Simplified pushover-based earthquake loss assessment (SP-BELA) method for masonry buildings

International Journal of Architectural Heritage

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 353-376

  Borzi, Barbara ^a   Crowley, Helen ^a   Pinho, Rui ^b  

^a European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE)   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Loss estimation; Masonry buildings; Simplified pushover; Vulnerability assessment; Vulnerability curves

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKES; REINFORCED CONCRETE;

LOSS ESTIMATION; MASONRY BUILDING; SIMPLIFIED PUSHOVER; VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS; VULNERABILITY CURVES;

MASONRY CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 84973647647     PISSN: 15583058     EISSN: 15583066     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15583050701828178     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abrams, D. P. 1997. Response of unreinforced masonry buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1(1):257-273.
2. Anthoine, A., Magenes, G., and Magonettee, G. 1994. Shear compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vienna, Austria, 1994.
3. Benedetti, D., and Petrini, V. 1984. Sulla vulnerabilitàsismica di edifici in muratura: Proposta su un metodo di valutazione. L’industria delle Costruzioni 149: 66-74.
4. Bernardini, A., Gori, R., and Modena, C. 1990. An application of coupled analytical models and experimental knowledge for seismic vulnerability analyses of masonry buildings. Engineering Aspects of Earthquake Phenomena 3:161-180.
5. Borzi, B., Pinho, R., and Crowley, H. In press. Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large scale assessment of RC buildings. Engineering Structures 30(3):804-820.
6. Bosilijkov, V., Page, A., Bokan-Bosilijkov, V., and Zarnic, R. 2003. Performance based studies of in-plane loaded unreinforced masonry walls. Masonry International 16(2):39-50.
7. Braga, F., Dolce, M., and Liberatore, D. 1982. Southern Italy November 23, 1980 earthquake: Section 5Astatistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the MSK-76 scale. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Athens, Greece, 1982.
8. Calvi, G. M. 1999. A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 3(3):411-438.
9. CEN. 2003. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Final draft, December 2003.
10. Crowley, H., Pinho, R., and Bommer, J. J. 2004. A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2(2):173-219.
11. Cosenza, E., Manfredi, G., Polese, M., and Verderame, G. M. 2005. A multi-level approach to the capacity assessment of existing RC buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 9(1):1-22.
12. D’Ayala, D., and Speranza, E. 2002. An integrated procedure for the assessment of seismic vulnerability of masonry structures. In Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, England, 1982. paper no. 561.
13. D’Ayala, D., and Speranza, E. 2003. Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of masonry structures. Earthquake Spectra 19(3):479-509.
14. Doherty, K. T., Griffith, M. C., Lam, N., and Wilson, J. 2002. Displacement-based seismic analysis for out-of-plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31:833-850.
15. Di Pasquale, G., Orsini, G., and Romeo, R. W. 2005. New developments in seismic risk assessment in Italy. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 3(1):101-128.
16. Dolce, M., Masi, A., Marino, M., and Vona, M. 2003. Earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock or Potenza (Southern Italy) including site effects. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1(1):115-140.
17. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 1999. HAZUS 99. Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. Technical Manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
18. Glaister, S., and Pinho, R. 2003. Development of a simplified deformation-based method for seismic vulnerability assessment. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 7(1):107-140.
19. Guagenti, E., and Petrini, V. 1989. The case of old buildings: towards a damage-intensity relationship [in Italian]. Proceedings of the 4th Italian National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Milan, 145-153.
20. Helton, L. C., and Davis, F. J. 2003. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analysis of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 81:23-69.
21. Magenes, G., Bolognini, D., and Baggio, C. 2000. Metodi semplificati per l’analisi sismica non lineare di edifici in muratura. Rome, Italy: CNR-Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti. Available at: http://gndt.ingv.it/Pubblicazioni/Magenes_copertina_con_intestazione.htm (accessedMay 2007).
22. Magenes, G., and Della Fontana, A. 1998. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Proceedings of the British Masonry Society 8:190-195.
23. Magenes, G., Kingsley, G. R., and Calvi, G. M. 1997. Seismic testing of a full-scale, two-story masonry building: Test procedure and measure experimental response. Rome, Italy: Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti.
24. Margottini, C., Molin, D., Narcisi, B., and Serva, L. 1992. Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data, Engineering Geology 33:45-48.
25. Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri (OPCM). 2003. Primi Elementi in Materia di Criteri Generali per la Classificazione Sismica del Territorio Nazionale e di Normative Tecniche per le Costruzioni in Zona Sismica. G.U. n. 72 del 8-5-2003, n, 3274 del 20 Marzo 20, 2003.
26. Pinho, R., Bommer, J. J., and Glaister, S. 2002. A simplified approach to displacement-based earthquake loss estimation analysis. In Proceeding of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, England, paper no. 738.
27. Restrepo-Vélez, L. F. 2003. A simplified mechanics-based procedure for the seismic risk assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings. Individual Study. Pavia, Italy: ROSE School.
28. Restrepo-Vélez, L. F., and Magenes, G. 2004. Simplified procedure for the seismic risk assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada, paper no. 2561.
29. Restrepo-Vélez, L. F., and Magenes, G. 2005a. Experimental testing in support of a mechanicsbased procedure for the seismic risk evaluation of unreinforced masonry buildings. In International Seminar SAHC 2004 Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Vol. 2, eds., Modena, C., Lourenço, P.B., and Roca P. London, England, Taylor and Francis, 1079-1089.
30. Restrepo-Vélez, L.F., and Magenes, G. 2005b. A mechanics-based methodology for the evaluation of the seismic risk of unreinforced masonry buildings. ROSE Research Report No. 2005/05.
31. RISK-UE 2001. An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with application to different European towns. Available at: www.risk-ue.net (accessed May 2007).
32. Rossetto, T., and Elnashai, A. 2005. A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures, Engineering Structures 7(3):397-409.
33. Tomazevic, M., Lutman, M., Weiss, P., and Velechovsky, T. 1992. The influence of rigidity of floors on the seismic resistance of old masonry buildings. Ljubljana, Slovenia.