Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage

Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-384

  Porter, Alan L ^a   Cunningham, Scott W ^b  

^a Search Technology Inc   (United States)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MANAGERS;

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION RESOURCE; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; TECH MININGS; TECHNOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE; TECHNOLOGY MANAGERS; TEXT DATABASE;

COMPETITION;

EID: 84949544947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0471698466     Document Type: Book

References (135)

1. Agichtein, E., Lawrence, S., and Gravano, L. (2004). "Learning to find answers to questions on the web," ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 2.
2. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Akers, L., and Khorsandian, F. (2003). "High Level Overview of Patent Search Types and Approaches," Chicago: PIUG 2003 (Patent Information Users Group).
4. Albright, R.E., and Kappel, T.A. (2003). "Roadmapping in the Corporation," Research Technology Management, Vol. 46, No. 2, 31-40.
5. Altshuller, G. (1990). And Then the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem-Solving, Worcester, MA: Technical Information Center.
6. Anderson, P., and Tushman, M.L. (1990). "Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 604-633.
7. Ascher, W. (1978). Forecasting: An Appraisal for Policy Makers and Planners, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Baldi, P., Fasconi, P., and Smyth, P. (2003). Modeling the Internet and the Web: Probabilistic Methods and Algorithms, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Barabási, A.L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., and Vicsek, T. (2002). "Evolution of the Social Network of Scientific Collaborations," Physica A, Vol. 311, 590-614.
10. Börner, K., Chen, C., and Boyack, K.W. (2003). "Visualizing knowledge domains," Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 37, 179-255.
11. Boyack, K. (2003). "An Indicator-Based Characterization of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences," paper presented at the NAS Sackler Colloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains.
12. Buckley, R. (1998). "Strategic Environmental Assessment," in Porter, A.L., and Fittipaldi, J.J. (Eds), Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, p. 77-86, Atlanta, GA: Army Environmental Policy Institute.
13. Burt, R.S. (1983). Applied Network Analysis: a Methodological Introduction, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Campbell, D., and Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
15. Canter, L.W. (1998). "Methods for Effective Environmental Impact Assessment," in Porter, A.L., and Fittipaldi, J.J. (Eds), Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, p. 58-68, Atlanta, GA: Army Environmental Policy Institute.
16. Carton, L. (2002). "Strengths and Weaknesses of Spatial Language: Mapping Activities as Debating Instrument in a Spatial Planning Process," Washington, DC: XXII International Congress.
17. Chen, C. (2003). Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization, London: Springer.
18. Clarke, D.W., Sr. (2000). "Strategically Evolving the Future: Directed Evolution and Technological Systems Development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 64, 143-153.
19. Coates, J.E. (1999). "Technology Forecasting for Business Clients," Futures Research Quarterly, Fall, 99-109.
20. Coates, V., Faroque, M., Klavins, R., Lapid, K., Linstone, H.A., Pistorius, C., and Porter, A.L., (2001). "On The Future of Technological Forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 67, No. 1, 1-17.
21. Cohen, H.S., Keller, S., and Streeter, D. (1979). "The Transfer of Technology from Research to Development," Research Management, Vol. 22, No. 3, 11-17.
22. Cook, T.D., and Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
23. Cuhls, K., Blind, K., and Grupp, H. (2002). Innovations for Our Future, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
24. Cunningham, S. (1996). The Content Evaluation of British Scientific Research, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sussex: Science Policy Research Unit.
25. Current Science (Vol. 79, No. 5, 10 Sep., 2000). Special section on Scientometrics: http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/Current_Science/
26. Danneels, E. (2002). "The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, 1095-1121.
27. de Bruijn, H., and Porter, A.L. (2004). "The Education of a Technology Policy Analyst-to Process Management," Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. Vol. 16, No. 2, 261-274.
28. Deroian, F. (2002). "Formation of Social Networks and the Diffusion of Innovations," Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 5, 835-846.
29. Devezas, T.C., and Corredine, J.T. (2001). "The Biological Determinants of Long Wave Behavior in Socioeconomic Growth and Development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 68, 1-58.
30. Dror, I. (1989). "Technology Innovation Indicators," R&D Management Vol. 19, 243-249.
31. Dundon, E. (2002). The Seeds of Innovation, New York:AMACOM.
32. Dunphy, S.M., Herbig, P.R., and Howes, M.E. (1996). "The Innovation Funnel," Technological Forecasting & Social Change Vol. 53, 279-292.
33. Edwards, A.W.F. (1992). Likelihood, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Ernst, H. (2003). "Patent Information for Strategic Technology Management," World Patent Information, Vol. 25, No. 3, 233-242.
35. Fischhoff, B. (1998). "Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process," In Löfstedt, R. and Frewer, L. (Eds.), Risk & Modern Society, London: Earthscan Publications, 143-145.
36. Fourez, G.M. (1994). "Technology Assessment: A Pocket Version," Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol. 14, No. 3, 142-143.
37. Gausemeier, J., Fin, A., and Schlake, O. (1998). "Scenario Management: An Approach to Develop Future Potentials," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 59, 111-140.
38. Gaynor, G.H. (2002). Innovation by Design, New York:AMACOM.
39. Georghiou, L., and Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1992). "Evaluation of Socio-economic Effects of Community R&D Programmes-Lessions for Concepts, Methods, and Issues," Research Evaluation, Vol. 2, No. 1, 5-15.
40. Germeraad, P. (2004). "Striking Gold the Patent Way-A Case Study on the Use of Patent Information," Singapore: Europe Asia Patent Information Conference.
41. Glenn, J., and Gordon, T. (2002). Futures Research Methods: Version 2.0, Washington, DC:AC/UNU Millenium Project. http://www.acunu.org/millennium/FRM-v2.html
42. Granstrand, O. (1999). The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
43. Greenspan, A. (1998). "Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan before the Subcommittee of Domestic and International Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking and Financial Services,"Washington, DC: U.S. House of Representatives, February 24, 1998. Available on-line in full text: http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/hh/1998/february/testimony.html
44. Guinee, J.B. (2002). Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
45. Hagedoorn, J., and Duysters, G. (2002). "Learning in dynamic inter-firm networks:The efficacy of multiple contacts," Organizational Studies, Vol. 23, No. 4, 525-548.
46. Hecker, D. (1999). "High-technology employment: a broader view," Monthly Labor Review, June.
47. Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M. (2003)."Market Value and Patent Citations," Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley. http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/
48. Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. (1999). "What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77, March-April, 106.
49. Hicks, D., and Katz, S., (1996). "Systemic Indicators for the Knowledge-Based Economy," Paris: OECD Workshop on New Indicators for the Knowledge-Based Economy.
50. Hicks, D., Breitzman, A., Olivastro, D., and Hamilton, K. (2001). "The Changing Composition of Innovative Activity in the US-a Portrait Based on Patent Analysis," Research Policy, Vol. 30, 681-703.
51. Huber, G.P., and McDaniel, R.R. (1986). "The Decision-Making Paradigm of Organizational Design," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, 572-589.
52. Hullman, A., and Meyer, M. (2003). "Publications and Patents in Nanotechnology:An Overview of Previous Studies and the State of the Art," Scientometrics, Vol. 58, No. 3, 507-527.
53. Kash, D.E., and Rycroft, R.W. (2000). "Patterns of Innovating Complex Technologies: A Framework for Adaptive Network Strategies," Research Policy, Vol. 29, 819-831.
54. Kirby, M.R., Mavris, D.N., and Largent, M.C. (2001). "A Process for Tracking and Assessing Emerging Technology Development Programs for Resource Allocation," AIAA, Paper No. 2001-5280 (http://www.aíaa.org/research.hfm).
55. Klavans, J.L., and Klavans, R.A. (2001). "Do Patent Models Reveal Technological Capabilities," 221st American Chemical Society National Meeting, San Diego, CA.
56. Kongthon, A. (2003). "Deriving Tree-Structured Networks from Technical Text Using Association Rule Mining: Applied to Thailand's R&D," Arthur M. Sackler Colloquium on Mapping Knowledge Domains, National Academy of Sciences.
57. Kostoff, R.N. (2004). "Various reports on Text Mining, Including Text Discovery Processes." http://www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/special/technowatch/
58. Kostoff, R.N., and E. Geisler (1999). "Strategic Management and Implementation of Textual Data Mining in Government Organizations," Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, 493-525.
59. Lane, P., and Makri, M. (2000). "Responding to Diminishing Technological Opportunities: A Socio-Cognitive Model of Science and Innovation," working paper, Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University, College of Business.
60. Lawrence, S. (2001). "Access to Scientific Literature," in Butler, D. (Ed.), The Nature Yearbook of Science and Technology, 86-88, London: Macmillan.
61. Lederberg, J. (1997). "Infectious Disease as an Evolutionary Paradigm," Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 3, No. 4, 417-423.
62. Lemons, K.E., and Porter, A.L. (1992). "A Comparative Study of Impact Assessment Methods in Developed and Developing Countries," Impact Assessment Bulletin, Vol. 10, No. 3, 57-65.
63. Lihtenthaler, E. (2003). "Third Generation Management of Technology Intelligence Processes," R&D Management, Vol. 33, No. 4, 361-375.
64. Linstone, H.A. (1999). Decision Making for Technology Executives: Using Multiple Perspectives to Improve Performance, Boston, MA: Artech House.
65. Linstone, H.A., (2002). "Corporate Planning, Forecasting, and the Long Wave," Futures, Vol. 34, 317-336.
66. Mahajan, V., and Muller, E. (1996). "Timing, Diffusion, and Substitution of Successive Generations of Technological Innovations: The IBM Mainframe Case," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 51, 109-142.
67. Mansfield, E. (1981). "How Economists See R&D," Harvard Business Review, Nov.-Dec., 98-106.
68. March, J.G. (1991). "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, 71-81.
69. Marchau, V.A.W.J. (2000). Technology Assessment of Automated Vehicle Guidance, Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press.
70. Martin, B.R., and Irvine, J. (1989). Research Foresight: Creating the Future, New York: St. Martin's Press.
71. Martino, J.P. (1993). Technological Forecasting for Decision Making, third edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72. McLachlan, G., and Peel, D. (2002). Finite Mixture Models, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
73. Metcalfe, J.S. (1988). "The Diffusion of Innovations: An Interpretive Survey," in Dorsi, G., Freeman C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, pp. 560-589, London: Pinter.
74. Michaels, J.V. (1996). Technical Risk Management, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
75. Millson, M.R., Raj, S.P., and Wilemon, D. (1992). "A Survey of Major Approaches for Accelerating New Product Development," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 9, 53-69.
76. Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Theoret, A. (1976). "Structure of Unstructured Decision Processes," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 246-275.
77. Modis, T. (1993). "Technology Substitutions in the Computer Industry," Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 43, 157-167.
78. Mogee, M. (1993). "Educating Innovation Mangers: Strategic Issues for Business and Higher Education," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 40, No. 4, 410-417.
79. Mogee, M.E. (2003). "Integrating Patent Analysis and Technology Intelligence Techniques: A Case Study," Chicago, IL: Patent Information Users Group.
80. Mohrle, M.G. (2000). TRIZ-based Competitor Analyses, Ninth International Conference on Management of Technology, Miami, FL: International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT).
81. Naisbitt, J. and Aburdene, P. (1991). Megatrends 2000, New York: Morrow Avon.
82. Narin, F., Alber, M.B., and Smith, V.M. (1992). "Technology Indicators in Strategic Planning," Science and Public Policy, Dec., 369-381.
83. Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., and Olivastro, D. (1997). "The Increasing Linkage Between U.S. Technology and Public Science," Research Policy, Vol. 26, 317-330.
84. Narin, F., Thomas, P., and Breitzman, A., (2001). "Using Patent Indicators to Predict Stock Portfolio Performance," in Berman, B. (Ed.), From Ideas to Assets: Investing Wisely in Intellectual Property, pp. 293-308, New York:Wiley.
85. National Science Board (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators-2002, Arlington, VA: U.S. National Science Foundation.
86. Newman, N.C., Porter, A.L., and Yang, J. (2001). Information Professionals: Changing Tools, Changing Roles, Information Outlook, Vol. 5, No. 3, 24-30.
87. OECD (2003). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
88. Office of Technology Assessment (1986). Research Funding as an Investment: Can We Measure the Returns? A Technical Memorandum, Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-Tech Mining-SET-36.
89. Ortt, J.R., and van der Duin, P.A. (2004). Generations of R&D Management: A Context Dependent Evolution of Best Practices, Delft, The Netherlands: Technical University of Delft.
90. Pilkington, A. (2003). Technology Commercialization: Patent Portfolio Alignment and the Fuel Cell, PICMET-Portland International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management, Portland, OR.
91. Popescul, A., Unger, L.H., Pennock, D.M., and Lawrence, S. (2001). "Probabilistic Models for Unified Collaborative and Content-Based Recommendation in Sparse-Data Environments," Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
92. Porter, A.L. (2002). "Text Mining for Technology Foresight," in Glenn, J., and Gordon, T., Futures Research Methods, New York: American Council for the United Nations.
93. Porter, A.L. (2003). "Iraqi Engineering:Where Has All the Research Gone?," Science and Public Policy, Vol. 30, No. 2, 97-105.
94. Porter, A.L., and Cunningham, S.W. (1995). "Whither Nanotechnology? A Bibliometric Study," Foresight Update, Vol. 21, 12-15.
95. Porter, A.L., and Fittipaldi, J.J. (eds.) (1998). Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, Atlanta, GA: Army Environmental Policy Institute.
96. Porter, A.L., Kongthon, A., Lu, J.-C. (2002). "Research Profiling: Improving the Literature Review," Scientometrics, Vol. 53, 351-370.
97. Porter, A.L., and Newman. N.C. (2001). "Why Don't Managers Want our Technological Intelligence? And What Can We Do about it?" Seattle, WA: Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals-SCIP.
98. Porter, A.L., Rossini, F.A., Carpenter, S.R., and Roper, A.T. (1980). A Guidebook for Technology Assessment and Impact Analysis, New York: North-Holland.
99. Porter, A.L., and Schoeneck, D. (2000). "Mining Electronic R&D Information in Support of Resource Management," Bellingham, WA: 8th International Symposium on Society and Resource Management.
100. Porter, A.L., Roper, A.T., Mason, T.W., Rossini, F.A., and Banks, J. (1991). Forecasting and Management of Technology, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
101. Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.
102. Power, D.J. (2002). Decision Support Systems, Concepts and Resources for Managers. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
103. Price, D.J. (1963). Little Science, Big Science, New York: Columbia University Press.
104. Rasmussen, J. (1997). "Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem," Safety Science, Vol. 27, No. 2-3, 183-213.
105. Rivette, K.G., and Kline, D. (2000). Rembrandts in the Attic, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
106. Rossini, F.A., Porter, A.L., Jacobs, C.C., and Abraham, D.S. (1988). "Trends in Computer Use in Industrial R & D," Research/Technology Management, Vol. 31, 36-41, (Sep/Oct).
107. Ross, S. (2002). Probability Models: Eighth Edition, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
108. Rouse, W.B. (1994). Best Laid Plans, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
109. Saaty, T.L. (2001). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Multicriteria Decision Making: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation (revised edition), Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
110. Savransky, S.D. (2000). Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to Triz Methodology of Inventive Problem-Solving, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
111. Smith, C.G. (1992). "Understanding Technology Substitution: Generic Types, Substitution Dynamics and Influence Strategies," Journal of Engineering/Technology Management, Vol. 9, 279-302.
112. Souder, W.E., Nashar, A.S., and Padmanabhan, V. (1990). "A Guide to the Best Technology Transfer Practices," Technology Transfer (Winter-Spring), 5-16.
113. Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., and Kumar, V. (2000). "A Comparison of Document Clustering Techniques," Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Technical Report #00-034. http://www.cs.umn.edu/tech_reports/.
114. Stuart, T., and Sorenson, O. (2003). "The Geography of Opportunity: Spatial Heterogeneity in Founding Rates and the Performance of Biotechnology Firms," Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 2, 229-253.
115. Swanson, D.R., and Smalheiser, N.R. (1997). "An Interactive System for Finding Complementary Literatures: a Stimulus to Scientific Discovery," Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 91, No. 2, 183-203.
116. Tassey, G. (1999). R&D Trends in the U.S. Economy: Strategies and Policy Implications, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
117. Technology Futures Analysis Methods Working Group (2004). "Technology Futures Analysis: Toward Integration of the Field & New Methods," Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 71, No. 3, 287-303.
118. Teichert, T., and Mittermayer, M.-A. (2002) "Text Mining for Technology Monitoring," IEEE IEMC 2002, 596-601.
119. Terninko, J., Zusman, A., and Zlotin, B. (1998). Systematic Innovation: An Introduction to TRIZ, Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
120. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., and Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, Chichester, UK:Wiley.
121. Trippe, A. (2003a). "Patent Analysis: The Once and Future Discipline," Chicago, IL: Patent Information Users Group.
122. Trippe, A. (2003b in press). "Patinformatics:Tasks to tools,"World Patent Information, Vol. 25, Issue 3, 211-221.
123. van Bueren, E.M., Klijn, E.H., and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2003). "Dealing with Wicked Problems in networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective," Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, Vol. 13, No. 2, 193-213.
124. van de Gronden, E.D., van Haeren, J.J.F.M., and Roos, E. (1994). "Use and Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessments in Decision Making," Zoetermeer, The Netherlands: Netherlands Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and the Environment.
125. Van Raan, A.F.J. (Ed.) (1988). Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science & Technology, Dordrecht: North Holland. See also website: http://www.cwts.nl/
126. Wall, L.T., Christiansen, T., and Orwant, J. (2000). Programming Perl, Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
127. Waterland Neeltje Jans (2000). The Delta Project, Burgh-Haamstede, The Netherlands: Waterland Neeltje Jans.
128. Watts, R. J. (2001). "Knowledge Discovery Using the Tech OASIS: Meeting the Information Infrastructure Needs," Portland, OR: Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology.
129. Watts, R.J., and Porter, A.L. (1997). "Innovation Forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 56, 25-47.
130. Watts, R.W., and Porter, A.L. (2003). " R&D Cluster Quality Measures and Technology Maturity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 70, No. 8, 735-758.
131. Webster, R. (1998). "Methods for Environmental Impact Assessment: Selecting a Model and Approach," in Porter, A.L., and Fittipaldi, J.J. (Eds), Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, 119-126, Atlanta, GA: Army Environmental Policy Institute.
132. Xu, G. (2003). "Information for Corporate IP Management," Chicago, IL: Patent Information Users Group.
133. Yardley, H.O. (1957). The Education of a Poker Player, New York: Simon and Schuster.
134. Zhu, D., and Porter, A.L. (2002). "Automated Extraction and Visualization of Information for Technological Intelligence and Forecasting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 69, 495-506.
135. Zhu, D., Porter, A.L., Cunningham, S.W., Carlisle, J., and Nayak, A. (1999). "A Process for Mining Science & Technology Documents Databases, Illustrated for the Case of 'Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining'", Ciencia da Informacao, Vol. 28, No. 1, 1-8.