Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data

Engineering Structures

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1241-1263

  Rossetto, T ^a   Elnashai, A ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Limit states; Observational damage data; RC buildings; Vulnerability curves

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMOLOGY;

VULNERABILITY FUNCTIONS;

CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION;

REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC HAZARD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 0038603088     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Spence R.J.S. Coburn A.W. Pomonis A. Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale Proceedings of the 10th World Conference Of Earthquake Engineering 1992 551-556 AA Balkema Rotterdam
2. Medvev S. Sponheuer W. MSK Scale of seismic intensity Proceedings of the 4th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Chilean Association of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, vol 1 1969 A2
3. Orsini G. A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI) Earthquake Spectra 15 3 1999 463-483
4. Yamazaki F. Murao O. Vulnerability functions for Japanese buildings based on damage data from the 1995 Kobe earthquake Implication of Recent Earthquakes on Seismic Risk, Series on Innovation and Construction: Imperial College Press 2 2000 91-102
5. Architectural Institute of Japan. Preliminary report of the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake, (english edition). Tokyo, April 1995.
6. Miyakoshi J., Hayashi Y., Tamura K., Fukuwa N. Damage ratio functions of buildings using damage data of the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu Earthquake. ICOSSAR 1997.
7. Applied Technology Council Report ATC-13. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Palo Alto, 1985.
8. Onose J.-I. Prediction of damage ratio of reinforced concrete buildings due to earthquakes and comparison with actual damage ratio Proceedings of the 6th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo 1982 2081-2088
9. Singhal A. Kiremidjian A.S. A method for earthquake motion-damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames 1997 National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Report NCEER-97-0008 State University of New York at Buffalo
10. Park Y.-J. Ang A.H.-S. Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings ASCE, Journal of Structural Engineering 111(ST4) 1985 740-757
11. Mosalam K.M. Ayala G. White R.N. Roth C. Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1 4 1997 693-719
12. Pomonis A., Coburn A.W., Spence R.J.S. Strong ground motion and damage to masonry buildings as revealed by damage surveys near recording instruments. The Martin Centre for Architectural and Urban Studies, Internal Report, Cambridge, April 1992.
13. Applied Technology Council Report ATC-40. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Redwood City, 1996.
14. Priestley M.J.N. Displacement-based approaches to rational limit states design of new structures Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering 1998 AA Balkema Rotterdam
15. Algermissen S.T. Steinbrugge K.V. Earthquake losses to buildings in the San Francisco Bay area Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Microzonation for Safer Construction-Research and Application, National Science Foundation, San Francisco, vol. 1 1978 291-302
16. Reitherman R. A review of earthquake damage estimation methods Earthquake Spectra 1 4 1985 805-847
17. Federal Emergency Management Agency. HAZUS user and technical manuals. Federal Emergency Management Agency Report: HAZUS 1999, Washington D.C., Vol. 7, 1999.
18. Structural Engineering Association of California (SEOAC). Vision 2000. Seismology Committee, Structural Engineering Association of California, CA, April 1995.
19. Federal Emergency Management Agency. NEHRP Guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency Report: FEMA 273. Washington D.C., 1997.
20. Conseil de L'Europe. European macroseismic scale 1998 (EMS-98). Cahier du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie, G. Grünthal, editor. Luxemburg, Vol. 15, 1998.
21. Applied Technology Council Report ATC-21. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: A handbook. Palo Alto, 1988.
22. Earthquake Planning and Protection Organisation (EPPO). Post-earthquake building safety classification. Ministry of Environment, Planning and Public Works, Athens, 1998.
23. Rossetto T. Vulnerability curves for the seismic assessment of RC buildings. PhD Thesis to be submitted, Imperial College, London, 2003.
24. Kircher C.A. Nassar A.A. Kustu O. Holmes W.T. Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation Earthquake Spectra 13 4 1997 663-681
25. Ferritto J.M. An economic analysis of earthquake design levels for new concrete construction. Department of the Navy Civil Engineering Laboratory Report No. N-1671, Port Hueneme, 1983.
26. Division of the State Architect. Earthquake hazard mitigation technology: application guidelines and recommendations. Sacramento, 1996.
27. Poland C. Developing performance-based seismic engineering for use in professional practice Pacific Engineering Research Center, PEER Center News 2 1 1999
28. StatSoft. Inc. STATISTICA V.5.0 for Windows: computer program manual. Tulsa OK, 1995.
29. Ambraseys N.N. Simpson K.A. Bommer J.J. Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 25 1996 371-400
30. Boore D.M. Joyner W.B. Fumal T.E. Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work Seismological Research Letters 68 1 1997 129-151
31. Youngs R.R. Chiou S.-J. Silva W.J. Humphrey J.R. Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes Seismological Research Letters 68 1997 59-73
32. Borzi B. Elnashai A.S. Faccioli E. Calvi G.M. Bommer J.J. Inelastic spectra and ductility-damping relationships for displacement-based design 1998 Imperial College London ESEE Research Report No 98-4
33. Rossetto T. The Bhuj (NW India) earthquake of 26 January 2001 2001 Imperial College London ESEE Research Report No. 01-2 (CD-Rom)