Evaluation of Existing Fragility Curves

Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue , 2014, Pages 47-93

  Rossetto, Tiziana ^a   D'Ayala, Dina ^a   Ioannou, Ioanna ^a   Meslem, Abdelghani ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894620306     PISSN: 15736059     EISSN: 18724671     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6_3     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. ALA (2001) Seismic fragility formulations for water systems: Part 1-Guidelines. American Lifelines Alliance, ASCE-FEMA.
2. Amiri GG, Jalalian M, Amrei SAR (2007) Derivation of vulnerability functions based on observational data for Iran. In: Proceedings of international symposium on innovation and sustainability of structures in civil engineering, Tongji University, China.
3. Anagnos T (1999) Development of an electrical substation equipment performance database for evaluation of equipment fragilities. PG&E/PEER report, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA.
4. Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. J Earthq Eng 8(5): 643-661.
5. Applied Technology Council (1985) ATC-13, Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City, CA, 492 pp.
6. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2007) Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters. ATC-63 90% Draft, Redwood City, CA.
7. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, vol 1-Methodology. ATC-58, Redwood City, CA.
8. Argyroudis S, Pitilakis K (2012) Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 35: 1-12.
9. Aslani H, Miranda E (2004) Component-level and system-level sensitivity study for earthquake loss estimation. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
10. Aspinall W, Cooke RM (1998) Expert judgement and the Montserrat volcano eruption. In: Mosleh A, Bari RA (eds) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management PSAM4, New York, USA, 13-18 Sept 1998.
11. Baker J (2011) Fitting fragility functions to structural analysis data using maximum likelihood estimation, Working paper-PEER.
12. Baker JW, Cornell CA (2003) Uncertainty specification and propagation for loss estimation using FOSM methods. In: Proceeding of the ninth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), 6-9 July 2003, San Francisco. Civil Engineering Risk and Reliability Association (CERRA), San Francisco.
13. Baker JW, Cornell CA (2008) Uncertainty propagation in probabilistic seismic loss estimation. Struct Saf 30(3): 236-252.
14. Bakhshi A, Karimi K (2006) Method of developing fragility curves a case study for seismic assessment of masonry buildings in Iran. In: 7th international Congress in civil engineering, Tehran, Iran.
15. Basoz NI, Kiremidjian AS, King SA, Law KH (1999) Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 15(1): 25-54.
16. Bensi M, Der Kiureghian A, Straub D (2011) A Bayesian network methodology for infrastructure seismic risk assessment and decision support, PEER report 2011/2, March 2011.
17. Bhuiyan AR, Alamb MS (2012) Seismic vulnerability assessment of a multi-span continuous highway bridge fitted with shape memory alloy bars and laminated rubber bearings. Earthq Spectra 28(4): 1379-1404.
18. Bojórquez E, Iervolino I, Reyes-Salazar A, Ruiz SE (2009) Comparing vector-valued intensity measures for fragility analysis of steel frames in the case of narrow-band ground motions. Eng Struct 45: 472-480.
19. Borzi B, Crowley H, Pinho R (2008) Simplified pushover-based earthquake loss assessment (SP-BELA) method for masonry buildings. Int J Archit Herit 2(4): 353-376.
20. Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: a statistical study of damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M. S. K.-76 scale, Report, Rome, Italy.
21. Brzev S, ScawthornC, Charleson A, JaiswalK(2012)GEMbasic building taxonomy, version 1. 0, GEM ontology and taxonomy global component project. Available from http://www. nexus. globalquakemodel. org/gem-ontology-taxonomy/posts/updated-gem-basic-building-taxonomy-v1. 0.
22. Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal 19(2): 187-203.
23. Coburn AW, Spence RJS (2002) Earthquake protection. Wiley, Chichester.
24. Colombi M, Borzi B, Crowley H, Onida M, Meroni F, Pinho R (2008) Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3): 485-504.
25. Cooke M (1991) Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. Cooke RM (2001) EXCALIBUR-Windows version of EXCALIBUR: software for performance based combination of expert judgements. Department of Mathematics, Delft University of Technology. Website: http://delta. am. eqi. tudelft. nl/risk/.
27. Corigliano M, Scandella L, Lai CG, Paolucci R (2011) Seismic analysis of deep tunnels in near fault conditions: a case study in southern Italy. Bull Earthq Eng 9(4): 975-995.
28. Cornell CA, Krawinkler H (2000) Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 3(2): Spring.
29. D'Ayala D (2005) Force and displacement based vulnerability assessment for traditional buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 3(3): 235-265.
30. D'Ayala D (2013) Assessing the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. In: Tesfamariam S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 334-365.
31. D'Ayala D, Meslem A (2013) Guide for Selection of existing analytical fragility curves and compilation of the database. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
32. D'Ayala D, Jaiswal K, Wald DJ, Porter K, Greene M (2010) Collaborative effort to estimate collapse fragility for buildings worldwide: the WHE-PAGER project. In: Proceedings of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering structure: Reaching beyond borders.
33. Dalkey N (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. A report prepared for United States Air Force Project Rand RM-5888-PR, 79 pp.
34. Demircioglu MB, Erdik M, Hancilar U, Sesetyan K, Tuzun C, Yenidogan C, Zulfikar AC (2010) Technical manual-earthquake loss estimation routine ELER-v3. 0, Department of Earthquake Engineering Structure, Bogazici University, Istanbul, 133 pp.
35. Ellingwood B (2009) Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Struct Saf 31(2): 179-187.
36. Elnashai AS, Borzi B, Vlachos S (2004) Deformation-based vulnerability functions for RC bridges. Struct Eng 17(2): 215-244.
37. European Committee of Standardization (CEN) (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings, ENV 1998-3, Brussels, Belgium.
38. Fajfar P (2000) A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 16(3): 573-591.
39. FEMA (2003) HAZUS-MH technical manual. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
40. FEMA 356 (2000) Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report no 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston Virginia, USA.
41. Giovinazzi S, King A (2009) Estimating seismic impacts on lifelines: an international review for RiskScape. In: Proceedings of the 2009 NZSEE conference, Christchurch, New Zealand.
42. Grünthal G (ed) (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Cahiers du Centre Europèen de Gèodynamique et de Seismologie, vol 15. Conseil de l'Europe.
43. Gu{double acute}lkan P, Sucuoǧlu H, Ergu{double acute}nay O (1992) Earthquake vulnerability, loss and risk assessment in Turkey. In: Proceedings of 11th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Madrid, Spain.
44. Hancilar U, Taucer F, Corbane C (2011) Empirical fragility assessment after the January 12, 2010 Haiti earthquake, risk analysis VIII, B. C. A. WIT Press, Southampton.
45. Hwang H, Liu JB, Chiu Y-H (2001) Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges, MAEC report: project MAEC RR-4. Mid-America Earthquake Center, Urbana-Champaign.
46. Ioannou I, Rossetto T (2013) Sensitivity of empirical fragility assessment of buildings to the misclassification error of damage. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on structural safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR 2013), Columbia University, New York, USA, 16-20 June 2013.
47. Ioannou I, Rossetto T, Damian GN (2012) Use of regression analysis for the construction of empirical fragility curves. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Lisbon, Portugal, 24-28 September.
48. Jaiswal K, Wald DJ (2010) Development of a semi-empirical loss model within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquake for Response (PAGER) system. In: Proceedings of the 9th U. S. and 10th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering: Reaching beyond borders, 25-29 July 2010, Toronto, ON, Canada, Paper No. 1095.
49. Jaiswal K, Wald D, D'Ayala D (2011) Developing empirical collapse fragility functions for global building types. Earthq Spectra 27(3): 775-795.
50. Jaiswal KS, Aspinall WP, Perkins D, Wald D, Porter KA (2012) Use of expert judgement elicitation to estimate seismic vulnerability of selected building types. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Lisbon, Portugal, 24-28 Sept 2012.
51. Jiang H, Lu H, Chen L (2012) Seismic fragility assessment of RC moment-resisting frames designed according to the current Chinese seismic design code. J Asian Archit Build 11(1): 153-160.
52. Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G (2010) Fragility curves for R/C buildings in Greece. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1): 39-53.
53. Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Penelis G (2006) A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4(4): 391-413.
54. Karababa FS, Pomonis A (2010) Damage data analysis and vulnerability estimation following the August 14, 2003 Lefkada Island, Greece, earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 9: 1015-1046.
55. Kaynia AM (ed) (2013) Guidelines for deriving seismic fragility functions of elements at risk: Buildings, lifelines, transportation networks and critical facilities. SYNER-G reference report 4. JRC scientific and policy report. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, pp 250. doi: 10. 2788/19605.
56. Klügel J-U (2005) On the use of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis as an input for seismic PSA. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMiRT18), Beijing, China, 7-12 Aug 2005. PaperKM02_2.
57. Klügel J-U (2011) Uncertainty analysis and expert judgement in seismic hazard analysis. Pure Appl Geophys 168(1-2): 27-53.
58. Lagomarsino S, Cattari S (2013) Seismic vulnerability of existing buildings. In: Gueguen P (ed) Seismic vulnerability of structures. Wiley, Hoboken. doi: 10. 1002/9781118603925. ch1.
59. Liel A, Linch K (2012) Vulnerability of reinforced-concrete-frame buildings and their occupants in the 2009 L'Aquila, Italy, earthquake. Nat Hazard Rev 13(1): 11-23.
60. Maruyama Y, Yamazaki F, Mizuno K, Tsuchiya Y, Yogai H (2010) Fragility curves for expressway embankments based on damage datasets after recent earthquakes in Japan. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30: 1158-1167.
61. Moehle J, Deierlein G (2004) A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering structure. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, BC, Paper No. 679.
62. Molina S, Lang DH, Lindholm CD (2009) User and technical manual, SELENA v4. 0, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway, 85 pp.
63. Morris PA (1977) Combining expert judgements: a Bayesian approach. Manage Sci 23 (7): 679-693.
64. Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007) Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthq Eng Struct 36(6): 823-839.
65. O'Rourke MJ, So P (2000) Seismic fragility curves for on-grade steel tanks. Earthq Spectra 16 (4): 801-815.
66. Orsini G (1999) A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI). Earthq Spectra 15(3): 463-483.
67. Ouchi F (2004) A literature review on the use of expert opinion in probabilistic risk analysis. World Bank policy research working paper 3201, February 2004.
68. Pagnini L, Vicente R, Lagomarsimo S, Varum H (2008) A mechanical method for the vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Beijing, China.
69. Park YJ, Ang AHS (1985) Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. J Struct Eng 111(4): 722-739.
70. Porter K (2011) GEM vulnerability rating system, GEM global vulnerability estimation methods consortium. Available from www. nexus. globalquakemodel. org/gem-vulnerability/posts/.
71. Rajeev P, Tesfamariam S (2011) Effect of construction quality variability on seismic fragility of reinforced concrete building. In: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering structure building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 14-16 April.
72. Rossetto T (2004) Vulnerability curves for the seismic assessment of reinforced concrete structure populations. Ph. D. thesis, Imperial College, London, UK.
73. Rossetto T, Elnashai AS (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25: 1241-1263.
74. Rossetto T, Elnashai AS (2005) A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacementbased vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Eng Struct 27: 397-409.
75. Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013a) Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships: compendium and guide for selection. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy, April 2013, pp 62.
76. Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013b) Guidelines for the construction of empirical fragility and vulnerability relationships. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
77. Rota M, Penna A, Strobbia CL (2008) Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(10): 933-947.
78. Sarabandi P, Pachakis D, King S, Kiremidjian A (2004) Empirical fragility functions from recent earthquakes In: Proceedings of 13th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Vancouver, Canada.
79. Scheibe M, Skutsch M, Schofer J (1975) Experiments in Delphi methodology. In: Linestone H, Turoff M (eds) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley, London.
80. Scherbaum F, Kuehn NM (2011) Logic tree branch weights and probabilities: summing up to one is not enough. Earthq Spectra 27(4): 1237-1251.
81. Shahzada K, Gencturk B, Khan AN, Naseer A, Javed M, FahadM(2011) Vulnerability assessment of typical buildings in Pakistan. Int J Earth Sci Eng 4: 208-211.
82. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech-ASCE 126(12): 1459-1467.
83. Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1997) A method for earthquake motion damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames. State University of New York at Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Structure Research Report NCEER-97-0008.
84. Solberg KM, Dhakal RP, Mander JB, Bradley BA (2008) Computational and rapid expected annual loss estimation methodologies for structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(1): 81-101.
85. Song J, Kang W (2009) System reliability and sensitivity under statistical dependence by matrixbased system reliability method. Struct Saf 31(2): 148-156.
86. Spence RJS, Coburn AW, Pomonis A (1992) Correlation of ground motion with building damage: The definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on earthquake engineering structure, Balkema, Rotterdam.
87. Stafford PJ (2013) Uncertainties in ground motion prediction in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) of civil infrastructure. In: Tasfamarian S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 29-56.
88. SYNER-G (2011) Fragility functions for common masonry building types in Europe. D3. 2, University of Pavia, 177 pp.
89. Uma SR, Ryu H, Luco N, Liel AB, Raghunandan M (2011) Comparison of main-shock and aftershock fragility curves developed for New Zealand and US buildings. In: Proceedings of the ninth pacific conference on earthquake engineering structure building and Earthquake-Resilient Society, Auckland, New Zealand, 14-16 April.
90. Vacareanu R, Chesca AB, Georgescu B, Seki M (2007) Case study on the expected seismic losses of soft and weak ground floor buildings. International symposium on strong vrancea earthquake and risk mitigation, Bucharest, Romania, October.
91. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell AC (2002) Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31(3): 491-514.
92. Wen YK, Ellinwood BR, Bracci J (2004) Vulnerability function framework for consequencebased engineering, Mid-America Earthquake Center, CD Release 04-04.
93. Yang TY (2013) Assessing seismic risks for new and existing buildings using performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) methodology. In: Tasfamarian S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, London, pp 307-333.