A framework for the automatic generation of surface topologies for abdominal aortic aneurysm models

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 249-259

  Shum, Judy ^a   Xu, Amber ^a   Chatnuntawech, Itthi ^a   Finol, Ender A ^a,b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneurysm; Curvature; Optimal polygon quality; Rupture; Smoothing; Surface topology

Indexed keywords

ANEURYSM; CURVATURE; OPTIMAL POLYGON QUALITY; RUPTURE; SMOOTHING; SURFACE TOPOLOGY;

ALGORITHMS; BLOOD VESSELS; CURVE FITTING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; INTERPOLATION; LOW PASS FILTERS; OPTIMIZATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TRIANGULATION; WALLS (STRUCTURAL PARTITIONS);

TOPOLOGY;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ALGORITHM; AORTA RUPTURE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALGORITHMS; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 78650875966     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-010-0165-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. GA Ateshian MP Rosenwasser VC Mow 1992 Curvature characteristics and congruence of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: differences between female and male joints J. Biomech. 6 591 607 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90102-7
2. ES Di Martino A Bohra JP Vande Geest N Gupta M Makaroun DA Vorp 2006 Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue J. Vasc. Surg. 43 570 576 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.072 16520175 (Pubitemid 43332745)
3. P Dobrin W Baker W Gley 1984 Elastolytic and collagenolytic studies of arteries Arch. Surg. 119 405 409 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7ltlaqtg%3D%3D 6322726
4. MF Fillinger J Racusin RK Baker JL Cronenwett A Teutelink ML Schermerhorn, et al. 2004 Anatomic characteristics of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm on conventional CT scans: implications for rupture risk J. Vasc. Surg. 39 1243 1252 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.025 15192565 (Pubitemid 38952593)
5. MF Fillinger ML Raghavan SP Marra JL Cronenwett FE Kennedy 2002 In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk J. Vasc. Surg. 36 589 597 10.1067/mva.2002.125478 12218986
6. G Giannakoulas G Giannoglou JV Soulis G Louridas G Parharidis 2007 Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. What matters most: geometry or blood pressure? Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 34 122 123 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2szksVWntA%3D%3D 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.01.021 17407827 (Pubitemid 46852382)
7. G Giannoglou G Giannakoulas J Soulis Y Chatzizisis T Perdikides N Melas, et al. 2006 Predicting the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms by utilizing various geometrical parameters: revisiting the diameter criterion Angiology 57 487 494 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rpt1Wiug%3D%3D 10.1177/0003319706290741 17022385 (Pubitemid 44449048)
8. B Ma RE Harbaugh ML Raghavan 2004 Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of cerebral aneurysms Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32 264 273 10.1023/B:ABME.0000012746.31343.92 15008374
9. G Martufi ES Di Martino CH Amon SC Muluk EA Finol 2009 Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution J. Biomech. Eng. 131 061015 10.1115/1.3127256 19449969
10. W Mower L Baraff J Sneyd 1993 Stress distribution in vascular aneurysms: factors affecting risk of aneurysm rupture J. Surg. Res. 55 155 161 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FhslKrtg%3D%3D 10.1006/jsre.1993.1123 8412094 (Pubitemid 23335791)
11. Nyilas, R. D., S. M. L Ng, J. Leung, and X. Y. Xu. Towards a new geometric approach to assess the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms using patient specific modeling. In: 2005 Summer Bioengineering Conference, June 22-26, Vail Cascade Resort & Spa, Vail, CL.
12. S Pappu A Dardik H Tagare RJ Gusberg 2008 Beyond fusiform and saccular: a novel quantitative tortuosity index may help classify aneurysm shape and predict aneurysm rupture potential Ann. Vasc. Surg. 22 88 97 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.004 18023556
13. PO Persson G Strang 2004 A simple mesh generator in MATLAB SIAM Rev. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 46 329 345
14. ML Raghavan J Kratzberg EM Castro de Tolosa MM Hanaoka P Walker ES da Silva 2006 Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm J. Biomech. 39 3010 3016 10.1016/j.jbiomech. 2005.10.021 16337949 (Pubitemid 44792106)
15. ML Raghavan B Ma RE Harbaugh 2005 Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk J. Neurosurg. 102 355 362 10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0355 15739566
16. MS Sacks CJ Chuong GH Templeton R Peshock 1993 In vivo 3-D reconstruction and geometric characterization of the right ventricular free wall Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21 263 275 1:STN:280:DyaK3szhvFWktQ%3D%3D 10.1007/BF02368182 8328726
17. MS Sacks DA Vorp ML Raghavan MP Federle MW Webster 1999 In vivo three-dimensional surface geometry of abdominal aortic aneurysms Ann. Biomed. Eng. 27 469 479 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzps1ejtQ%3D%3D 10.1114/1.202 10468231
18. J Shum ES DiMartino A Goldhammer D Goldman L Acker G Patel, et al. 2010 Semi-automatic vessel wall detection and quantification of wall thickness in CT images of human abdominal aortic aneurysms Med. Phys. 37 638 648 10.1118/1.3284976 20229873
19. DB Smith MS Sacks PM Pattany R Schroeder 1999 Fatigue-induced changes in bioprosthetic heart valve three-dimensional geometry and the relation to tissue damage J. Heart Valve Dis 8 1 25 33 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7psVWnsA%3D%3D 10096478
20. DB Smith MS Sacks DA Vorp M Thornton 2000 Surface geometric analysis of anatomic structures using biquintic finite element interpolation Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28 598 611 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fos1entg%3D%3D 10.1114/1.1306342 10983706
21. Taubin, G. Signal processing approach to fair surface design. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, August 9-11. New York: ACM, 1995.
22. GR Upchurch Jr TA Schaub 2006 Abdominal aortic aneurysm Am. Fam. Physician 73 1198 11204 16623206
23. H Van Damme N Sakalihasan R Limet 2005 Factors promoting rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms Acta Chir. Belg. 105 1 11 15790196
24. JP Van de Geest DH Wang SR Wisniewski MS Makaroun DA Vorp 2006 Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34 1908 1916 10.1007/s10439-006-9206-5 (Pubitemid 44770843)
25. AK Venkatasubramaniam MJ Fagan T Mehta KJ Mylankal B Ray G Kuhan, et al. 2004 A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 28 168 176 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czjt1GktQ%3D%3D 15234698
26. DA Vorp 2007 Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm J. Biomech. 40 1887 1902 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.003 17254589 (Pubitemid 46850732)
27. DA Vorp ML Raghavan MW Webster 1998 Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry J. Vasc. Surg. 27 632 639 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jsFKjtQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0741-5214(98)70227-7 9576075 (Pubitemid 28201752)