Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Multi-Span Continuous Highway Bridge Fitted with Shape Memory Alloy Bars and Laminated Rubber Bearings

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1379-1404

  Rahman Bhuiyan, M A ^a   Alam, M Shahria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; LAMINATING; NONMETALLIC BEARINGS; RUBBER; SEISMOLOGY; SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT;

ANALYTICAL SIMULATIONS; BRIDGE SYSTEMS; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ISOLATION BEARINGS; LAMINATED RUBBER BEARINGS; LONGITUDINAL DIRECTION; MULTI-SPANS; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY BARS; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS;

BEARINGS (STRUCTURAL);

EID: 84869115028     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: 19448201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.4000089     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abe M., Yoshida J., and Fujino Y., 2004. Multiaxial behaviors of laminated rubber bearings and their modeling. I: Experimental study, J. Struct. Eng. 130, 1119–1132.
2. Ali H. M., and Abdel-Ghaffar A. M., 1995. Modeling of rubber and lead passive-control bearings for seismic analysis, J. Struct. Eng. 121, 1134–1144.
3. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2000. Guide Specification for Seismic Isolation Design, 2nd Edition, Washington D. C.
4. ANSYS, Inc., 2010. ANSYS version 12.0. Canonsburg, PA.
5. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1985. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Report No. ATC-13, Redwood City, CA.
6. Auricchio F., and Sacco E., 1997. A superelastic shape-memory-alloy beam model, J. Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 8, 489–501.
7. Auricchio F., Taylor R. L., and Lubliner J., 1997. Shape-memory alloys: Macromodeling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 146, 281–312.
8. Basöz N., Kiremidjian A. S., King S. A., and Law K. H., 1999. Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, earthquake, Earthquake Spectra 15, 25–53.
9. Basoz N., and Mander J. B., 1999. Enhancement of the Lifeline Transportation Module in HAZUS, Report No. Draft #7, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D. C.
10. Bhuiyan A. R., Okui Y., Mitamura H., and Imai T., 2009. A rheology model of high damping rubber bearings for seismic analysis: Identification of nonlinear viscosity, Intl. J. Solids Struct. 46, 1778–1792.
11. Bhuiyan A. R., 2009. Rheology Modeling of Laminated Rubber Bearings, Ph.D. Thesis, Saitama University, Japan.
12. Billah A. H. M., Alam M. S., and Bhuiyan A. R., 2010. Seismic performance of a multi-span bridge fitted with superelastic SMA-based isolator, Intl. Proc. IABSE-JSCE Joint Conference on Advances in Bridge Engineering-II, August 8–10, 2010, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
13. Brandenberg S. J., Zhang J., Kashighandi P., Huo Y., and Zhao M., 2011. Demand Fragility Surfaces for Bridges in Liquefied and Laterally Spreading Ground, PEER Report 2011/01, 162 pp.
14. Buckle I. G., and Mayes R. L., 1990. Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance–a world view, Earthquake Spectra 6, 161–201.
15. Chaudhary M. T. A., Abe M., and Fujino Y., 2001. Performance evaluation of base- isolated Yama-agé bridge with high damping rubber bearings using recorded seismic data, Engineering Structures 23, 902–910.
16. Chaudhary M. T. A., Abe M., Fujino Y., and Yoshida J., 2000. System identification of two base-isolated bridges using seismic records, J. Struct. Eng. 126, 1187–1195.
17. Choi E., DesRoches R., and Nielson B. G., 2004. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones, Engineering Structures 26, 187–199.
18. Choi E., Nam T.-H., and Cho B.-S., 2005. A new concept of isolation bearings for highway steel bridges using shape memory alloys, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineers 32, 957–967.
19. Dall'Asta A., and Ragni L., 2006. Experimental tests and analytical model of high damping rubber dissipating devices, Engineering Structures 28, 1874–1884.
20. DesRoches R., and Delemont M., 2002. Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys, Engineering Structures 24, 325–332.
21. Dicleli M., and Baddaram S., 2006. Effect of isolator and ground motion characteristics on the performance of seismic-isolated bridges, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 35, 233–250.
22. Dolce M., Cardone D., and Marnetto R., 2000. Implementation and testing of passive control devices based on shape memory alloys, Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics 29, 945–968.
23. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 2003. HAZUS-MH Software, Washington, D.C.
24. Ghobarah A., and Ali H. M., 1988. Seismic performance of highway bridges, Engineering Structures 10, 157–166.
25. Ghobarah A., 1988. Seismic behavior of highway bridges with base isolation, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 15, 72–78.
26. Graesser E.J., and Cozzarelli F.A., 1991. Shape memory alloys as new materials for aseismic isolation, J. Eng.Mech, 117, 2590–608.
27. Hwang H., Jernigan J.B., and Lin Y.-W., 2000. Evaluation of seismic damage to memphis bridges and highway systems, J Bridge Eng 5, 322–30.
28. Hwang H., Liu J.B., and Chiu Y.-H., 2001. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges, MAEC report: project MAEC RR-4. Urbana: Mid-America Earthquake Center.
29. Hwang J.-S., Wu J.D., Pan T.C., and Yang G., 2002. A mathematical hysteretic model for elastomeric isolation bearings, Earthq. Eng.Struct. Dyn. 31, 771–789.
30. Imbsen R.A., 2001. Use of isolation for seismic retrofitting bridges, J Bridge Eng 6, 425–438.
31. Japan Road Association (JRA), 2002. Specifications for highway bridges, Part V: Seismic design, Tokyo, Japan.
32. Karim K.R., and Yamazaki F., 2007. Effect of isolation on fragility curves of highway bridges based on simplified approach, Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 27, 414–426.
33. Karim K.R., and Yamazaki F., 2001. Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation,. Earthquake. Eng Struct. Dyn 30, 1839–1856.
34. Kelly J.M., 1997. Earthquake resistant design with rubber, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, New York.
35. Kikuchi M., and Aiken I.D., 1997. An analytical hysteresis model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings, Earthquake. Eng Struct. Dyn. 26, 215–231.
36. Mackie K. R., and Stojadinovic B., 2007. Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limits States, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 36, 1953–1971.
37. Mackie K. R, and Stojadinovic B., 2004. Fragility curves for reinforced concrete highway overpass bridges, Proc. of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Paper No. 1553.
38. Melchers RE., Structural Reliability, Analysis and Prediction, 2nd ed. John Wiley& Sons; 1999.
39. Naeim F., and Kelly J., 1996. Design of seismic isolated structures, 1st edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
40. Nielson B., 2005. Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones, Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
41. Nielson B., and DesRoches R., 2007a. Seismic fragility curves for typical highway bridge classes in the Central and Southeastern United States, Earthquake Spectra 23, 615–633.
42. Nielson B.G., and DesRoches R., 2007b. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 36, 823–839
43. Ozbulut O.E., and Hurlebaus S., 2010. Evaluation of the performance of a sliding-type base isolation system with a NiTi shape memory alloy device considering temperature effects, Engineering Structures 32, 238–249.
44. Ozbulut O.E., and Hurlebaus S., 2011a. Optimal design of superelastic-friction base isolators for seismic protection of highway bridges against near-field earthquakes, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 40, 273–291.
45. Ozbulut O.E., and Hurlebaus S., 2011b. Seismic assessment of bridge structures isolated by a shape memory alloy/rubber-based isolation system, Smart Materials and Structures 20, 015003.
46. Padgett J.E., and DesRoches R., 2008. Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges, Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn. 37, 157–174.
47. Priestley M.J.N., Seible F., and Calvi C. M., 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
48. Robinson W.H., 1982. Lead rubber hysteresis bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 10, 593–604.
49. SeismoStruct, 2011. SeismoStruct help file, available from http://www.seismsoft.com.
50. Shinozuka M., Feng M. Q., Lee J., and Naganuma T., 2000a. Statistical analysis of fragility curves, J. Eng Mech 126, 1224–31
51. Shinozuka M, Feng M. Q., Kim H.-K., and Kim S.-H., 2000b. Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development, J.Eng Mech. 126, 1287–1295.
52. Skinner R. I., Robinson W. H., and McVerry G. H., 1993. An Introduction to Seismic Isolation, DSIR Physical Science, Wellington, New Zealand.
53. Wei Z., Ma H., and Sun D., 2002. A mathematical model for pseudoelasticity of shape memory alloy and its application in passive control, Journal of Vibration and Control 8, 41–49.
54. Wilde K., Gardoni P., and Fujino Y., 2000. Base isolation system with shape memory alloy device for elevated highway bridges, Engineering Structures 22, 222–229.
55. Yamazaki F., Motomura H., and Hamada T., 2000. Damage assessment of expressway networks in Japan based on seismic monitoring, Proc. of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, CD-ROM, 2000, Paper No. 0551.
56. Zhang Y., Hu X., and Zhu S., 2009. Seismic performance of benchmark base-isolated bridges with superelastic Cu-Al-Be restraining damping device, Structural Control and Health Monitoring 16, 668–685.
57. Zhang J., and Huo Y., 2009. Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method, Engineering Structures 31, 1648–1660.