R. and C.D.L. Wynne, Ontogeny and phylogeny: both are essential to human-sensitive behaviour in the genus Canis. Animal Behaviour, 2010. 79(2): E9-E14.
55. Wynne, C.D.L., M.A.R. Udell, and K.A. Lord, Ontogeny's impacts on human-dog communication. Animal Behaviour, 2008. 76: E1-E4.
56. Drake, A.G., Dispelling dog dogma: an investigation of heterochrony in dogs using 3D geometric morphometric analysis of skull shape. Evolution and Development, 2011. 13(2): 204-213.
57. Gacsi, M., et al., Effects of selection for cooperation and attention in dogs. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2009. 5.
58. Hare, B., et al., The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 2002. 298(5598): 1634-1636.
59. Hare, B., et al., The domestication hypothesis for dogs' skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al. (2008) and Wynne et al. (2008). Animal Behaviour, 2010. 79(2): E1-E6.
60. Dorey, N.R., M.A.R. Udell, and C.D.L. Wynne, When do domestic dogs, Canis familiaris, start to understand human pointing? The role of ontogeny in the development of interspecies communication. Animal Behaviour, 2010. 79(1): 37-41.
61. De Meester, R., et al., Critical evaluation of the environment in Belgian dog breeding kennels during the puppies' socialization period. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 2005. 74(5): 364-374.
62. Newberry, R.C. and J.C. Swanson, Implications of breaking mother-young social bonds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008. 110(1-2): 3-23.
63. Howell, T.J. and P.C. Bennett, Puppy power! Using social cognition research tasks to improve socialization practices for domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Veterinary Behavior-Clinical Applications and Research, 2010. 6(3): 195-204.
64. Miklosi, A., Evolutionary approach to communication between humans and dogs. Veterinary Research Communications, 2009. 33: S53-S59.
65. Gacsi, M., et al., Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. Plos One, 2009. 4(8).
66. Hejjas, K., et al., Molecular and behavioral analysis of the intron 2 repeat polymorphism in the canine dopamine D4 receptor gene. Genes Brain and Behavior, 2009. 8(3): 330-336.
67. Rosado, B., et al., Blood concentrations of serotonin, cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone in aggressive dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2010. 123(3-4): 124-130.
68. Szczerbal, I., et al., Cytogenetic mapping and STR polymorphism of two candidate genes (DRD2 and HTRID) for behaviour traits in four canids (short communication). Archiv Fur Tierzucht-Archives of Animal Breeding, 2007. 50(4): 412-417.
69. Lindberg, J., et al., Selection for tameness modulates the expression of heme related genes in silver foxes. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2007. 3.
70. Lindberg, J., et al., Reduced expression of TACI, PENK and SOCS2 in Hcrtr-2 mutated narcoleptic dog brain. Bmc Neuroscience, 2007. 8.
71. Saetre, P., et al., From wild wolf to domestic dog: gene expression changes in the brain. Molecular Brain Research, 2004. 126(2): 198-206.
72. Kubinyi, E., Pongracz, and A. Miklosi, Dog as a model for studying conspecific and heterospecific social learning. Journal of Veterinary Behavior-Clinical Applications and Research, 2009. 4(1): 31-41.
73. Miklosi, A., J. Topal, and V. Csany, Big thoughts in small brains? Dogs as a model for understanding human social cognition. Neuroreport, 2007. 18(5): 467-471.
74. Whiten, A. and C.van Schaik, The evolution of animal 'cultures' and social intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007. 362(1480): 603-620.
75. Pal, S.K., Maturation and development of social behaviour during early ontogeny in free-ranging dog puppies in West Bengal, India. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008. 111(1-2): 95-107.
76. Stahler, D.R., D.W. Smith, and D.S. Guernsey, Foraging and feeding ecology of the gray wolf (Canis lupus): Lessons from Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, USA. Journal of Nutrition, 2006. 136(7): 1923S-1926S.
77. Gese, E.M., Coyotes in Yellowstone National Park: the influence of dominance on foraging, territoriality and fitness, in Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids, D. Macdonald and C. Sillero-Zubiri, Editors. 2004, Oxford University Press: Oxford. 271-283.
78. Carlson, D.A. and E.M. Gese, Reproductive biology of the coyote (Canis latrans): Integration of mating behavior, reproductive hormones, and vaginal cytology. Journal of Mammalogy, 2008. 89(3): 654-664.
79. Kojola, I., et al., Dispersal behavior and the connectivity between wolf populations in northern Europe. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2009. 73(3): 309-313.
80. Adams, L.G., et al., Population dynamics and harvest characteristics of wolves in the Central Brooks Range, Alaska. Wildlife Monographs, 2008(170): 1-25.
81. Sand, H., et al., Effects of hunting group size, snow depth and age on the success of wolves hunting moose. Animal Behaviour, 2006. 72: 781-789.
82. MacNulty, D.R., et al., Predatory senescence in ageing wolves. Ecology Letters, 2009. 12(12): 1347-1356.
83. Peterson, R.O., The Wolves of Isle Royale: A Broken Balance 2007, Ann. Arbor.: University of Michigan Press. 192.
84. Mech, L.D., Breeding season of wolves, Canis lupus, in relation to latitude. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 2002. 116(1): 139-140.
85. Jedrzejewski, W., et al., Territory size of wolves Canis lupus: linking local (Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland) and Holarctic-scale patterns. Ecography, 2007. 30(1): 66-76.
86. Holekamp, K.E., S.T. Sakai, and B.L. Lundrigan, The spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta) as a model system for study of the evolution of intelligence. Journal of Mammalogy, 2007. 88(3): 545-554.
87. Holekamp, K.E., et al., Vocal recognition in the spotted hyaena and its possible implications regarding the evolution of intelligence. Animal Behaviour, 1999. 58: 383-395.
88. Molnar, C., et al., Classification of dog barks: a machine learning approach. Animal Cognition, 2008. 11(3): 389-400.
89. Palacios, V., E. Font, and R. Marquez, Iberian wolf howls: acoustic structure, individual variation, and a comparison with North American populations. Journal of Mammalogy, 2007. 88(3): 606-613.
90. Nowak, S., et al., Howling activity of free-ranging wolves (Canis lupus) in the Bialowieza Primeval Forest and the Western Beskidy Mountains (Poland). Journal of Ethology, 2007. 25(3): 231-237.
91. Gazzola, A., et al., Temporal changes of howling in south European wolf packs. Italian Journal of Zoology, 2002. 69(2): 157-161.
92. Zub, K., et al., Wolf pack territory marking in the Bialowieza primeval forest (Poland). Behaviour, 2003. 140: 635-648.
93. Mech, L.D., Urine-marking and ground-scratching by free-ranging Arctic Wolves, Canis lupus arctos, in summer. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 2006. 120(4): 466-470.
94. Lisberg, A.E. and C.T. Snowdon, Effects of sex, social status and gonadectomy on countermarking by domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behaviour, 2010. 81(4): 757-764.
95. Haase, E., Comparison of reproductive biological parameters in male wolves and domestic dogs. Zeitschrift Fur Saugetierkunde-International Journal of Mammalian Biology, 2000. 65(5): 257-270.
96. Harrington, F.H., Double marking in arctic wolves, Canis lupus arctos: influence of order on posture. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 2006. 120(4): 471-473.
97. Lisberg, A.E. and C.T. Snowdon, The effects of sex, gonadectomy and status on investigation patterns of unfamiliar conspecific urine in domestic dogs, Canis familiaris. Animal Behaviour, 2009. 77(5): 1147-1154.
98. Barja, I., et al., Quantification of sexual steroid hormones in faeces of Iberian wolf (Canis lupus signatus): a non-invasive sex typing method. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2008. 43(6): 701-707.
99. Barja, I., F.J. de Miguel, and F. Barcena, The importance of crossroads in faecal marking behaviour of the wolves (Canis lupus). Naturwissenschaften, 2004. 91(10): 489-492.
100. Barja, I., F.J. de Miguel, and F. Barcena, Faecal marking behaviour of Iberian wolf in different zones of their territory. Folia Zoologica, 2005. 54(1-2): 21-29.
101. Barja, I., G. Silvan, and J.C. Illera, Relationships between sex and stress hormone levels in feces and marking behavior in a wild population of Iberian wolves (Canis lupus signatus). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2008. 34(6): 697-701.
102. Sands, J. and S. Creel, Social dominance, aggression and faecal glucocorticoid levels in a wild population of wolves, Canis lupus. Animal Behaviour, 2004. 67: 387-396.
103. Adachi, I., Cross-modal representations in primates and dogs A new framework of recognition of social objects. Interaction Studies, 2009. 10(2): 225-251.
104. Adachi, I., H. Kuwahata, and K. Fujita, Dogs recall their owner's face upon hearing the owner's voice. Animal Cognition, 2007. 10(1): 17-21.
105. Fatjo, J., et al., Ambivalent signals during agonistic interactions in a captive wolf pack. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2007. 105(4): 274-283.
106. Cipponeri, T. and Verrell, An uneasy alliance: unequal distribution of affiliative interactions among members of a captive wolf pack. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 2003. 81(10): 1763-1766.
107. Cordoni, G., Social play in captive wolves (Canis lupus): not only an immature affair. Behaviour, 2009. 146: 1363-1385.
108. Rutledge, L.Y., et al., Protection from harvesting restores the natural social structure of eastern wolf packs. Biological Conservation, 2010. 143(2): 332-339.
109. Stahler, D.R., D.W. Smith, and R. Landis, The acceptance of a new breeding male into a wild wolf pack. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 2002. 80(2): 360-365.
110. Peterson, R.O., et al., Leadership behavior in relation to dominance and reproductive status in gray wolves, Canis lupus. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 2002. 80(8): 1405-1412.
111. Schmidt, K., et al., Reproductive behaviour of wild-living wolves in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (Poland). Journal of Ethology, 2008. 26(1): 69-78.
112. Habib, B. and S. Kumar, Den shifting by wolves in semi-wild landscapes in the Deccan Plateau, Maharashtra, India. Journal of Zoology, 2007. 272(3): 259-265.
113. Smith, D.W., et al., Wolf-bison interactions in Yellowstone National Park. Journal of Mammalogy, 2000. 81(4): 1128-1135.
114. Nelson, M.E. and L.D. Mech, A 3-decade dearth of deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in a wolf (Canis lupus)-dominated ecosystem. American Midland Naturalist, 2006. 155(2): 373-382.
115. Elgier, A.M., et al., Communication between domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans: dogs are good learners. Behavioural Processes, 2009. 81(3): 402-408.
116. Jakovcevic, A., et al., Breed differences in dogs' (Canis familiaris) gaze to the human face. Behavioural Processes, 2010. 84(2): 602-607.
117. Elgier, A.M., et al., Learning and owner-stranger effects on interspecific communication in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behavioural Processes, 2009. 81(1): 44-49.
118. Smith, B.and C.A. Litchfield, Dingoes (Canis dingo) can use human social cues to locate hidden food. Animal Cognition, 2010. 13(2): 367-376.
119. Wobber, V., et al., Breed differences in domestic dogs' (Canis familiaris) comprehension of human communicative signals. Interaction Studies, 2009. 10(2): 206-224.
120. Range, F. and Z. Viranyi, Development of gaze following abilities in wolves (Canis lupus). Plos One, 2011. 6(2).
121. Topal, J., et al., Response to comments on "Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants". Science, 2010. 329(5988): 2.
122. Marshall-Pescini, S., et al., Comment on "Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants". Science, 2010. 329(5988).
123. Topal, J., et al., Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science, 2009. 325(5945): 1269-1272.
124. Fiset, S., Comment on "Differential Sensitivity to Human Communication in Dogs, Wolves, and Human Infants". Science, 2010. 329(5988).
125. Topal, J., et al., Reproducing human actions and action sequences: "Do as I Do!" in a dog. Animal Cognition, 2006. 9(4): 355-367.
126. Range, F., L. Huber, and C. Heyes, Automatic imitation in dogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010. 278(1703): 211-217.
127. Range, F., Z. Viranyi, and L. Huber, Selective imitation in domestic dogs. Current Biology, 2007. 17(10): 868-872.
128. Yoon, J.M.D. and C. Tennie, Contagious yawning: a reflection of empathy, mimicry, or contagion? Animal Behaviour, 2010. 79(5): E1-E3.
129. Tennie, C., et al., Dogs, Canis familiaris, fail to copy intransitive actions in thirdparty contextual imitation tasks. Animal Behaviour, 2009. 77(6): 1491-1499.
130. Harr, A.L., V.R. Gilbert, and K.A. Phillips, Do dogs (Canis familiaris) show contagious yawning? Animal Cognition, 2009. 12(6): 833-837.
131. Joly-Mascheroni, R.M., A. Senju, and A.J. Shepherd, Dogs catch human yawns. Biology Letters, 2008. 4(5): 446-448.
132. Ward, C., E.B. Bauer, and B.B. Smuts, Partner preferences and asymmetries in social play among domestic dog, Canis lupus familiaris, littermates. Animal Behaviour, 2008. 76: 1187-1199.
133. Mitchell, R.W. and N.S. Thompson, Projects, routines and enticements in doghuman play, in Perspectievs in Ethology, P.P.G. Bateson and R.H. Klopfer, Editors. 1991, Plenum Press: New York. 189-216.
134. McLeod, P.J., Developmental changes in associations among timber wolf (Canis lupus) postures. Behavioural Processes, 1996. 38(2): 105-118.
135. McLeod, P.J. and J.C. Fentress, Developmental changes in the sequential behavior of interacting timber wolf pups. Behavioural Processes, 1997. 39(2): 127-136.
136. Marshall-Pescini, S., et al., Does training make you smarter? The effects of training on dogs' performance (Canis familiaris) in a problem solving task. Behavioural Processes, 2008. 78(3): 449-454.
137. Range, F., et al., The effect of ostensive cues on dogs' performance in a manipulative social learning task. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2009. 120(3-4): 170-178.
138. MacNulty, D.R., L.D. Mech, and D.W. Smith, A proposed ethogram of largecarnivore predatory behavior, exemplified by the wolf. Journal of Mammalogy, 2007. 88(3): 595-605.
139. Peterson, R.O. and Ciucci, The wolf as a carnivore, in Wolves: Behavior, Ecology and Conservation, L.D. Mech and L. Boitani, Editors. 2003, University of Chicago Press: Chicago. 104-130.
140. MacNulty, D.R., et al., Body size and predatory performance in wolves: is bigger better? Journal of Animal Ecology, 2009. 78(3): 532-539.
141. Pal, S.K., Reproductive behaviour of free-ranging rural dogs in West Bengal, India. Acta Theriologica, 2003. 48(2): 271-281.
142. Cordoni, G. and E. Palagi, Reconciliation in wolves (Canis lupus): new evidence for a comparative perspective. Ethology, 2008. 114(3): 298-308.
143. Palagi, E. and G. Cordoni, Postconflict third-party affiliation in Canis lupus: do wolves share similarities with the great apes? Animal Behaviour, 2009. 78(4): 979-986.
144. Bekoff, M., Empathy: Common sense, science sense, wolves, and well-being. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2002. 25(1): 26-+.
145. Bekoff, M. and P.W. Sherman, Reflections on animal selves. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2004. 19(4): 176-180.
146. Tami, G. and A. Gallagher, Description of the behaviour of domestic dog (Canis familiaris) by experienced and inexperienced people. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2009. 120(3-4): 159-169.
147. Bekoff, M., Consciousness and self in animals: Some reflections. Zygon, 2003. 38(2): 229-245.
148. Bekoff, M., Observations of scent-marking and discriminating self from others by a domestic dog (Canis familiaris): tales of displaced yellow snow. Behavioural Processes, 2001. 55(2): 75-79.
149. Berger, J., Carnivore repatriation and holarctic prey: narrowing the deficit in ecological effectiveness. Conservation Biology, 2007. 21(4): 1105-1116.
150. Liley, S. and S. Creel, What best explains vigilance in elk: characteristics of prey, predators, or the environment? Behavioral Ecology, 2008. 19(2): 245-254.
151. Creel, S., et al., Time and space in general models of antipredator response: tests with wolves and elk. Animal Behaviour, 2008. 76: 1139-1146.
152. Mills, K.J., B.R. Patterson, and D.L. Murray, Direct estimation of early survival and movements in eastern wolf pups. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2008. 72(4): 949-954.
153. Mech, L.D., et al., Demographic effects of canine parvovirus on a free-ranging wolf population over 30 years. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 2008. 44(4): 824-836.
154. Brainerd, S.M., et al., The effects of breeder loss on wolves. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2008. 72(1): 89-98.
155. Wabakken, P., et al., Multistage, long-range natal dispersal by a global positioning system-collared Scandinavian wolf. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2007. 71(5): 1631-1634.
156. Linnell, J.D.C., et al., The origins of the southern Scandinavian wolf Canis lupus population: potential for natural immigration in relation to dispersal distances, geography and Baltic ice. Wildlife Biology, 2005. 11(4): 383-391.
157. Gula, R., R. Hausknecht, and R. Kuehn, Evidence of wolf dispersal in anthropogenic habitats of the Polish Carpathian Mountains. Biodiversity and Conservation, 2009. 18(8): 2173-2184.
158. Vonholdt, B.M., et al., The genealogy and genetic viability of reintroduced Yellowstone grey wolves. Molecular Ecology, 2008. 17(1): 252-274.
159. Fredrickson, R.J., et al., Genetic rescue and inbreeding depression in Mexican wolves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007. 274(1623): 2365-2371.
160. Person, D.K. and A.L. Russell, Correlates of mortality in an exploited wolf population. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2008. 72(7): 1540-1549.
161. Tsunoda, H., et al., How does parental role influence the activity and movements of breeding wolves? Journal of Ethology, 2009. 27(1): 185-189.
162. Fernandez, J.M. and N.R. de Azua, Historical dynamics of a declining wolf population: persecution vs. prey reduction. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2010. 56(2): 169-179.
163. Smith, J.E., et al., Evolutionary forces favoring intragroup coalitions among spotted hyenas and other animals. Behavioral Ecology, 2010. 21(2): 284-303.
164. Byrne, R.W. and L.A. Bates, Primate social cognition: uniquely primate, uniquely social, or just unique? Neuron, 2010. 65(6): 815-830.
165. Weckworth, B.V., et al., A signal for independent coastal and continental histories among North American wolves. Molecular Ecology, 2005. 14(4): 917-931.
166. Anderson, T.M., et al., Molecular and evolutionary history of melanism in North American gray wolves. Science, 2009. 323(5919): 1339-1343.
167. Fain, S.R., D.J. Straughan, and B.F. Taylor, Genetic outcomes of wolf recovery in the western Great Lakes states. Conservation Genetics, 2010. 11(5): 1747-1765.
168. Wayne, R. and Hedrick, Genetics and wolf conservation in the American West: lessons and challenges. Heredity, 2011. 107(1): 16-19.
169. Randi, E., Genetics and conservation of wolves Canis lupus in Europe. Mammal Review, 2010. 41(2): 99-111.
170. Vonholdt, B.M., et al., A novel assessment of population structure and gene flow in grey wolf populations of the Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States. Molecular Ecology, 2010. 19(20): 4412-4427.
171. Carroll, C., et al., Defining recovery goals and strategies for endangered species: the wolf as a case study. Bioscience, 2006. 56(1): 25-37.
172. Carroll, C., et al., Impacts of landscape change on wolf restoration success: planning a reintroduction program based on static and dynamic spatial models. Conservation Biology, 2003. 17(2): 536-548.
173. Garrott, R.A., et al., Evaluating prey switching in wolf-ungulate systems. Ecological Applications, 2007. 17(6): 1588-1597.
174. Bradley, E.H., et al., Evaluating wolf translocation as a nonlethal method to reduce livestock conflicts in the northwestern United States. Conservation Biology, 2005. 19(5): 1498-1508.
175. Muhly, T., et al., Livestock husbandry practices reduce wolf depredation risk in Alberta, Canada, in The World of Wolves: New Perspectives on Ecology, Behaviour and Management, M. Musiani, L. Boitani, and P.C. Paquet, Editors. 2010, University of Calgary Press: Calgary. 261-286.
176. Harper, E.K., W.J. Paul, and L.D. Mech, Causes of wolf depredation increase in Minnesota from 1979-1998. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 2005. 33(3): 888-896.
177. Chapron, G., et al., Conservation and control strategies for the wolf (Canis lupus) in Western Europe based on demographic models. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2003. 326(6): 575-587.
178. Demma, D.J. and L.D. Mech, Wolf use of summer territory in northeastern Minnesota. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2009. 73(3): 380-384.
179. Wallach, A.D., et al., More than mere numbers: the impact of lethal control on the social stability of a top-order predator. Plos One, 2009. 4(9).
180. Kitchen, A.M. and F.F. Knowlton, Cross-fostering in coyotes: evaluation of a potential conservation andresearch tool for canids. Biological Conservation, 2006. 129(2): 221-225.
181. Sparkman, A.M., et al., Helper effects on pup lifetime fitness in the cooperatively breeding red wolf (Canis rufus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2010. 278(1710): 1381-1389.
182. Cafazzo, S., et al., Dominance in relation to age, sex, and competitive contexts in a group of free-ranging domestic dogs. Behavioral Ecology, 2010. 21(3): 443-455.
183. Bradshaw, J.W.S., E.J. Blackwell, and R.A. Casey, Dominance in domestic dogsuseful construct or bad habit? Journal of Veterinary Behavior-Clinical Applications and Research, 2009. 4(3): 135-144.
184. Cooper, J.J., et al., Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2003. 81(3): 229-244.
185. Gyori, B., M. Gacsi, and A. Miklosi, Friend or foe: context dependent sensitivity to human behaviour in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2010. 128(1-4): 69-77.
186. Engh, A.L., et al., Patterns of alliance formation and postconflict aggression indicate spotted hyaenas recognize third-party relationships. Animal Behaviour, 2005. 69: 209-217.
187. Drea, C.M. and A.N. Carter, Cooperative problem solving in a social carnivore. Animal Behaviour, 2009. 78(4): 967-977.
188. Wobber, V. and B. Hare, Testing the social dog hypothesis: Are dogs also more skilled than chimpanzees in non-communicative social tasks? Behavioural Processes, 2009. 81(3): 423-428.
189. Kubinyi, E., et al., Social mimetic behaviour and social anticipation in dogs: preliminary results. Animal Cognition, 2003. 6(1): 57-63.
190. Viranyi, Z., et al., Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young humanreared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Animal Cognition, 2008. 11(3): 373-387.
191. Gacsi, M., et al., The effect of development and individual differences in pointing comprehension of dogs. Animal Cognition, 2009. 12(3): 471-479.
192. Macdonald, D. and C. Sillero-Zubiri, eds. Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids. 2004, Oxford University Press: Oxford. 450.
193. Randall, D.A., et al., Fine-scale genetic structure in Ethiopian wolves imposed by sociality, migration, and population bottlenecks. Conservation Genetics, 2010. 11(1): 89-101.
194. Hinton, J.W. and M.J. Chamberlain, Space and habitat use by a red wolf pack and their pups during pup- rearing. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2010. 74(1): 55-58.
195. Ashenafi, Z.T., et al., Behaviour and ecology of the Ethiopian wolf (Canis simensis) in a human-dominated landscape outside protected areas. Animal Conservation, 2005. 8: 113-121.
196. Chavez, A.S. and E.M. Giese, Landscape use and movements of wolves in relation to livestock in a wildland- agriculture matrix. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2006. 70(4): 1079-1086.
197. Blanco, J.C. and Y. Cortes, Dispersal patterns, social structure and mortality of wolves living in agricultural habitats in Spain. Journal of Zoology, 2007. 273(1): 114-124.
198. Frezard, A. and G. Le Pape, Contribution to the welfare of captive wolves (Canis lupus lupus): a behavioral comparison of six wolf packs. Zoo Biology, 2003. 22(1): 33-44.
199. Mech, L.D., What is the taxonomic identity of Minnesota wolves? Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie, 2010. 88(2): 129-138.
200. Jedrzejewski, W., et al., Synthesizing wolf ecology and management in eastern Europe: similarities and contrasts with North America, in The World of Wolves: New Perspectives on Ecology, Behaviour and Management, M. Musiani, L. Boitani, and P.C. Paquet, Editors. 2010, University of Calgary Press: Calgary. 207-233.
201. Smith, D.W., et al., Survival of colonizing wolves in the Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States 1982-2004. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2010. 74(4): 620-634.
202. Marquard-Petersen, U., Reproduction and mortality of the high arctic wolf, Canis lupus arctos, in Northeast Greenland, 1978-1998. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 2008. 122(2): 142-152.
203. Ortolani, A., H. Vernooij, and R. Coppinger, Ethiopian village dogs: behavioural responses to a stranger's approach. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 2009. 119(3-4): 210-218.
204. Hedrick, P.W. and R.J. Fredrickson, Captive breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves. Molecular Ecology, 2008. 17(1): 344-350.
205. Smith, B.and C.A. Litchfield, How well do dingoes, Canis dingo, perform on the detour task? Animal Behaviour, 2010. 80(1): 155-162.
206. Thomson, P.C., The behavioral ecology of dingoes in north-western Australia.4. Social and spatial- organization, and movements. Wildlife Research, 1992a. 19(5): 543-563.
207. Udell, M.A.R., N.R. Dorey, and C.D.L. Wynne, The performance of stray dogs (Canis familiaris) living in a shelter on human-guided object-choice tasks. Animal Behaviour, 2010. 79(3): 717-725.