Collaborative networks and technology clusters - The case of nanowire

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 115-131

  Ozcan, Sercan ^a   Islam, Nazrul ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Clusters; Collaborative networks; Linkages; Nanotechnology; Nanowire; Patent analysis; Systems of innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894970633     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ramsden J.J. What is nanotechnology?. Nanotechnol. Percept. 2005, 1:3-17.
2. Rafols I., Meyer M. Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics 2010, 82(2):263-287.
3. Porter A.L., Youtie J. How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology?. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009, 11(5):1023-1041.
4. Rafols I., Meyer M. How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics 2007, 70(3):633-650.
5. Islam N., Miyazaki K. Nanotechnology innovation system: understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76(1):128-140.
6. Murphy P., Munshi D., Kurian P.A., Lakhtakia A., Bartlett R.V. Nanotechnology, society, and environment. Comprehensive Nanoscience and Technology 2011, 443-476. Academic Press, Amsterdam. D.L. Andrews, G.D. Scholes, G.P. Wiederrecht (Eds.).
7. Mangematin V., Walsh S. The future of nanotechnologies. Technovation 2012, 32(3-4):157-160.
8. Rogers-Hayden T., Pidgeon N. Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: 'upstream' towards sustainability?. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16(8-9):1010-1013.
9. Lue J.T. Physical properties of nanomaterials. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 2007, 10-12. American Scientific Publishers, USA.
10. Lee C., Jeon J., Park Y. Monitoring trends of technological changes based on the dynamic patent lattice: a modified formal concept analysis approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78(4):690-702.
11. Choi C., Park Y. Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76(6):754-768.
12. Firat A.K., Woon W.L., Madnick S. Technological Forecasting - A Review 2008, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
13. Daim T.U., Rueda G., Martin H., Gerdsri P. Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73(8):981-1012.
14. Kostoff R.N., Toothman D.R., Eberhart H.J., Humenik J.A. Text mining using database tomography and bibliometrics: a review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2001, 68(3):223-253.
15. von Wartburg I., Teichert T., Rost K. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Res. Policy 2005, 34(10):1591-1607.
16. Chang K., Chen D., Huang M. The relationships between the patent performance and corporation performance. J. Informetrics 2012, 6(1):131-139.
17. Miyazaki K., Islam N. Nanotechnology systems of innovation - an analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation 2007, 27(11):661-675.
18. Huang Z., Chen H., Yip A., Ng G., Guo F., Chen Z., Roco M.C. Longitudinal patent analysis for nanoscale science and engineering: country, institution and technology field. J. Nanopart. Res. 2003, 5(3-4):333-363.
19. Li X., Chen H., Huang Z., Roco M. Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976-2004). J. Nanopart. Res. 2007, 9(3):337-352.
20. Porter A.L., Youtie J. Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4(9):534-536.
21. Shapira P., Youtie J., Kay L. National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation. J. Technol. Transf. 2011, 36(6):587-604.
22. Schumpeter J. The Theory of Economic Development 1934, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
23. Souder W.E. Improving productivity through technology push. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 1989, 6(4):305-306.
24. Brem A., Voigt K.I. Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management - insights from the German software industry. Technovation 2009, 29(5):351-367.
25. Herstatt C., Lettl C. Management of 'technology push' development projects. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 2004, 27(2/3):155-175.
26. Walsh V. Invention and innovation in the chemical-industry - demand-pull or discovery-push. Res. Policy 1984, 13(4):211-234.
27. Walsh S.T., Kirchhoff B.A., Newbert S. Differentiating market strategies for disruptive technologies. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2002, 49(4):341-351.
28. Chidamber S.R., Kon H.B. A research retrospective of innovation inception and success - the technology-push, demand-pull question. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 1994, 9(1):94-112.
29. Scherer F.M. Demand-pull and technological invention - Schmookler revisited. J. Ind. Econ. 1982, 30(3):225-237.
30. Nemet G. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Res. Policy 2009, 38(5):700-709.
31. Lundvall B. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning 1992, Pinter, London.
32. Liu X., White S. Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context. Res. Policy 2001, 30(7):1091-1114.
33. Guan J., Chen K. Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Res. Policy 2012, 41(1):102-115.
34. Doloreux D. What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technol. Soc. 2002, 24(3):243-263.
35. Yim D.S., Kang B. Policy options for establishing effective subnational innovation systems and technological capacity-building. Asia Pac. Trade Invest. Rev. 2008, 4:115-137.
36. Roper S., Du J., Love J.H. Modelling the innovation value chain. Res. Policy 2008, 37(6-7):961-977.
37. Freeman C. The national system of innovation in historical perspective. Camb. J. Econ. 1995, 19:5-24.
38. Nelson R. National Innovation Systems 1993, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
39. Cooke P., Morgan K. The creative milieu: a regional perspective on innovation. The Handbook of Industrial Innovation 1994, 57-89. M. Dodgson (Ed.).
40. Cooke P., Morgan K. The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions and Innovation 1998, Oxford University Press.
41. Malerba F. Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe 2004.
42. Carlson B., Stankiewicz R. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. J. Evol. Econ. 1991, 1:93-118.
43. Johnson A. Functions in innovation system approaches. Department of Industrial Dynamics 1998, Chalmers University of Technology.
44. Kirat T., Lung Y. Innovation and proximity: territories as loci of collective learning processes. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 1999, 6(1):27-38.
45. Velden T., Haque A., Lagoze C. A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks: mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Scientometrics 2010, 85(1):219-242.
46. Ketels C. The impact of clusters and networks of firms on EU competitiveness. Final Report: Firm networks 2012, Harvard Business School.
47. Mercedes D., Porter M.E., Stern S. Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Census Working Paper 2011.
48. Camarinha-Matos L.M., Afsarmanesh H. Collaborative Networks: Value Creation in a Knowledge Society 2006, 207:26-40. International Federation for Information Processing IFIP.
49. OECD National Innovation System 1997, OECD, Paris.
50. Leydesdorff L., Meyer M. The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics 2003, 58(2):191-203.
51. Paudyal D.R., McDougall K., Apan A. A regional collaborative network to improve spatial information sharing in Australia. 12th Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Association World Conference, Singapore 2010.
52. Porter A.L., Cunningham S.W. Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage 2005, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.
53. Collins K.M.T., Onwuegbuzie A.J., Jiao Q.G. A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. J. Mixed Methods Res. 2007, 1:267-294.
54. Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research 2003, Sage Publications Inc.
55. Porter A.L., Youtie J., Shapira P., Schoeneck D.J. Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2008, 10(5):715-728. Springer, Netherlands.
56. Mogoutov A., Kahane B. Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: a scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Res. Policy 2007, 36:893-903.
57. Scheu M., Veefkind V., Verbandt Y., Galan E., Absalom R., Förster W. Mapping nanotechnology patents: the EPO approach. World Patent Inf. 2006, 28(3):204-211.
58. Dresselhaus M.S., Lin Y.M., Rabin O., Black M.R., Dresselhaus G. Nanowires, Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology 2004, 99-145.
59. Shin M. Efficient simulation of silicon nanowire field effect transistors and their scaling behaviour. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101(2).
60. Sangwoo P., Jose M., Gilbert D., Matthew V.M., Markus K., Mark D., Jack K. High quality silicon oxynitride transition layer for high-k/metal gate transistors. Application Number: 11/729,188. Current U.S. Classification: 438/197 2007.
61. Patolsky F., Zheng G., Lieber C.M. Nanowire sensors for medicine and the life sciences. Nanomedicine 2006, 1(1):51-65.