Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 570-580

  Kopperdahl, David L ^a   Aspelund, Thor ^b,c   Hoffmann, Paul F ^a   Sigurdsson, Sigurdur ^b   Siggeirsdottir, Kristin ^b   Harris, Tamara B ^d   Gudnason, Vilmundur ^b,c   Keaveny, Tony M ^a,e  

^a ON Diagnostics   (United States)

^b ICELANDIC HEART ASSOCIATION   (Iceland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

biomechanics; bone QCT; fracture risk assessment; osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; BONE QCT; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS;

AGED; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; SPINAL FRACTURES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84894471925     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: 15234681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2069     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. King AB, Fiorentino DM., Medicare payment cuts for osteoporosis testing reduced use despite tests' benefit in reducing fractures. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011; 30 (12): 2362-70.
2. Siris ES, Pasquale MK, Wang Y, Watts NB., Estimating bisphosphonate use and fracture reduction among US women aged 45 years and older, 2001-2008. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26 (1): 3-11.
3. Lewiecki EM, Laster AJ, Miller PD, Bilezikian JP., More bone density testing is needed, not less. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27 (4): 739-42.
4. Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM., Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone. 2003; 33 (4): 744-50.
5. Imai K, Ohnishi I, Yamamoto S, Nakamura K., In vivo assessment of lumbar vertebral strength in elderly women using computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element model. Spine. 2008; 33 (1): 27-32.
6. Dall'Ara E, Pahr D, Varga P, Kainberger F, Zysset P., QCT-based finite element models predict human vertebral strength in vitro significantly better than simulated DEXA. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23 (2): 563-72.
7. Keyak JH., Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Eng Phys. 2001; 23 (3): 165-73.
8. Roberts BJ, Kopperdahl DL, Thrall E, Muller JA, Keaveny TM, Bouxsein ML., Prediction of femoral strength in a sideways fall configuration using QCT-based finite element analysis. Bone. 2009; 44 (S1): S72.
9. Bessho M, Ohnishi I, Matsuyama J, Matsumoto T, Imai K, Nakamura K., Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. J Biomech. 2007; 40 (8): 1745-53.
10. Schileo E, Taddei F, Cristofolini L, Viceconti M., Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. J Biomech. 2008; 41 (2): 356-67.
11. Koivumaki JE, Thevenot J, Pulkkinen P, et al. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. Bone. 2012; 50 (4): 824-9.
12. Dall'Ara E, Luisier B, Schmidt R, Kainberger F, Zysset P, Pahr D., A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro. Bone. 2013; 52 (1): 27-38.
13. Wang X, Sanyal A, Cawthon PM, et al. Prediction of new clinical vertebral fractures in elderly men using finite element analysis of CT scans. J Bone Miner Res. 2012; 27 (4): 808-16.
14. Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM, et al. Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Miner Res. 2009; 24 (3): 475-83.
15. Keyak JH, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir G, et al. Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study. Bone. 2011; 48 (6): 1239-45.
16. Faulkner KG, Cann CE, Hasegawa BH., Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: assessment with patient-specific nonlinear finite element analysis. Radiology. 1991; 179 (3): 669-74.
17. Melton LJ, Riggs BL, Keaveny TM, et al. Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22 (12): 1885-92.
18. Melton LJ 3rd, Riggs BL, Keaveny TM, et al. Relation of vertebral deformities to bone density, structure, and strength. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25 (9): 1922-30.
19. Graeff C, Marin F, Petto H, et al. High resolution quantitative computed tomography-based assessment of trabecular microstructure and strength estimates by finite-element analysis of the spine, but not DXA, reflects vertebral fracture status in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Bone. 2012; 52 (2): 568-77.
20. Amin S, Kopperdahl DL, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Association of hip strength estimates by finite-element analysis with fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26 (7): 1593-600.
21. Block JE, Smith R, Gluer CC, Steiger P, Ettinger B, Genant HK., Models of spinal trabecular bone loss as determined by quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 1989; 4 (2): 249-57.
22. Khoo BC, Brown K, Cann C, et al. Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 20 (9): 1539-45.
23. Harris TB, Launer LJ, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165 (9): 1076-87.
24. Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Sigurdsson G, et al. Inaccuracy in self-report of fractures may underestimate association with health outcomes when compared with medical record based fracture registry. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007; 22 (9): 631-9.
25. Genant HK, Wu CY, Vankuijk C, Nevitt MC., Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993; 8 (9): 1137-48.
26. Kopperdahl DL, Morgan EF, Keaveny TM., Quantitative computed tomography estimates of the mechanical properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20 (4): 801-5.
27. Bouxsein ML, Melton LJ 3rd, Riggs BL, et al. Age- and sex-specific differences in the factor of risk for vertebral fracture: a population-based study using QCT. J Bone Miner Res. 2006; 21 (9): 1475-82.
28. Wilson S., Development of a model to predict the compressive forces on the spine associated with age-related vertebral fractures [dissertation]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1994.
29. van den Kroonenberg AJ, Hayes WC, McMahon TA., Dynamic models for sideways falls from standing height. J Biomech Eng. 1995; 117 (3): 309-18.
30. Cann CE, Genant HK, Kolb FO, Ettinger B., Quantitative computed tomography for prediction of vertebral fracture risk. Bone. 1985; 6: 1-7.
31. Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, et al. Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. J Clin Densitom. 2008; 11 (1): 123-62.
32. ACR practice guideline for the performance of quantitative computed tomography (qct) bone densitometry. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2008.
33. Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, et al. Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int. 1998; 8 (5): 468-89.
34. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. World Health Organization technical report series. 1994; 843: 1-129.
35. Lewiecki EM, Gordon CM, Baim S, et al. International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2007 adult and pediatric official positions. Bone. 2008; 43 (6): 1115-21.
36. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Melton LJ 3rd, Khaltaev N., A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis. Bone. 2008; 42 (3): 467-75.
37. Ferrar L, Jiang G, Cawthon PM, et al. Identification of vertebral fracture and non-osteoporotic short vertebral height in men: the MrOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 2007; 22 (9): 1434-41.
38. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS., Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med. 2008; 27 (2): 157-72; discussion 207-12.
39. Buckley JM, Loo K, Motherway J., Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength. Bone. 2007; 40 (3): 767-74.
40. Imai K, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, Yamamoto S, Nakamura K., Assessment of vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects of alendronate in postmenopausal women using a quantitative computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method. Osteoporos Int. 2009; 20 (5): 801-10.
41. Nawathe S, Akhlaghpour H, Bouxsein ML, Keaveny TM., Microstructural failure mechanisms in the human proximal femur for sideways fall loading. J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Jul 6 [Epub ahead of print].
42. Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, et al. An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2001; 12 (7): 519-28.
43. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, et al. The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2007; 18 (8): 1033-46.
44. Pluijm SM, Koes B, de Laet C, et al. A simple risk score for the assessment of absolute fracture risk in general practice based on two longitudinal studies. J Bone Miner Res. 2009; 24 (5): 768-74.
45. Keaveny TM, Kopperdahl DL, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Age-dependence of femoral strength in white women and men. J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25 (5): 994-1001.
46. Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P., Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159 (9): 882-90.
47. Keaveny TM., Biomechanical computed tomography-noninvasive bone strength analysis using clinical computed tomography scans. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2010; 1192: 57-65.
48. Mueller DK, Kutscherenko A, Bartel H, Vlassenbroek A, Ourednicek P, Erckenbrecht J., Phantom-less QCT BMD system as screening tool for osteoporosis without additional radiation. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79 (3): 375-81.
49. Pickhardt PJ, Lee LJ, del Rio AM, et al. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard. J Bone Miner Res. 2011; 26 (9): 2194-203.
50. Summers RM, Baecher N, Yao J, et al. Feasibility of simultaneous computed tomographic colonography and fully automated bone mineral densitometry in a single examination. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011; 35 (2): 212-6.
51. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169 (22): 2071-7.