A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 573-592

  Fajfar, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; NONLINEARITY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 0001430832     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1586128     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1996, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Vol. 1, ATC 40, Redwood City, CA.
2. ATC, 1997, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 273), and NEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (FEMA 274), developed by the Building Seismic Safety Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
3. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, CD-ROM, Paper 1561, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
4. Bertero, V.V., 1995, Tri-service manual methods, in Vision 2000, Part 2, Appendix J, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA.
5. CEN, 1994, Eurocode 8 - Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures, European prestandards ENV 1998, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
6. Chai, Y. H., Fajfar, P., and Romstad, K. M, 1998, Formulation of duration-dependent inelastic seismic design spectrum, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 124, 913-921.
7. Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., 1999, Capacity-demand-diagram methods for estimating seismic deformation of inelastic structures: SDF systems, Report PEER-1999/02, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
8. Cosenza, E. and Manfredi, G., 1992, Seismic analysis of degrading models by means of damage functions concept, in Nonlinear Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, Eds., Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York, 77-93.
9. Fajfar, P., 1992, Equivalent ductility factors, taking into account low-cycle fatigue, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 21, 837-848.
10. Fajfar, P., 1999, Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, 979-993.
11. th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paris, CD-ROM, Balkema, Rotterdam.
12. Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M., 1987, Non-linear seismic analysis of RC buildings: Implications of a case study, European Earthquake Engineering, 1, 31-43.
13. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Kyoto, 1988, Maruzen, Tokyo, V, 111-116.
14. Fajfar, P. and Gašperšič, P., 1996, The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25, 23-67.
15. Fajfar, P., Gašperšič, P., Drobnič, D., 1997, A simplified nonlinear method for seismic damage analysis of structures, in Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, 183-194.
16. Fajfar, P. and Krawinkler, H., editors, 1997, Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, Balkema, Rotterdam.
17. st U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, EERI, Berkeley, CA, 113-122.
18. th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, CD-ROM, EERI, Oakland, CA.
19. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H., 2000, Estimation of seismic drift demands for frame structures, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29, in press.
20. Krawinkler, H. and Seneviratna, G.D.P.K., 1998, Pros and cons of a pushover analysis for seismic performance evaluation, Engineering Structures, 20, 452-464.
21. McCabe, S. L. and Hall, W. J., 1989, Assessment of seismic structural damage, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 115, 2166-2183.
22. Miranda, E., 1993, Site-dependent strength-reduction factors, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119, 3503-3519.
23. th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, CD-ROM, Paper 1096, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
24. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V. V., 1994, Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake resistant design, Earthquake Spectra, 10, 357-379.
25. Prakash, V., Powell, G. H., and Campbell, S., 1993, DRAIN-2DX Base program description and user guide, Version 1.10, Report No. UCB/SEMM-93/17&18, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
26. Rahnama, M. and Krawinkler, H., 1993, Effects of soft soil and hysteresis model on seismic demands, Report No. 108, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
27. Reinhorn, A. M., 1997, Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations, in Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, 277-287.
28. Riddell, R., 1995, Inelastic design spectra accounting for soil conditions, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24, 1491-1510.
29. Saiidi, M. and Sozen, M. A., 1981, Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 107, 937-952.
30. Tolis, S. V. and Faccioli, E., 1999, Displacement design spectra, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3, 107-125.
31. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P., and Fischinger, M., 1994, Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23, 502-521.
32. Whittaker, A., Constantinou, M., and Tsopelas, P., 1998, Displacement estimates for performance-based seismic design, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 124, 905-912.