Comparing vector-valued intensity measures for fragility analysis of steel frames in the case of narrow-band ground motions

Engineering Structures

Volumn 45, Issue , 2012, Pages 472-480

  Bojórquez, Edén ^a   Iervolino, Iunio ^b   Reyes Salazar, Alfredo ^a   Ruiz, Sonia E ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SINALOA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Energy based damage index; Maximum inter story drift; Spectral shape

Indexed keywords

CUMULATIVE DAMAGE; DAMAGE INDEX; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; GROUND MOTION INTENSITY MEASURES; GROUND MOTIONS; INTEGRAL PARAMETERS; INTENSITY MEASURE; INTERSTORY DRIFTS; ME-XICO; MEXICO CITY; NARROW BANDS; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; SOFT SOILS; SPECTRAL ACCELERATION; SPECTRAL SHAPES; STEEL FRAME; STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE; TWO PARAMETER; VECTOR VALUED;

DAMAGE DETECTION; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; SEISMOLOGY; STEEL CONSTRUCTION; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

VECTORS;

ACCELERATION; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMICITY; STEEL STRUCTURE;

FEDERAL DISTRICT [MEXICO]; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; MEXICO CITY;

EID: 84864812976     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Cornell C.A., Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 2000, 3(2).
2. Deierlein GG. Overview of a comprehensive framework for performance earthquake assessment. Report PEER 2004/05. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center; 2004. p. 15-26.
3. Vamvatsikos D., Cornell C.A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2002, 31(3):491-514.
4. Housner GW. Spectrum intensities of strong motion earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the symposium on earthquake and blast effects on structures. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; 1952.
5. Arias A. A measure of earthquake intensity. Seismic design for nuclear power plants 1970, 438-483. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA). R.J. Hansen (Ed.).
6. Von-Thun J.L., Rochin L.H., Scott G.A., Wilson J.A. Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams. Earthquake engineering and soil dynamics: II. Recent advance in ground-motion evaluation. Geotechnical special publication 20 1988, 463-481. ASCE, New York.
7. Shome N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. PhD thesis, Stanford University; 1999.
8. Cordova PP, Dierlein GG, Mehanny SSF, Cornell CA. Development of a two parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure. The second U.S.-Japan workshop on performance-based earthquake engineering methodology for reinforce concrete building structures, Sapporo, Hokkaido; 2001. p. 187-206.
9. Baker J.W., Cornell C.A. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2005, 34:1193-1217.
10. Riddell R. On ground motion intensity indices. Earthq Spectra 2007, 23(1):147-173.
11. Yakut A., Yilmaz H. Correlation of deformation demands with ground motion intensity. J Struct Eng - ASCE 2008, 134(12):1818-1828.
12. Bojórquez E., Iervolino I. Spectral shape proxies and nonlinear structural response. Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 2001, 31(7):996-1008.
13. Iervolino I., Cornell C.A. Records selection for nonlinear seismic analysis of structures. Earthq. Spectra 2005, 21(3):685-713.
14. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. Vector-valued probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In: 7th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering, earthquake engineering research institute, Boston, MA; 2002.
15. Elefante L., Jalayer F., Iervolino I., Manfredi G. Disaggregation-based record selection and modification for seismic risk assessment of structures. Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 2010, 30(12):1513-1527.
16. Buratti N. Confronto tra le performance di diverse misure di intensità dello scuotimento sísmico. XIV Convegno Nazionale " L'Ingegneria Sismica in Italia" ANDIS Bari; 2011 [in Italian].
17. Trifunac M.D., Brady A.G. A study of the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1975, 65(3):581-626.
18. Cosenza E., Manfredi G. The improvement of the seismic-resistant design for existing and new structures using damage criteria. Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes 1997, 119-130. Balkema, Rotterdam. P. Fajfar, H. Krawinkler (Eds.).
19. Iervolino I., Giorgio M., Galasso C., Manfredi G. Conditional hazard maps for secondary intensity measures. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2010, 100(6):3312-3319.
20. Luco N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis, SMRF connection fractures, and near-source effects. PhD thesis. Stanford University; 2002.
21. Bojórquez E., Reyes-Salazar A., Terán-Gilmore A., Ruiz S.E. Energy-based damage index for steel structures. Steel Compos Struct 2010, 10(4):343-360.
22. Bojórquez E., Terán-Gilmore A., Ruiz S.E., Reyes-Salazar A. Evaluation of structural reliability of steel frames: inter-story drifts versus plastic hysteretic energy. Earthq Spectra 2011, 27(3):661-682.
23. Baker JW. Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis. PhD thesis, Stanford University; 2005.
24. Bojórquez E, Iervolino I, Manfredi G. Evaluating a new proxy for spectral shape to be used as an intensity measure. In: 2008 Seismic engineering international conference commemorating the 1908 Messina and Reggio Calabria, Earthquake (MERCEA'08); 2008.
25. Mexico City Seismic Design Provisions. Normas Técnicas Complementarias para el Diseño por Sismo. Departamento del Distrito Federal; 2004 (in Spanish).
26. Bojórquez E, Rivera JL. Effects of degrading models for ductility and dissipated hysteretic energy in uniform annual failure rate spectra. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China; 2008.
27. Meli R., Avila J.A. The Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985 analysis of building response. Earthq Spectra 1989, 5(1):1-18.
28. Alcántara L, Quass R, Pérez C, Ayala M, Macías M, Sandoval H, et al. Base Mexicana de Datos de Sismos Fuertes, CD-ROM edited by Sociedad Mexicana de Ingeniería Sísmica, vol. 2; 2000.
29. Akbas B. Energy-based earthquake resistant design of steel moment resisting frames. PhD thesis, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology; 1997.
30. Bojórquez E., Ruiz S.E., Terán-Gilmore A. Reliability-based evaluation of steel structures using energy concepts. Eng Struct 2008, 30(6):1745-1759.
31. Iervolino I., Manfredi G., Cosenza E. Ground motion duration effects on nonlinear seismic response. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2006, 35:21-38.
32. Hancock J., Bommer J.J. A state-of-knowledge review of the influence of strong-motion duration on structural damage. Earthq Spectra 2006, 22(3):827-845.
33. Terán-Gilmore A., Jirsa J.O. Energy demands for seismic design against low cycle fatigue. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2007, 36:383-404.
34. Rodríguez M.E., Padilla C. A damage index for the seismic analysis of reinforced concrete members. J Earthq Eng 2008, 13(3):364-383.
35. Bazzurro P., Cornell C.A. Ground-motion amplification in nonlinear soil sites with uncertain properties. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2004, 94(6):2090-2109.
36. Bazzurro P., Cornell C.A. Nonlinear soil-site effects in probabilistic seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2004, 94(6):2110-2123.
37. Iervolino I., Cornell C.A. Probability of occurrence of velocity pulses in near-source ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2008, 98(2):2262-2277.
38. Bojórquez E, Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Influence of ground motion duration on degrading SDOF systems. In: 1st European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva (Switzerland), 3-8 September 2006 [paper # 425].