DNA barcoding: Species delimitation in tree peonies

Science in China, Series C: Life Sciences

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 568-578

  Zhang, Jin Mei ^a,b   Wang, Jian Xiu ^a,b   Xia, Tao ^a,b   Zhou, Shi Liang ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

DNA barcoding; Evolution; Phylogeny; Species concept

Indexed keywords

PAEONIA; PAEONIA DECOMPOSITA; PAEONIA JISHANENSIS; PAEONIA QIUI; PAEONIA ROCKII; PAEONIA SUFFRUTICOSA;

PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PAEONIA; PHYLOGENY;

CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PAEONIA; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 70149117540     PISSN: 10069305     EISSN: 18622798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-009-0069-5     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Hebert P D N, Cywinska A, Ball S L, et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond, 2003, B 270: 313-321.
2. Hebert P D N, Penton E H, Burns J M, et al. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101(41): 14812-14817.
3. Hebert P D N, Stoeckle M Y, Zemlak T S, et al. Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol, 2004, 2(10): 1657-1663.
4. Kress W J, Wurdack K J, Zimmer E A, et al. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2005, 102(23): 8369-8374.
5. Andrews H C. The Botanist's Repository. vol 6, London: T. Bensley, 1804.
6. Fang W P. Notes on Chinese peonies. Acta Phytotax Sin, 1958, 7(4): 297-323, pl LM-LMIL.
7. Rehder A. New species, varieties and combinations from Herbarium and the collections of the Arnold Arboretum. J Arn Arb, 1920, 1: 193-194.
8. Hong T, Zhang J, Li J, et al. Study on the Chinese wild woody peonies (I): new taxa of Paeonia L. sect. Moutan DC. Bull Bot Res (Harbin), 1992, 12(3): 223-234.
9. Hong T, Osti G L. Study on the Chinese wild woody peonies (II): new taxa of Paeonia L. sect. Moutan DC. Bull Bot Res (Harbin), 1994, 14(3): 237-240.
10. Pei Y-L, Hong D-Y. Paeonia qiui-A new woody species of Paeonia from Hubei, China. Acta Phytotax Sin, 1995, 33: 91-93.
11. Shen B. The origin of the traditional Chinese medicine, "Mudanpi"-A new variety of Paeonia. Acta Phytotax Sin, 1997, 35(4): 360-361.
12. Hong D Y. Paeonia rockii and its one new subspecies from Mt. Taibai, Shaanxi of China. Acta Phytotax Sin, 1998, 36(6): 538-543.
13. Hong D-Y, Pan K-Y, Xie Z-W. Yinpingmudan, the wild relative of the King of Flowers, Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews. Acta Phytotax Sin, 1998, 36(6): 515-520.
14. Hong T, Dai Z L. Study on the Chinese wild woody peonies (III): New taxa of Paeonia L. sect. Moutan DC. Bull Bot Res (Harbin), 1997, 17(1): 1-5.
15. Hong D-Y. Paeonia (Paeoniaceae) in Xizang (Tibet). Novon, 1997, 7: 156-161.
16. Hong D-Y. Notes on Paeonia decomposita Hand.-Mazz. Kew Bull, 1997, 52: 957-963.
17. Hong D-Y, Pan K Y, Pei Y L. The identity of Paeonia decomposita Handel-Mazzetti. Taxon, 1996, 45: 67-69.
18. Li J, Chen D, Yu L, et al. A study on taxonomic position of Paeonia ludlowii. Bull Bot Res, 1998, 18(2):152-155.
19. Hong D-Y, Pan K-Y, Yu H. Taxonomy of Paeonia delavayi (Paeoniaceae). Ann Missouri Bot Gard, 1998, 85: 554-564.
20. Stern F C. A Study of the Genus Paeonia. London: RHS, 1946.
21. Pan K Y. Paeonia. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing, Science Press,1979. 27: 37-59.
22. Haw S G, Lauener L A. A revision of the infraspecific taxa of Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews. Edinb J Bot, 1990, 47: 273-281.
23. Ost G L. Tree peonies revisited. The New Plantsman, 1994, 1(4): 195-205, 247.
24. Halda J J. Systematic treatment of the genus Paeonia L. with some nomenclatural changes. Acta Mus Richnov (Sect Nat), 1997, 4(2): 25-32.
25. Wang L. (ed.) Record of Chinese Tree Peony Varieties. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1997.
26. Halda J J, Horacek L. New descriptions and combinations. Acta Mus Richnov (Sect Nat), 1999, 6(3): 234-238.
27. Hong D-Y, Pan K-Y. A revision of the Paeonia suffruticosa complex (Paeoniaceae). Nord J Bot, 1999, 19: 289-299.
28. Hong D-Y, Pan K-Y. Taxonomical history and revision of Paeonia sect. Moutan (Paeoniaceae). Acta Phytotax Sin, 1999, 37(4): 351-368.
29. Haw S G. Tree peonies: a review of their history and taxonomy. New Plantsman, 2001, 8(3): 156-171.
30. Shen B. The study on classification, identification and revision for the medicinal plants of sect. Moutan in Paeonia from China. Li Shizhen Med Materia Media Res, 2001, 12(4): 330-333.
31. Halda J J. The Genus Paeonia. Portland: Timber Press, 2004.
32. Hong D-Y, Pan K-Y, Zhou Z-Q. Circumscription of Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews and identification of cultivated tree peonies. Acta Phytotax Sin, 2004, 42: 275-283.
33. Hong T. Paeonia. In Cheng W C (ed.). Dendrologia Chinensis. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2004. 4905-4821.
34. Sang T, Crawford D J, Stuessy T F. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am J Bot, 1997, 84(9): 1120-1136.
35. Zou Y P, Cai M L, Wang Z P. Systematic studies on Paeonia sect. Moutan DC. based on RAPD analysis. Acta Phytotax Sin, 1999, 37(3): 220-227.
36. Zhao X, Zhou Z-Q, Lin Q-B, et al. Molecular evidence for the interspecific relationships in Paeonia sect. Moutan: PCR-RFLP and sequence analysis of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase (GPAT) gene. Acta Phytotax Sin, 2004, 42: 236-244.
37. Cheng F, Li J. Exportation of Chinese tree peonies (Mudan) and their development in other countries I: cultivated. J Northwest Norm Univ (Natur Sci), 1998, 34(1): 109-116.
38. Hong D-Y, Pan K-Y. Paeonia cathayana D. Y. Hong & K. Y. Pan, a new tree peony, with revision of P. suffruticosa ssp. yinpingmudan. Acta Phytotax Sin, 2007, 45(3): 285-288.
39. Tank D C, Sang T. Phylogenetic utility of the glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase gene: Evolution and implications in Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Mol Phylo Evol, 2001, 19: 421-429.
40. Shaw J, Lickey E B, Beck J T, et al. The Tortoise and the Hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am J Bot, 2005, 92(1): 142-166.
41. Zhou S-L, Renner S S, Wen J. Molecular phylogeny and intra- and intercontinental biogeography of Calycanthaceae. Mol Phylo Evol, 2006, 39: 1-15.
42. Swofford D L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA, 2003.
43. Rozas J, Sanchez-Delbarria J C, Messeguer X, et al. DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics, 2003, 19: 2496-2497.
44. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L. ARLEQUIN, ver 2000. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Dept Of Anthropology and Ecology, University of Geneva, Switzerland, 2000.
45. DeSalle R. Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: response to Rubinoff. Conserv Bio, 2006, 20(5): 1545-1547.
46. Rubinoff D. Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation. Conserv Bio, 2006, 20(4): 1026-1033.
47. Rubinoff D. DNA Barcoding Evolves into the Familiar. Conserv Bio, 2006, 20(5): 1548-1549.
48. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. Are plant DNA barcodes a search for the Holy Grail? Trends Ecol Evol, 2006, 21(1): 1-2.
49. Smith M A, Wood D M, Janzen D H, et al. DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104(12): 4967-4972.
50. Smith M A, Woodley N E, Janzen D H, et al. DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006, 103(10): 3657-3662.
51. Zhou Z-Q, Pan, K-Y, Hong D-Y. Phylogenetic analyses of Paeonia section Moutan (tree peonies, Paeoniaceae) based on morphological data. Acta Phytotax Sin, 2003, 41: 436-446.