Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1539-1545

  Khoo, B C C ^a   Brown, K ^b   Cann, C ^b   Zhu, K ^a,c   Henzell, S ^a   Low, V ^a   Gustafsson, S ^a   Price, R I ^a   Prince, R L ^a,c  

^a SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b Mindways Software   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Areal bone mineral density; Dual energy X ray absorptiometry; Femoral neck; Proximal femur; Quantitative computer tomography; T scores; Total hip

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; GREATER TROCHANTER; HIP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; OSTEOPOROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDITY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; OSTEOPOROSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 68949209983     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0820-y     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. JA Kanis CC Gluer 2000 An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation Osteoporosis Int 11 192 202
2. G Tucker A Metcalfe C Pearce, et al 2007 The importance of calculating absolute rather than relative fracture risk Bone 41 6 937 941
3. TF Lang JH Keyak MW Heitz, et al 1997 Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: precision and relation to bone strength Bone 21 101 108
4. PM Mayhew CD Thomas JG Clement, et al 2005 Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk Lancet 366 9480 129 135
5. RL Prince A Devine SS Dhaliwal, et al 2006 Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women Arch Intern Med 166 8 869 875
6. CE Cann HK Genant 1980 Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography J Comput Assist Tomogr 4 493 500
7. Khoo BCC (2006) Dosimetry assessment for QCT (hip and spine) and 3-D DXA (hip) for Human Rights Ethics Committee (HREC) submission. Internal Report of Department of Medical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands
8. AC Looker ES Orwoll CC Johnston Jr, et al 1997 Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older US adults from NHANES III J Bone Miner Res 12 1761 1768
9. S Henzell S Dhaliwal R Pontifex, et al 2000 Precision error of fan-beam dual X-ray absorptiometry scans at the spine, hip, and forearm J Clin Densitom 3 4 359 364
10. HK Genant S Grampp CC Gluer, et al 1994 Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results J Bone Miner Res 9 1503 1514
11. SL Hui S Gao XH Zhou, et al 1997 Universal standardization of bone density measurements: a method with optimal properties for calibration among several instruments J Bone Miner Res 12 1463 1470
12. JA Sheperd B Fan Y Lu, et al 2006 Comparison of BMD for prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans Osteoporosis Int 17 1303 1308
13. MM Goodsitt 1992 Conversion relations for quantitative CT bone mineral densities measured with solid and liquid calibration standards Bone and Mineral 19 145 158
14. MK Nurzenski NK Briffa RI Price, et al 2007 Geometric indices of bone strength are associated with physical activity and dietary calcium intake in healthy older women J Bone Miner Res. 22 3 416 424