A computational strategy for prestressing patient-specific biomechanical problems under finite deformation

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 52-72

  Gee, M W ^a   Forster Ch ^a   Wall, W A ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Biomechanics; Inverse design analysis; Patient specific modeling; Prestraining; Prestressing

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM; ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS; INVERSE DESIGNS; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; PRESTRAINING;

BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; MEDICAL IMAGING; PRESTRESSING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 77952960221     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1236     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Humphrey J, Taylor C. Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms: similarities, differences, and need for a new class of computational models. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2008; 10:221-246.
2. Vorp D. Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanics 2007; 40:1887-1902.
3. Lasheras J. The biomechanics of arterial aneurysms. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 2007; 39:293-319.
4. Raghavan M, Vorp D. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. Journal of Biomechanics 2000; 33:475-482.
5. Fillinger M, Marra S, Raghavan M, Kennedy F. Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2003; 37:724-732.
6. Fillinger M, Raghavan M, Marra S, Croonenwett J, Kennedy F. In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2002; 36:589-597
7. Raghavan M, Fillinger M, Marra S, Naegelein B, Kennedy F. Automated methodology for determination of stress distribution in human abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 2005; 127:868-871.
8. Govindjee S, Mihalic P. Computational methods for inverse finite elastostatics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 136:47-57.
9. Govindjee S, Mihalic P. Computational methods for inverse deformations in quasi-incompressible finite elasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 43:821-838.
10. Tezduyar T, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin B. Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space-time fluid-structure interaction technique. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2008; 57:601-629.
11. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar T. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling. Computational Mechanics 2008; 43:151-159.
12. Chadwick P. Application of an energy-momentum tensor in elastostatics. Journal of Elasticity 1975; 5:249-258.
13. Shield R. Inverse deformation results in finite elasticity. Zeitschrift f̈ur Angewandte Mathematik und Physik 1967; 18:381-389.
14. Lu J, Zhou X, Raghavan M. Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanics 2007; 40:693-696.
15. Lu J, Zhou X, Raghavan M. Inverse method of stress analysis for cerebral aneurysms. Biomechanics and Modelling in Mechanobiology 2008; 7:477-486.
16. Fachinotti V, Cardona A, Jetteur P. Finite element modelling of inverse design problems in large deformation anisotropic hyperelasticity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2008; 74:894-910.
17. Holzapfel G. Nonlinear Solid Mechanics. Wiley: New York, 2000.
18. Tezduyar T, Schwaab M, Sathe S. Sequentially-coupled arterial fluid-structure interaction (scafsi) technique. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2008. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-6-38.