Patient specific computational modeling in cardiovascular mechanics

Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 61-79

  Creane, Arthur ^a   Kelly, Daniel J ^b   Lally, Caitríona ^a,b  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Doyle; Fam_i; Ischemia; Shrinkage

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894679356     PISSN: 22129391     EISSN: 22129413     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4552-0_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Alastrué V, Garía A, Peña E, Rodríguez JF, Martínez MA, Doblaré M (2010) Numerical framework for patient-specific computational modeling of vascular tissue. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26(1):35–51
2. Chen X, Schmitt F (1992) Intrinsic surface properties from surface triangulation. In: ECCV’92 proceedings of the second European conference on computer vision. Springer, Berlin, pp 739– 743
3. Creane A, Maher E, Sultan S, Hynes N, Kelly DJ, Lally C (2010) Finite element modeling of diseased carotid bifurcations generated from in vivo computerised tomographic angiography. Comput Biol Med 40(4):419–429
4. Creane A, Maher E, Sultan S, Hynes N, Kelly DJ, Lally C (2011) Prediction of fiber architecture and adaptation in diseased carotid bifurcations. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10(6):831–843
5. Delfino A, Stergiopulos N, Moore J, Meister JJ (1997) Residual strain effects on the stress field in a thick wall finite element model of the human carotid bifurcation. J Biomech 30(8):777–786
6. Doyle BJ, Callanan A, Burke PE, Grace PA, Walsh MT, Vorp DA, McGloughlin TM (2009) Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 49(2):443–454
7. Driessen NJB, Wilson W, Bouten CVC, Baaijens FPT (2004) A computational model for collagen fiber remodeling in the arterial wall. J Theor Biol 226(1):53–64
8. Fillinger MF, Marra SP, Raghavan ML, Kennedy FE (2003) Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. J Vasc Surg 37(4):724–732
9. Fillinger MF, Raghavan ML, Marra SP, Cronenwett JL, Kennedy FE (2002) In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. J Vasc Surg 36(3):589–597
10. Finlay HM, Whittaker P, Canham PB (1998) Collagen organization in the branching region of human brain arteries. Stroke 29(8):1595
11. Flamini V, Kerskens C, Moerman KM, Simms CK, Lally C (2010) Imaging arterial fibers using diffusion tensor imaging—feasibility study and preliminary results. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process 2010:1–14
12. Gao H, Long Q, Kumar Das S, Halls J, Graves M, Gillard JH, Li Z-Y (2011) Study of carotid arterial plaque stress for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. J Biomech 44(14):2551–2557
13. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modeling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fiber orientations. J R Soc Interface 3(6):15–35
14. Gee MW, Förster C, Wall WA (2010) A computational strategy for prestressing patient-specific biomechanical problems under finite deformation. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26(1):52– 72
15. Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV, Kamarianakis Y, Papaharilaou Y, Kostas T, Manousaki E, Katsamouris AN (2010) The role of geometric parameters in the prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39(1):42–48
16. Giannoglou G, Giannakoulas G, Soulis J, Chatzizisis Y, Perdikides T, Melas N, Parcharidis G, Louridas G (2006) Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion. Angiology 57(4):487–494
17. Golledge J, Greenhalgh RM, Davies AH (2000) The symptomatic carotid plaque. Stroke 31(3):774–781
18. Hameiri E, Shimshoni I (2003) Estimating the principal curvatures and the Darboux frame from real 3-d range data. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern, Part B, Cybern 33(4):626–637
19. Hariton I, deBotton G, Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2007) Stress-modulated collagen fiber remodeling in a human carotid bifurcation. J Theor Biol 248(3):460–470
20. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61(1):1–48
21. Huang X, Yang C, Yuan C, Liu F, Canton G, Zheng J, Woodard PK, Sicard GA, Tang D (2009) Patient-specific artery shrinkage and 3D zero-stress state in multi-component 3D FSI models for carotid atherosclerotic plaques based on in vivo MRI data. Mol Cell Biomech 6(2):121
22. Kiousis DE, Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2007) A numerical model to study the interaction of vascular stents with human atherosclerotic lesions. Ann Biomed Eng 35(11):1857–1869
23. Leach JR, Rayz VL, Soares B, Wintermark M, Mofrad MRK, Saloner D (2010) Carotid atheroma rupture observed in vivo and FSI-predicted stress distribution based on pre-rupture imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 38(8):2748–2765
24. Li Z-Y, Howarth SPS, Tang T, Graves MJ, U-King-Im J, Trivedi RA, Kirkpatrick PJ, Gillard JH (2007) Structural analysis and magnetic resonance imaging predict plaque vulnerability: a study comparing symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. J Vasc Surg 45(4):768–775
25. Li ZY, Tang T, U-King-Im J, Graves M, Sutcliffe M, Gillard JH (2008) Assessment of carotid plaque vulnerability using structural and geometrical determinants. Circ J 72(7):1092–1099
26. Lu J, Zhou X, Raghavan ML (2007) Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Biomech 40(3):693–696
27. Ma B, Harbaugh RE, Raghavan ML (2004) Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 32(2):264–273
28. Maier A, Gee MW, Reeps C, Pongratz J, Eckstein HH, Wall WA (2010) A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction. Ann Biomed Eng 38(10):3124–3134
29. Martufi G, Di Martino ES, Amon CH, Muluk SC, Finol EA (2009) Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution. J Biomech Eng 131(6):061015
30. Mortier P, Holzapfel GA, Beule M, Loo D, Taeymans Y, Segers P, Verdonck P, Verhegghe B (2009) A novel simulation strategy for stent insertion and deployment in curved coronary bifurcations: comparison of three drug-eluting stents. Ann Biomed Eng 38(1):88–99
31. Naghavi M (2003) From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: part I. Circulation 108(14):1664–1672
32. Ohayon J, Dubreuil O, Tracqui P, Le Floc’h S, Rioufol G, Chalabreysse L, Thivolet F, Pettigrew RI, Finet G (2007) Influence of residual stress/strain on the biomechanical stability of vulnerable coronary plaques: potential impact for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. Am J Physiol, Heart Circ Physiol 293(3):H1987–H1996
33. Pierce DM, Trobin W, Raya JG, Trattnig S, Bischof H, Glaser C, Holzapfel GA (2010) DT-MRI based computation of collagen fiber deformation in human articular cartilage: a feasibility study. Ann Biomed Eng 38(7):2447–2463
34. Raghavan M, Ma B, Fillinger MF (2006) Non-invasive determination of zero-pressure geometry of arterial aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 34(9):1414–1419
35. Rhodin JAG (1980) Architecture of the vessel wall. In: Bohr DF, Somlyo AD, Sparks HV (eds) The cardiovascular system. Handbook of physiology, vol 2. Am Physiol Soc, Bethesda, pp 1–31
36. Rissland P, Alemu Y, Einav S, Ricotta J, Bluestein D (2009) Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. J Biomech Eng 131(3):031001
37. Rodríguez JF, Martufi G, Doblaré M, Finol EA (2009) The effect of material model formulation in the stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 37(11):2218–2221
38. Rodríguez JF, Ruiz C, Doblaré M, Holzapfel GA (2008) Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy. J Biomech Eng 130(2):021023
39. Rowe AJ, Finlay HM, Canham PB (2003) Collagen biomechanics in cerebral arteries and bifurcations assessed by polarizing microscopy. J Vasc Res 40(4):406–415
40. Sacks MS, Vorp DA, Raghavan M, Federle MP, Webster MW (1999) In vivo three-dimensional surface geometry of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 27(4):469–479
41. Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, Graves MJ, Gaunt ME, Gillard JH (2011) High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging-based biomechanical stress analysis of carotid atheroma: a comparison of single transient ischaemic attack, recurrent transient ischaemic attacks, non-disabling stroke and asymptomatic patient groups. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41(1):83–90
42. Sadat U, Teng Z, Young VE, Walsh SR, Li ZY, Graves MJ, Varty K, Gillard JH (2010) Association between biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic carotid plaques and subsequent ischaemic cerebrovascular events—a longitudinal in vivo magnetic resonance imaging-based finite element study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40(4):485–491
43. Schaar JA, Muller JE, Falk E, Virmani R, Fuster V, Serruys PW, Colombo A, Stefanadis C, Ward Casscells S, Moreno PR (2004) Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Eur Heart J 25(12):1077
44. Shum J, DiMartino ES, Goldhammer A, Goldman DH, Acker LC, Patel G, Ng JH, Martufi G, Finol EA (2010a) Semiautomatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in computed tomography images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Med Phys 37(2):638
45. Shum J, Xu A, Chatnuntawech I, Finol EA (2010b) A framework for the automatic generation of surface topologies for abdominal aortic aneurysm models. Ann Biomed Eng 39(1):249–259
46. Tang D, Teng Z, Canton G, Hatsukami TS, Dong L, Huang X, Yuan C (2009) Local critical stress correlates better than global maximum stress with plaque morphological features linked to atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability: an in vivo multi-patient study. Biomed Eng 8(1):15
47. Teng Z, Sadat U, Ji G, Zhu C, Young VE, Graves MJ, Gillard JH (2011) Lumen irregularity dominates the relationship between mechanical stress condition, fibrous-cap thickness, and lumen curvature in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. J Biomech Eng 133(3):034501
48. Teng Z, Sadat U, Li Z, Huang X, Zhu C, Young VE, Graves MJ, Gillard JH (2010) Arterial luminal curvature and fibrous-cap thickness affect critical stress conditions within atherosclerotic plaque: an in vivo MRI-based 2D finite-element study. Ann Biomed Eng 38(10):3096–3101
49. Vande Geest JP, Schmidt DE, Sacks MS, Vorp DA (2008) The effects of anisotropy on the stress analyses of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 36(6):921–932
50. Vande Geest JP, Wang DHJ, Wisniewski SR, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA (2006) Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 34(7):1098–1106
51. Vorp DA (2007) Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Biomech 40(9):1887–1902
52. Vorp DA, Raghavan M, Webster MW (1998) Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry. J Vasc Surg 27(4):632–639
53. Wu EX, Wu Y, Nicholls JM, Wang J, Liao S, Zhu S, Lau C-P, Tse H-F (2007) MR diffusion tensor imaging study of postinfarct myocardium structural remodeling in a porcine model. Magn Reson Med 58(4):687–695
54. Yang C, Bach RG, Zheng J, Ei Naqa I, Woodard PK, Teng Z, Billiar K, Tang D (2009) In vivo IVUS-based 3-D fluid–structure interaction models with cyclic bending and anisotropic vessel properties for human atherosclerotic coronary plaque mechanical analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56(10):2420–2428
55. Zhang S, Crow JA, Yang X, Chen J, Borazjani A, Mullins KB, Chen W, Cooper RC, McLaughlin RM, Liao J (2010) The correlation of 3D DT-MRI fiber disruption with structural and mechanical degeneration in porcine myocardium. Ann Biomed Eng 38(10):3084–3095