Staminal evolution in the genus Salvia (Lamiaceae): Molecular phylogenetic evidence for multiple origins of the staminal lever

Annals of Botany

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 375-391

  Walker, Jay B ^a   Sytsma, Kenneth J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Dorystaechas; Floral evolution; Key innovation; Lepechinia; Melissa; Mentheae; Meriandra; Perovskia; Rosmarinus; Salvia; Staminal morphology; Zhumeria

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

CONFERENCE PAPER; FLOWER; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; SALVIA;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FLOWERS; PHYLOGENY; SALVIA;

DORYSTAECHAS; LAMIACEAE; LEPECHINIA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MELISSA; MELISSA OFFICINALIS; NEPETEAE; PEROVSKIA; ROSMARINUS; ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS; SALVIA; ZHUMERIA;

EID: 34547729636     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl176     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (70)

1. Ahlenslager K. 1984. Systematic studies of Salvia subg. Calosphace sect. Erythrostachys. Masters thesis, University of Montana, USA.
2. Alziar G. 1988-1993. Catalogue synonymique des Salvia L. du monde (Lamiaceae). I.-VI. Biocosme Mesogéen 5 (3-4): 87-136;
3. 6 (1-2, 4): 79-115, 163-204;
4. 7 (1-2): 59-109;
5. 9 (2-3): 413-497;
6. 10 (3-4): 33-117.
7. Baikova E. 2002. Two ways of stamen development in the subgenus Calosphace (Salvia, Lamiaceae). Botanicheskii-Zhurnal-(St.-Petersburg) 87: 71-78.
8. Baikova E. 2004. Structural types and morphogenesis of stamens in the genus Salvia (Lamiaceae). Botanicheskii-Zhurnal-(St.-Petersburg) 89: 881-895.
9. Barraclough TG, Vogler AP, Harvey PH. 1998. Revealing the factors that promote speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 353: 241-249.
10. Baum DA, Sytsma KJ, Hoch PC. 1994. The phylogeny of Epilobium L. (Onagraceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 363-388.
11. Bentham G. 1876. Labiatae. in Bentham, G. and J. D. Hooker. Genera Plantarum 2: 1160-1196.
12. Bokhari MH, Hedge IC. 1971. Observations on the tribe Meriandreae of the Labiatae. Notes Royal Botanical Garden, Edinburgh 31: 53-67.
13. Bokhari MH, Hedge IC. 1976. Zhumeria (Labiatae): anatomy, taxonomy and affinities. Iran Journal of Botany 1: 1-10.
14. Bräuchler C, Meimberg H, Abele T, Heubl G. 2005. A molecular perspective for tribal concepts and generic boundaries in subfamily Nepetoideae. In: XVII International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria.
15. Cantino PD, Harley AM, Wagstaff SJ. 1992. Genera of Labiatae: status and classification. In: Harley RM, Reynolds T, eds. Advances in Labiate science. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 511-522.
16. Claßen-Bockhoff R, Wester P, Tweraser E. 2003. The staminal lever arm mechanism in Salvia - a review. Plant Biology 5: 33-41.
17. Claßen-Bockhoff R, Crone M, Baikova E. 2004a. Stamen development in Salvia: homology reinvestigated. International Journal of Plant Science 165: 475-498.
18. Claßen-Bockhoff R, Speck T, Tweraser E, Wester P, Thimm S, Reith M. 2004b. The staminal lever mechanism in Salvia: a key innovation for adaptive radiation? Organisms Diversity & Evolution 4: 189-205.
19. Conti E, Litt A, Sytsma KJ. 1996. Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: evidence from rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 83: 221-233.
20. Croizat L. 1962. Space, time, form; the biological synthesis. Caracas, Venezuela: published by the author.
21. Epling C. 1938. The Californian salvias. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 25: 95-188.
22. Epling C. 1939. A revision of Salvia, subgenus Calosphace. Beihefte Feddes Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegetabilis 110: 1-383.
23. Epling C. 1944. The living mosaic. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24. Epling C. 1948. A synopsis of the tribe Lepechinae (Labiatae). Brittonia 6: 352-364.
25. Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1995. Testing significance and incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
26. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
27. Fitch WM. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406-416.
28. Givnish TJ, Evans TM, Zjhra ML, Berry PE, Sytsma KJ. 2000. Molecular evolution, adaptive radiation and geographic diversification in the amphiatlantic family Rapateaceae: evidence from ndhF sequence data. Evolution 54: 1915-1937.
29. Gould SJ. 1989. Wonderful life: The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
30. Hart JA. 1983. Systematics and evolution in the genus Lepechinia. PhD dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
31. Hedge IC. 1974a. A revision of Salvia in Africa and the Canary Islands. Notes Royal Botanical Garden, Edinburgh 33: 1-121.
32. Hedge IC. 1974b. A further note on Salvia tetrodonta. Notes Royal Botanical Garden, Edinburgh 33: 295-299.
33. Hedge IC. 1982a. Labiatae. In: Davis PH, ed. Flora of Turkey and the eastern Aegaean Islands, vol. 7, Labiatae. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 000-000.
34. Hedge IC. 1982b. Salvia. In: Rechinger KH, ed. Flora Iranica. vol. 150, Labiatae. Graz: Akademische Druck und Verlags-Anstalt, 000-000.
35. Hedge IC. 1985. Salvia. In: Meikle RD, ed. Flora of Cyprus. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 000-000.
36. Himmelbaur W, Stibal E. 1932-1934. Entwicklungsrichtungen in der Blutenregion der Gattung Salvia L. I-III. Biologia generalis 8: 449-474;
37. 9: 129-150;
38. 10: 17-48.
39. Hipp AL, Hall JC, Sytsma KJ. 2004. Phylogenetic accuracy, congruence between data partitions, and performance of the ILD. Systematic Biology 53: 81-89.
40. Hodges SA. 1997. Floral nectar spurs and diversification. International Journal of Plant Science 158: S81-S88.
41. Hodges SA, Arnold ML. 1995. Spurring plant diversification: are floral nectar spurs a key innovation? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 262: 343-348.
42. Hruby K. 1934. Zytologie und Anatomie der mitteleuropäischen Salbei-Arten. Beihefte Botanisches Centralblatt 52: 298-380.
43. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist FR. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
44. Maddison DR. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
45. Müller H. 1873. Die Befruchtung der Blumen durch Insekten und die gegenseitige Anpassung beider. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.
46. Neissess KR. 1983. Evolutions, systematics and terpene relationships of Salvia section Audibertia. PhD dissertation, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA.
47. Paton AJ, Springate D, Suddee S, Otieno D, Grayer RJ, Harley MM, et al. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of basils and allies (Ocimeae, Labiatae) based on three plastid DNA regions. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 277-299.
48. Pellmyr O, Krenn HW. 2002. Origin of a complex key innovation in an obligate insect-plant mutualism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99: 5498-5502.
49. Peterson K. 1978. Systematic studies of Salvia subgenus Calosphace in section Farinaceae. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, USA.
50. Pobedimova EG. 1954. Labiatae. In: Shishkin BK, ed. Flora of the U.S.S.R., vol. 21, Labiatae. Moscow: 178-260
51. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
52. Rambaut A. 2001. Sequence alignment editor, version 2.0a6. Available online at http://evolve.zoo.ox.ac.uk/.
53. Reith M, Baumann G, Claßen-Bockhoff R, Speck T. 2006. Sharing without mixing? Quantitative analyses of pollen placement on Apis mellifera as a pollinator of Salvia pratensis and Salvia nemorosa. Annals of Botany 96: 000-000.
54. Serna AS, Ramamoorthy TP. 1993. Revision taxonomica de Salvia seccion Sigmoideae. Acta Botanica Mexicana 23: 65-102.
55. Sprengel CK. 1793. Das entdeckte Geheimnis der Natur im Bau und in der Befruchtung der Pflanzen. Berlin: Friedrich Vieweg dem aeltern.
56. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
57. Thimm S, Reith M, Speck T, Claßen-Bockhoff R. 2005. Force measurements in Salvia flowers. In: XVII International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria.
58. Trapp A. 1956. Zur morphologie und entwicklungsgeschichte der staubblatter sympetaler bluten. Botanische Studien 5: 3-93.
59. Turner B. 1996. Synopsis of section Axillaris of Salvia. Phytologia 81: 16-21.
60. Wagstaff SJ. 1992. Phylogeny and character evolution in subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae). PhD thesis, Ohio University, Athens, USA.
61. Wagstaff SJ, Olmstead RG, Cantino PD. 1995. Parsimony analysis of cpDNA restriction site variation in subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae). American Journal of Botany 82: 886-892.
62. Walker JB, Elisens WJ. 2001. A revision of Salvia section Heterosphace in western North America. Sida 19: 571-589.
63. Walker JB, Sytsma KJ, Treutlein J, Wink M. 2004. Salvia is not monophyletic: implications for the systematics, radiation, and ecological specializations of Salvia and tribe Mentheae. American Journal of Botany 91: 1115-1125.
64. Werth E. 1956. Zur Kenntnis des Androeceums der Gattung Salvia und seiner stammesgeschichtichen Wandlung. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 69: 381-386.
65. Wester P, Claßen-Bockhoff R. 2006. Floral diversity and pollen transfer in bird-pollinated Salvia species. Annals of Botany 96: 000-000.
66. Whitehouse E. 1949. Revision of Salvia section Salviastrum. Field and Laboratory 17: 151-165.
67. Wunderlich R. 1967. Ein Vorschlag zu einer naturlichen Gliederung der Labiaten auf Grund der Pollenkorner, der Samenentwicklung und des reifen Samens. Öesterriechisce Botanische Zeitschrift 114: 383-483.
68. Xi-wen L, Hedge IC. 1994. Lamiaceae. In: Zheng-yi W, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China. St. Louis, tMO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
69. Yoder AD, Irwin JA, Payseur BA. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.
70. Zalewska Z. 1928. Recherches sur l'évolution des étamines, considérée du point de vue de leur adaptation à la pollinisation des fleurs de la Sauge (Salvia). Bulletin internacional de l'academie polonaise des sciences et de lettres 3: 133-160.