The future of nanotechnologies

Technovation

Volumn 32, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 157-160

  Mangematin, Vincent ^a   Walsh, Steve ^b  

^a GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Commercialization; Convergence; General purpose technology; Hybridization; Nanotechnology; Pan industrial

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; SOCIAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

COMMERCIALIZATION; CONVERGENCE; GENERAL PURPOSE TECHNOLOGIES; HYBRIDIZATION; PAN INDUSTRIALS;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84857373454     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (64)

1. S. Allan, A. Anderson, and A. Petersen Framing risk: nanotechnologies in the news Journal of Risk Research 13 1 2010 29 44
2. M. Allarakhia, and S. Walsh Managing knowledge assets under conditions of radical change: the case of the pharmaceutical industry Technovation 31 2/3 2011 105 117
3. M. Allarakhia, and S. Walsh Analyzing and organizing nanotechnology development: application of the institutional analysis development framework to nanotechnology consortia Technovation 32 2012 2
4. M.M. Andersen Silent innovation: corporate strategizing in early nanotechnology evolution The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 6 2011 680 696
5. A. Arora, and A. Gambardella The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour Research Policy 23 1994 523 532
6. E. Avenel, A.V. Favier, S. Ma, V. Mangematin, and C. Rieu Diversification and hybridization in firm knowledge bases in nanotechnologies Research Policy 36 6 2007 864 871
7. D. Baglieri, M.C. Cinici, and V. Mangematin Rejuvenating clusters with sleeping anchors: the case of nanoclusters Technovation 32 2012 2
8. N. Battard Convergence and multidisciplinarity in nanotechnology: laboratories as technological hubs Technovation 32 2012 2
9. R. Bettis, and C. Prahalad The dominant logic: retrospective and extension Strategic Management Journal 16 1 1995 5 14
10. A. Bonaccorsi, and G. Thoma Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology Research Policy 36 6 2007 813 831 (Pubitemid 46898551)
11. B. Bozeman, P. Laredo, and V. Mangematin Understanding the emergence and deployment of 'nano' S&T: introduction Research Policy 36 6 2007 807 812 (Pubitemid 46898550)
12. A. Chin cheng A fuzzy multiple criteria comparison of technology valuation methods for the new materials development Technovation 32 2012 2
13. W. Chunhsien An empirical study of commercialization performance on nanoproducts Technovation 32 2012 2
14. P. Cohendet, and E. Pawlak Diversity of entrepreneurs and diversity of clusters in nanotechnologies International Journal of Technology Management 46 3/4 2009 386 403
15. R. Compano Converging applications for active ageing policy Foresight 8 2 2006 30 42
16. K.E. Drexler The Engine of Creation 1986 MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts
17. M. Fiedler, and I.M. Welpe Antecedents of cooperative commercialisation strategies of nanotechnology firms Research Policy 39 3 2010 400 410
18. M. Fiedler, and I.M. Welpe Commercialisation of technology innovations: an empirical study on the influence of clusters and innovation networks International Journal of Technology Management 55 1 2011 410 437
19. R.A. Freitas Jr The future of nanomedicine Futurist 44 1 2010 21 22
20. R. Fynman Theres plenty of room at the bottom Engineering and Science 23 1960 22 36
21. A. Gambardella, and A. McGahan Business-model innovation: general purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure Long Range Planning 43 2010 2
22. C.E.Khalid Genet, and Caroline Gauthier Which model of technology transfer for nanotechnology? A comparison with biotech and microelectronics Technovation 32 2012 2
23. C. Grimpe, and R. Patuelli Regional knowledge production in nanomaterials: a spatial filtering approach Annals of Regional Science 46 3 2011 519 541
24. S. Grodal AoM Meaning Mechanisms in Nanotechnology: The Expansion and Contraction of Field Labels 2010 Academy of Management Montreal
25. International Small Business Journal 26 1 2008 5 7
26. L. Huang, Y. Guo, Z. Peng, and A.L. Porter Characterising a technology development at the stage of early emerging applications: nanomaterial-enhanced biosensors Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 23 5 2011 527 544
27. C. Hyungsub, and C.C.M. Mody The long history of molecular electronics: microelectronics origins of nanotechnology Social Studies of Science (Sage) 39 1 2009 11 50
28. N. Islam, and M. Miyazaki An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains Technovation 30 4 2010 229 237
29. L. Jiang, J. Tan, and M. Thursby Incumbent firm invention in emerging fields: evidence from the semiconductor industry Strategic Management Journal 32 1 2011 55 75
30. E.C.-F., Jordi Juanola-Feliu, Pere Miribel-Català, Josep Samitier, and Jaume Valls-Pasola Market challenges facing academic research in commercializing nano-enabled implantable devices for in-vivo biomedical analysis Technovation 32 2012 2
31. Y. Kajikawa, Y. Takeda, I. Sakata, and K. Matsushima Multiscale analysis of interfirm networks in regional clusters Technovation 30 2010 168 180
32. M. Kautt, S. Walsh, and K. Bittner Global distribution of micronano technology and fabrication centers: a portfolio analysis approach Technology Forecasting and Social Change 74 2007 1697 1717 (Pubitemid 350111982)
33. J. Kuzma, and T. Tanji Unpackaging synthetic biology: identification of oversight policy problems and options Regulation and Governance 4 1 2010 92 112
34. Y.G. Lee, and Y.I. Song Selecting the key research areas in nano-technology field using technology cluster analysis: a case study based on national R&D programs in South Korea Technovation 27 1-2 2007 57 64
35. J.D. Linton, R. Klassen, and V. Jayaraman Sustainable supply chains: an introduction Journal of Operations Management 25 6 2007 1075 1082 (Pubitemid 47429821)
36. J.D. Linton, and S. Walsh Integrating innovation and learning curve theory: an enabler for moving nanotechnologies and other emerging process technologies into production R&D Management 34 2004 513 522
37. J.D. Linton, and S.T. Walsh A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 5 2008 583 594 (Pubitemid 351737228)
38. D. Loveridge, P. Dewick, and S. Randles Converging technologies at the nanoscale: the making of a new world? Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20 1 2008 29 43
39. E.L.Sarah Maine, and Elizabeth Garnsey Process-based vs. product-based Innovation: value creation by nanotech ventures Technovation 32 2012 2
40. N. Malanowski, and R. Compano Combining ICT and cognitive science: opportunities and risks Foresight 9 3 2007 18 29
41. Mangematin, V., Errabi, K. The determinants of the science-based cluster growth: the case of nanotechnologies. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, forthcoming.
42. V. Mangematin, K. Errabi, and C. Gauthier Large players in the nanogame: dedicated nanotech subsidiairies or distributed nanotech capabilities? The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 6 2011 640 664
43. M. Meyer, D. Libaers, and J.-H. Park The emergence of novel science-related fields: regional or technological patterns? Exploration and exploitation in United Kingdom nanotechnology Regional Studies 45 7 2011 935 959
44. F. Munari, and L. Toschi Do venture capitalists have a bias against investment in academic spin-offs? Evidence from the micro- and nanotechnology sector in the UK Industrial and Corporate Change 20 2 2011 397 432
45. K.A. Munir The social construction of events: a study of institutional change in the photographic field Organization Studies 26 1 2005 93 112 (Pubitemid 41449269)
46. S.L. Newbert, B.A. Kirchhoff, and S.T. Walsh Defining the relationship among founding resources, strategies, and performance in technology-intensive new ventures: evidence from the semiconductor silicon industry Journal of Small Business Management 45 4 2007 438 466
47. Nikulainen, T., Palmberg, C. Transferring science-based technologies to industry - does nanotechnology make a difference? Technovation 30 (1), 311.
48. K.A. Packalen Complementing capital: the role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams abilities to obtain resources Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 31 6 2007 873 891
49. C. Palmberg The transfer and commercialisation of nanotechnology: a comparative analysis of university and company researchers Journal of Technology Transfer 33 6 2008 631 652
50. Raesfeld, Ariane von, Peter Geurts, Mark Jansen, Johannes Boshuizen, Regina Luttge, 2012. Influence of partner diversity on collaborative public R&D project outcomes: a study of application and commercialization of nanotechnologies in the Netherlands. Technovation 32, 2.
51. D.K.R. Robinson, A. Rip, and V. Mangematin Technological agglomeration and the emergence of clusters and networks in nanotechnology Research Policy 36 6 2007 871 879 (Pubitemid 46898553)
52. F.T. Rothaermel, and M. Thursby The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: sources of productivity in incumbent firm research Research Policy 36 6 2007 832 849 (Pubitemid 46908739)
53. Sabatier, V., Kennard, A., Mangematin, V., Challenging a dominant industry logic: technological discontinuities and disruptive business models in the drug industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Forthcoming.
54. C. Selin Expectations and the emergence of nanotechnology Science, Technology and Human Values 32 2 2007 196 220
55. P. Shapira, and J. Youtie The Journal of Technology Transfer Introduction to the symposium issue: nanotechnology innovation and policy - current strategies and future trajectories 36 6 2011 581 586
56. D. Teece Nanotechnology and the US national innovation system: continuity and change The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 6 2011 697 711
57. H. Throne-Holst, and E. Sto Who should be precautionary? Governance of nanotechnology in the risk society Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 20 1 2008 99 112
58. J. Thursby, and M. Thursby Universityindustry linkages in nanotechnology and biotechnology: evidence on collaborative patterns for new methods of inventing The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 6 2011 605 623
59. S. Walsh Road mapping a disruptive technology: a case study - the emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems Industry Technological Forecasting and Social Change 71 2004 161 185 (Pubitemid 38047690)
60. J. Wonglimpiyara The nano-revolution of Schumpeters Kondratieff cycle Technovation 25 2005 1349 1354
61. R. Yawson, and J. Kuzma Systems mapping of consumer acceptance of agrifood nanotechnology Journal of Consumer Policy 33 4 2010 299 322
62. G. Ying, H. Lu, and A.L. Porter The research profiling method applied to nano-enhanced, thin-film solar cells R&D Management 40 2 2010 195 208
63. J. Youtie, M. Iacopetta, and S. Graham Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer 33 3 2008 315 329
64. J. Youtie, and P. Shapira Mapping the nanotechnology enterprise: a multi-indicator analysis of emerging nanodistricts in the US South Journal of Technology Transfer 33 2 2008 209 223