Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 10-11, 2008, Pages 933-947

  Rota, M ^a   Penna, A ^b   Strobbia, C L ^b  

^a European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk ROSE School   (Italy)

^b EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR TRAINING AND RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING EUCENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bootstrap; Existing buildings; Fragility curves; Nonlinear inversion; Post earthquake surveys; Seismic vulnerability

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA PROCESSING; EARTHQUAKES; FOOD PROCESSING; MAPS; OCCUPATIONAL RISKS; RISKS; SAFETY FACTOR; SEISMOLOGY; SURVEYS;

BUILDING DAMAGED; BUILDING TYPOLOGIES; DAMAGE LEVELS; DAMAGE PROBABILITY MATRICES; DAMAGE STATES; DIFFERENT SCALES; EARTHQUAKE RISKS; ELSEVIER (CO); FRAGILITY CURVES; HIGH POTENTIAL; IN ORDER; INVENTORY DATA; LOSS PARAMETERS; NONLINEAR REGRESSION METHODS; RISK MAPS; SEISMIC RISKS; SOME APPLICATIONS; SURVEY DATA; TIME CONSUMING;

CURVES (ROAD);

BOOTSTRAPPING; BUILDING; DATA INVERSION; EARTHQUAKE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; NONLINEARITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; TYPOLOGY; VULNERABILITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 46149117786     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Rossetto T., and Elnashai A. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25 (2003) 1241-1263
2. ATC-13. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, Applied technology council, FEMA contract no. EMW-C-0912, Redwood City, CA, 1985.
3. Calvi G.M. A displacement based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. J. Earthquake Eng 3 3 (1999) 411-438
4. Crowley H., Pinho R., and Bommer J.J. A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation. Bull Earthquake Eng 2 (2004) 173-219
5. FEMA. HAZUS earthquakes loss estimation methodology (1999), US Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington
6. Whitman R.V., Anagnos T., Kircher C.A., Lagorio H.J., Lawson R.S., and Schneider P. Development of a national earthquake loss estimation methodology. Earthquake Spectra 13 4 (1997) 643-661
7. Milutinovic ZV, Trendafiloski GS. RISK-UE: An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. WP4: Vulnerability of current buildings, 2003.
8. Ordaz M, Miranda E, Reinoso E, Pérez-Rocha LE. Seismic loss estimation model for Mexico City. In: Proceedings of the 12th WCEE, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
9. Giovinazzi S, Lagomarsino S. A macroseismic model for the vulnerability assessment of buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2004.
10. Bernardini A. Classi macrosismiche di vulnerabilità degli edifici in area veneto-friulana. In: Atti del XI Congresso Nazionale "L'ingegneria Sismica in Italia". Genova, Italy, 2004 [in Italian].
11. Kappos A.J., Panagopoulos G., Panagiotopoulos C., and Penelis G. A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthquake Eng 4 4 (2006) 391-413
12. Orsini G. A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of intensity (PSI). Earthquake Spectra 15 3 (1999) 463-483
13. Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D. A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the MSK76 scale. In: Proceedings of the seventh European conference on earthquake engineering, Athens, 1982.
14. Spence RJS, Coburn AW, Pomonis A, Sakai S. Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol. 1, Madrid, Spain, 1992. p. 551-6.
15. Sarabandi P, Pachakis D, King S, Kiremidjian A. Empirical fragility functions from recent earthquakes. Proceedings of the 13th WCEE, Vancouver, Canada, 2004.
16. Faccioli E., Pessina V., Calvi G.M., and Borzi B. A study on damage scenarios for residential buildings in Catania city. J Seismol 3 (1999) 327-343
17. Rota M. Advances in the derivation of fragility curves for masonry buildings. PhD thesis, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), Pavia, Italy, 2007.
18. Dolce M, Zuccaro G, Kappos A, Coburn AW. Report of the EAEE working group 3: vulnerability and risk analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on earthquake engineering, vol. 4, Vienna, 1994. p. 3049-77.
19. Working Group. Redazione della mappa di pericolosità sismica prevista dall'Ordinanza PCM 3274 del 20 marzo 2003. Rapporto conclusivo per il Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, INGV, Milano-Roma, aprile 2004, 65 pp. +5 appendici [in Italian].
20. Guagenti E, Petrini V. Il caso delle vecchie costruzioni: Verso una nuova legge danni-intensità. In: Proceedings of the fourth Italian conference on earthquake engineering, vol. I, Milano, 1989. p. 145-53 [in Italian].
21. Murphy J.R., and O'Brien L.J. The correlation of peak ground acceleration amplitude with seismic intensity and other physical parameters. Bull Seismol Soc Am 67 (1977) 877-915
22. McCann M.W.J.R., Sauter F., and Shah H.C. A technical note on PGA-Intensity relations with applications to damage estimation. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70 2 (1980) 631-637
23. Sabetta F., and Pugliese A. Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from Italian strong-motion records. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77 5 (1987) 1491-1513
24. Hamburger R, Rojahn C, Moehle J, Bachman R, Comartin C, Whittaker A. The ATC-58 Project: development of next-generation performance-based earthquake engineering design criteria for buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2004. Paper 1819.
25. Coburn A.W., and Spence R.J.S. Earthquake protection. 2nd ed (2002), Wiley, New York
26. In: Grünthal G. (Ed). European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS 1998) (1998), Council of Europe, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Sismologie 15
27. Dolce M., Masi A., and Goretti A. Damage to buildings due to 1997 Umbria-Marche earthquake. In: Bernardini (Ed). Seismic damage to masonry buildings (1999), Balkema, Rotterdam
28. ISTAT 2001 census, 〈http://dawinci.istat.it/jsp/MD/dawinciMD.jsp〉.
29. Bramerini F, Di Pasquale G, Orsini G, Pugliese A, Romeo R, Sabetta F. Rischio sismico del territorio Italiano. Proceedings of the seventh Italian conference on earthquake engineering, Siena, 1995 [in Italian].
30. Whitman RV, Reed JW, Hong S-T. Earthquake damage probability matrices. In: Proceedings of the fifth WCEE, Rome, 1973.
31. Pinto P.E., Giannini R., and Franchin P. Methods for seismic reliability analysis of structures (2004), IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy
32. Singhal A., and Kiremidjian A. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. J Struct Eng 122 (1996) 1459-1467
33. Levenberg K. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quart Appl Math 2 2 (1944) 164-168
34. Marquardt D.W. An algorithm for the least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J Appl Math 11 2 (1963) 431-441
35. Efron B., and Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap (1994), Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
36. Rota M, Penna A, Strobbia C. Typological fragility curves from Italian earthquake damage data. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
37. Di Pasquale G., Orsini G., and Romeo R.W. New developments in seismic risk assessment in Italy. Bull Earthquake Eng 3 (2005) 101-128
38. OPCM 3519 28 aprile 2006. Criteri generali per l'individuazione delle zone sismiche e per la formazione e l'aggiornamento degli elenchi delle medesime zone. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, n. 108, 11 maggio 2006.
39. Dall'Ara A. Incertezza e variabilità nella determinazione della risposta sismica locale. PhD thesis, Politecnico of Torino, 2007 [in Italian].
40. Angeletti et al. Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica degli edifici, con particolare riferimento a quelli strategici per la protezione civile-Rapporto finale della commissione tecnico-scientifica per l'aggiornamento dell'inventario e della vulnerabilità, 2004. [in Italian].
41. Zuccaro G, editor. Report Progetto SAVE, Task 1-Inventario e vulnerabilità del patrimonio edilizio residenziale del territorio nazionale, mappe di rischio e perdite socio-economiche, 2005 [in Italian].
42. Zuccaro G, Cacace F. Le nuove mappe di rischio sismico a scala nazionale. Proceedings of the 12th Italian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Pisa, 2007 [in Italian].