Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-12

  Argyroudis, S A ^a   Pitilakis, K D ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

1D ground response analysis; Fragility curves; Numerical analysis; Seismic vulnerability; Shallow tunnels

Indexed keywords

ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS; CLOSED FORM SOLUTIONS; DISTINCTIVE FEATURES; EQUIVALENT-LINEAR; FRAGILITY CURVES; GROUND RESPONSE; INPUT MOTIONS; METRO TUNNEL; NUMERICAL APPROACHES; QUASI-STATIC CONDITIONS; QUASI-STATIC METHODS; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; SEISMIC GROUND; SEISMIC INTENSITY; SEISMIC LOADINGS; SEISMIC VULNERABILITY; SHALLOW TUNNEL; SOIL CONDITIONS; SOIL PROPERTY; STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS;

DEPOSITS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SUBWAYS;

SEISMOLOGY;

ALLUVIAL DEPOSIT; DEFORMATION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; LOADING; NUMERICAL METHOD; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL PROPERTY; STRENGTH; TUNNEL DESIGN;

EID: 84855237097     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Lifelines Alliance (ALA), Seismic Fragility Formulations for Water Systems, part 1- Guideline, ASCE-FEMA, Reston, VA2001, 104 p.
2. Amorosi A., Boldini D. Numerical modelling of the transverse dynamic behaviour of circular tunnels in clayey soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2009, 29:1059-1072.
3. ATC-13, Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, 1985.
4. Argyroudis, S. Contribution to seismic vulnerability and risk of transportation networks in urban environment, PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, 2010.
5. Bardet J.P., Ichii K., Lin C.H. EERA: A Computer Program for Equivalent-Linear Earthquake Site Response Analyses of Layered Soil Deposits, University of Southern California 2000, Department of Civil Engineering, 40 p.
6. Bobet A. Effect of pore water pressure on tunnel support during static and seismic loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2003, 18:377-393.
7. Choi E., DesRoches R., Nielson B. Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones. Engineering Structures 2004, 26:187-199.
8. Darendeli, MB. Development of new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin, 2001.
9. Dowding C.H., Rozen A. Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division 1978, 104:175-191.
10. EC8 Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance 2004, European Committee for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium, The European Standard EN 1998-1.
11. Gazetas G., Gerolymos N., Anastasopoulos I. Response of three Athens metro underground structures in the 1999 Parnitha earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2005, 25:617-633.
12. Hashash Y.A., Hook J., Schmidt B., Chiangyao J. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2001, 16:247-293.
13. Hashash Y.A., Park D., Chiangyao J. Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2005, 20:435-441.
14. Kappos A., Panagopoulos G., Panagiotopoulos Ch., Penelis G. A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2006, 4:391-413.
15. Karim K.R., Yamazaki F. Effect of earthquake ground motions on fragility curves of highway bridge piers based on numerical simulation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001, 30:1839-1856.
16. Kramer, G, Sedarat, H, Kozak, A, Liu, A, Chai, J. Seismic response of precast tunnel linings, in: Proceedings of Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference, Toronto, 2007.
17. Moschonas I., Kappos A., Panetsos P., Papadopoulos V., Makarios T., Thanopoulos P. Seismic fragility curves for Greek bridges: methodology and case studies. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2009, 7:439-468.
18. Nagar H., Hinchberger S.D., Nagar M.H. Simplified analysis of seismic in-plane stresses in composite and jointed tunnel linings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2008, 28:1063-1077.
19. NIBS HAZUS-MH: Technical Manuals 2004, Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Building Science, Washington, DC.
20. Nielson B.G., DesRoches R. Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dymamics 2007, 36:823-839.
21. Owen, GN, Scholl, RE. Earthquake engineering of large underground structures, in report No. FHWA/RD-80/195, Federal Highway Administration and National Science Foundation, (1981) 279p.
22. Pakbaz M., Yareevandb A. 2-D Analysis of circular tunnel against earthquake loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2005, 20:411-417.
23. Paolucci, R, Pitilakis, K. Seismic risk assessment of underground structures under transient ground deformations, in: K. Pitilakis (Ed.), Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering: 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering - Invited Lectures, Springer, Netherlands, 2007, pp. 433-459.
24. Park K.H., Tantayopin K., Tontavanich B., Owatsiriwong A. Analytical solution for seismic-induced ovaling of circular tunnel lining under no-slip interface conditions: a revisit. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2009, 24:231-235.
25. Penzien J. Seismically induced raking of tunnel linings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000, 29:683-691.
26. Pinto, PE (Ed.), Probabilistic methods for seismic assessment of existing structures, LESSLOSS Report No. 2007/06, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia, IUSS Press, 2007.
27. Pitilakis, K, Tsinidis, G. Seismic design of large, long underground structures: metro and parking stations, highway tunnels, in: Proceedings of International Geotechnical Conference: Geotechnical Challenges in Megacities (GEOMOS2010), Moscow, 2010.
28. Plaxis 2D, Reference Manual, version 7, 1998.
29. Power, M, Rosidi, D, Kaneshiro, J, Gilstrap, S, Chiou, SJ. (1998) "Summary and Εvaluation of Procedures for the Seismic Design of Tunnels", Final Report for Task 112-D-5.3(c), MCEER Highway Project, Sponsored by US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, FWHA Contract Number DTFH61-92-C-00112.
30. Salmon, M, Wang, J, Jones, D, Wu, Ch. Fragility formulations for the BART system, in: Proceedings of the 6th U.S. Conference on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, TCLEE, Long Beach, 2003.
31. Schnabel, PB, Lysmer, J, Seed, HB. SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report No. UCB/EERC-72/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, December, (1972)102p.
32. Sedarat H., Kozak A., Hashash Y.M.A., Shamsabadi A., Krimotat A. Contact interface in seismic analysis of circular tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 2009, 24:482-490.
33. Sharma S., Judd W.R. Underground opening damage from earthquakes. Engineering Geology 1991, 30:263-276.
34. Shinozuka, M. The Hanshin-Awaji earthquake of January 17, 1995: performance of lifelines, Technical Report NCEER-95-0015, 1995.
35. Shinozuka M., Feng M.Q., Kim H.-K., Kim S.-H. Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 2000, 126:1287-1296.
36. John C.M., Zahrah T.F. Aseismic design of underground structures. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology 1987, 2:165-197.
37. Wang J.M. The distribution of earthquake damage to underground facilities during the 1976 Tang-Shan earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 1985, 1:741-757.
38. Wang J.N. Seismic Design of Tunnels. A Simple State-of-the-Art Design Approach, Monograph 7 1993, Quade & Diuglas Inc., New York, Parsons, Brinckerhoff.