Analysis of plastid and nuclear DNA data in plant phylogenetics-evaluation and improvement

Science China Life Sciences

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 280-286

  Wang, Wei ^a   Li, HongLei ^a   Chen, ZhiDuan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

combined analysis; incongruence; nuclear DNA; phylogenetics; plastid DNA

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST DNA; PLANT DNA;

CELL NUCLEUS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; PLASTID; PROCEDURES;

CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PHYLOGENY; PLANTS; PLASTIDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84895923654     PISSN: 16747305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-014-4620-7     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. APG III. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot J Linn Soc, 2009, 161: 105-121.
2. Cox C J, Goffinet B, Wickett N J, Boles S B, Shaw A J. Moss diversity: a molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa, 2010, 9: 175-195.
3. Finet C, Timme RE, Delwiche CF, Marlétaz F. Multigene phylogeny of the green lineage reveals the origin and diversification of land plants. Curr Biol, 2010, 20: 2217-2222.
4. Lehtonen S. Towards resolving the complete fern Tree of Life. PLoS ONE, 2011, 6: e24851.
5. Soltis DE, Smith SA, Cellinese N, Wurdack KJ, Tank DC, Brockington SF, Refulio-Rodriguez NF, Walker JB, Moore MJ, Carlsward BS, Bell CD, Latvis M, Crawley S, Black C, Diouf D, Xi Z, Rushworth CA, Gitzendanner MA, Sytsma KJ, Qiu YL, Hilu KW, Davis CC, Sanderson MJ, Beaman RS, Olmstead RG, Judd WS, Donoghue MJ, Soltis PS. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. Am J Bot, 2011, 98: 704-730.
6. Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Chase MW. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature, 1999, 402: 402-404.
7. Yang Y, Zhou ZK. New insights into the species problem. Sci China Life Sci, 2010, 53: 964-972.
8. Shen X, Li X, Sha Z, Yan B, Xu Q. Complete mitochondrial genome of the Japanese snapping shrimp Alpheus japonicus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea): gene rearrangement and phylogeny within Caridea. Sci China Life Sci, 2012, 55: 591-598.
9. Zheng H, Zhuang W. Four new species of the genus Hymenoscyphus (fungi) based on morphology and molecular data. Sci China Life Sci, 2013, 56: 90-100.
10. Li X, Gao H, Wang Y, Song J, Henry R, Wu H, Hu Z, Yao H, Luo H, Luo K, Pan H, Chen S. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Magnolia grandiflora and comparative analysis with related species. Sci China Life Sci, 2013, 56: 189-198.
11. Liu H, Zhang X, Chen Z, Dong S, Qiu Y. Polyphyly of the fern family Tectariaceae sensu Ching: insights from cpDNA sequence data. Sci China Ser C-Life Sci, 2007, 50: 789-798.
12. Rieseberg LH, Soltis DE. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol Trends Plant, 1991, 5: 65-83.
13. Sang T. Utility of low-copy nuclear gene sequences in plant phylogenetics. Crit Rev Biochem Molec Biol, 2002, 37: 121-147.
14. Small RL, Cronn RC, Wendel JF. Use of nuclear genes for phylogeny reconstruction in plants. Aust Syst Biol, 2004, 17: 145-170.
15. Doyle JJ. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one character taxonomy. Syst Biol, 1992, 17: 144-163.
16. Pelser PB, Kennedy AH, Tepe EJ, Shidler JB, Nordenstam B, Kadereit JW, Watson LE. Patterns and causes of incongruence between plastid and nuclear Senecioneae (Asteraceae) phylogenies. Am J Bot, 2010, 97: 856-873.
17. Soltis DE, Kuzoff RK. Discordance between nuclear and chloroplast phylogenies in the Heuchera group (Saxifragaceae). Evolution, 1995, 49: 727-742.
18. Zhaxybayeva O, Lapierre P, Gogarten JP. Genome mosaicism and organismal lineages. Trends Genet, 2004, 20: 254-260.
19. Peng D, Wang XQ. Reticulate evolution in Thuja inferred from multiple gene sequences: implications for the study of biogeographical disjunction between eastern Asia and North America. Molec Phylog Evol, 2008, 47: 1190-1202.
20. Joly S, Heenan PB, Lockhart PJ. A Pleistocene inter-tribal allopolyploidization event precedes the species radiation of Pachycladon (Brassicaceae) in New Zealand. Molec Phylog Evol, 2009, 51: 365-372.
21. Mason-Gamer RJ, Kellogg EA. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst Biol, 1996, 45: 524-545.
22. Wiens JJ. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst Biol, 1998, 47: 568-581.
23. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge A G, Bult C. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics, 1994, 10: 315-319.
24. Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Beta Test Version 40. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 1995.
25. Templeton AR. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution, 1983, 37: 221-244.
26. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molec Biol Evol, 1999, 16: 1114-1116.
27. van der Niet T, Linder HP. Dealing with incongruence in the quest for the species tree: a case study from the orchid genus Satyrium. Molec Phylog Evol, 2008, 47: 154-174.
28. Holder MT, Anderson JA, Holloway AK. Difficulties in detecting hybridization. Syst Biol, 2001, 50: 978-982.
29. Joly S, McLenachan PA, Lockhart PJ. A statistical approach for distinguishing hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. Am Nat, 2009, 174: E54-E70.
30. Hipp AL, Hall JC, Sytsma KJ. Congruence versus phylogenetic accuracy: revisiting the incongruence length difference test. Syst Biol, 2004, 53: 81-89.
31. Kluge AG. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst Zool, 1989, 38: 7-25.
32. Nixon KC, Carpenter JM. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics, 1996, 12: 221-241.
33. Walker JB, Sytsma KJ. Staminal evolution in the genus Salvia (Lamiaceae): molecular phylogenetic evidence for multiple origins of the staminal lever. Ann Bot, 2007, 100: 375-391.
34. Zhang J, Wang J, Xia T, Zhou S. DNA barcoding: species delimitation in tree peonies. Sci China Ser C-Life Sci, 2009, 52: 568-578.
35. Rindal E, Brower AVZ. Do model-based phylogenetic analyses perform better than parsimony? A test with empirical data. Cladistics, 2011, 27: 331-334.
36. Yi T, Miller AJ, Wen J. Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversification of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) in the Northern Hemisphere. Molec Phylog Evol, 2004, 33: 861-879.
37. Wang W, Wang HC, Chen ZD. Phylogeny and morphological evolution of tribe Menispermeae (Menispermaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear sequences. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst, 2007, 8: 141-154.
38. Baum DA, Sytsma KJ, Hoch PC. A phylogenetic analysis of Epilobium (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence. Syst Biol, 1994, 19: 363-388.
39. Willyard A, Wallace LE, Wagner WL, Weller SG, Sakai AK, Nepokroeff M. Estimating the species tree for Hawaiian Schiedea (Caryophyllaceae) from multiple loci in the presence of reticulate evolution. Molec Phylog Evol, 2011, 60: 29-48.
40. Wiens JJ, Kuczynski CA, Stephens PR. Discordant mitochondrial and nuclear gene phylogenies in emydid turtles: implications for speciation and conservation. Biol J Linn Soc, 2010, 99: 445-461.
41. Xiang JQ, Moody ML, Soltis DE, Fan C, Soltis PS. Relationships within Cornales and circumscription of Cornaceae-matK and rbcL sequence data and effects of outgroups and long branches. Molec Phylog Evol, 2002, 24: 35-57.
42. Whiting MF. Long-branch distraction and the strepsiptera. Syst Biol, 1998, 47: 134-138.
43. Lyons-Weiler J, Hoelzer GA, Tausch RJ. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) I: the statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Molec Biol Evol, 1996, 13: 749-757.
44. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool, 1978, 27: 401-410.
45. Swofford DL, Waddell PJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Foster PG, Lewis PO, Rogers JS. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol, 2001, 50: 525-539.
46. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DH, Moritz C, Mable BK, eds. Molecular Systematics. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, 1996. 407-514.
47. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequence: a maximum likelihood approach. J Molec Evol, 1981, 17: 368-376.
48. DeSalle R, Freedman T, Prager EM, Wilson AC. Tempo and mode sequence evolution in mitochondrial DNA of Hawaiian Drosophila. J Molec Evol, 1987, 26: 157-164.
49. Baker RH, DeSalle R. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst Biol, 1997, 46: 654-673.
50. Palmer JD, Jansen RK, Michaels HJ, Chase MW, Manhart JR. Chloroplast DNA variation and plant phylogeny. Ann Missouri Bot Gard, 1988, 75: 1180-1206.
51. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ. Molecular Systematics of Plants II. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
52. Soltis DE, Moore MJ, Burleigh JG, Bell CD, Soltis PS. Assembling the angiosperm tree of life: progress and further prospects. Ann Missouri Bot Gard, 2010, 97: 514-526.
53. Schneider JV, Schulte K, Aguilar JF, Huertas ML. Molecular evidence for hybridization and introgression in the neotropical coastal desert-endemic Palaua (Malveae, Malvaceae). Molec Phylog Evol, 2011, 60: 373-384.
54. Pelser PB, Nordenstam B, Kadereit JW, Watson LE. An ITS phylogeny of Tribe Senecioneae (Asteraceae) and a new delimitation of Senecio L. Taxon, 2007, 56: 1077-1104.
55. Pamilo P, Nei M. Relationship between gene trees and species trees. Molec Biol Evol, 1988, 5: 568-583.
56. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics, 1983, 105: 437-460.
57. Lexer C, Joseph J, van Loo M, Prenner G, Heinze B, Chase MW, Kirkup D. The use of digital image-based morphometrics to study the phenotypic mosaic in taxa with porous genomes. Taxon, 2009, 58: 349-364.
58. Rieseberg LH. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 1997, 28: 289-359.
59. Hardig TM, Brunsfeld SJ, Fritz RS, Morgan M, Orians CM. Morphological and molecular evidence for hybridization and introgression in a willow (Salix) hybrid zone. Molec Ecol, 2000, 9: 9-24.
60. Dobzhansky TH. Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press, 1941.
61. Lihová J, Kučera J, Perný M, Marhold K. Hybridization between two polyploid Cardamine (Brassicaceae) species in northwestern Spain: discordance between morphological and genetic variation patterns. Ann Bot, 2007, 99: 1083-1096.
62. Ortego J, Bonal R. Natural hybridisation between kermes (Quercus coccifera L) and holm oaks (Q ilex L) revealed by microsatellite markers. Plant Biol, 2010, 12: 234-238.
63. Yi T, Miller AJ, Wen J. Phylogeny of Rhus (Anacardiaceae) based on sequences of nuclear Nia-i3 intron and chloroplast trnC-trnD. Syst Bot, 2007, 32: 379-391.
64. Ramdhani S, Barker N, Cowling RM. Revisiting monophyly in Haworthia Duval (Asphodelaceae): incongruence, hybridization and contemporary speciation. Taxon, 2011, 60: 1001-1014.
65. Rieseberg LH, Whitton J, Linder CR. Molecular marker incongruence in plant hybrid zones and phylogenetic trees. Acta Bot Neerl, 1996, 45: 243-262.
66. Chan KM, Levin SA. Leaky prezygotic isolation and porous genomes: rapid introgression of maternally inherited DNA. Evolution, 2005, 59: 720-729.
67. Funk DJ, Omland KE. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2003, 34: 397-423.
68. Petit RJ, Kremer A, Wagner DB. Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in European oaks. Theor Appl Genet, 1993, 87: 122-128.
69. Xiang QY, Manchester SR, Thomas DT, Zhang W, Fan C. Phylogeny, biogeography, and molecular dating of cornelian cherries (Cornus, Cornaceae): tracking Tertiary plant migration. Evolution, 2005, 59: 1685-1700.
70. Page RDM. GeneTree: comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics, 1998, 14: 819-820.
71. Page RDM, Charleston MA. From gene to organismal phylogeny: reconciled trees and the gene tree/species tree problem. Molec Phylog Evol, 1997, 7: 231-240.
72. Rosenberg NA. The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution, 2003, 57: 1465-1477.
73. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. Trends Ecol Evol, 2009, 24: 332-340.
74. Rodrigo AG, Kelly-Borges M, Bergquist PR, Bergquist PL. A randomization test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. New Zeal J Bot, 1993, 31: 257-268.