Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 475-483

  Orwoll, Eric S ^a   Marshall, Lynn M ^a   Nielson, Carrie M ^a   Cummings, Steven R ^b   Lapidus, Jodi ^a   Cauley, Jane A ^c   Ensrud, Kristine ^d   Lane, Nancy ^e   Hoffmann, Paul R ^f   Kopperdahl, David L ^f   Keaveny, Tony M ^f,g  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f ON Diagnostics   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Bone strength; Fracture risk assessment; Osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE STRENGTH; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMMUNITY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; FEMUR FRACTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; HAZARD RATIO; HIP; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; INTROSPECTION; MALE; PREDICTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOM SAMPLE; RISK;

AGED; AGING; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 61849141278     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.081201     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Nicholson PH, Brys P, Nijs J, Dequeker J 1997 Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: Relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. Bone 20:213-218.
2. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger Ff, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ III, O'Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A 2005 Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185-1194.
3. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, de Laet CE, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA 2004 Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: The Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195-202.
4. Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE, Berger ML 2004 Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164:1108-1112.
5. Wainwright SA, Marshall LM, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Black DM, Hillier TA, Hochberg MC, Vogt MT, Orwoll ES for the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group 2005 Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:2787-2793.
6. Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Garnero P, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD 2005 Identification of osteopenic women at high risk of fracture: The OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res 20:1813-1819.
7. Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR for the Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group 2003 BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: Long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:1947-1954.
8. Hayes WC, Piazza SJ, Zysset PK 1991 Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 29:1-18.
9. Myers ER, Wilson SE 1997 Biomechanics of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture. Spine 22(Suppl):25S-31S.
10. Bouxsein ML 2001 Biomechanics of age-related fractures. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J (eds.) Osteoporosis vol. 1. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 509-531.
11. Duan Y, Duboeuf F, Munoz F, Delmas PD, Seeman E 2006 The fracture risk index and bone mineral density as predictors of vertebral structural failure. Osteoporos Int 17:54-60.
12. Duan Y, Seeman E, Turner CH 2001 The biomechanical basis of vertebral body fragility in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 16:2276-2283.
13. Yang RS, Lin HJ, Chieng PU, Liu TK, Tsai KS 2005 Estimated risk score for spine fracture in the specific bending activity of normal Taiwanese men and women. Spine 30:2288-2292.
14. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III, Robb RA, Camp JJ. Atkinson EJ, Oberg AL, Rouleau PA, McCollough CH, Khosla S, Bouxsein ML 2006 Population-based analysis of the relationship of whole bone strength indices and fall-related loads to age- and sex-specific patterns of hip and wrist fractures. J Bone Miner Res 21:315-323.
15. Bouxsein ML, Melton LJ III, Riggs BL, Muller J, Atkinson EJ, Oberg AL, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Rouleau PA, McCollough CH, Khosla S 2006 Age- and sex-specific differences in the factor of risk for vertebral fracture: A population-based study using OCT. J Bone Miner Res 21:1475-1482.
16. Melton LJ, III, Riggs BL, Keaveny TM, Achenbach SJ, Hoffmann PF, Camp JJ, Rouleau PA, Bouxsein ML, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Robb RA, Khosla S 2007 Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 22:1885-1892.
17. Bouxsein ML, Szulc P, Munoz F, Thrall E, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas PD 2007 Contribution of trochanteric soft tissues to fall force estimates, the factor of risk, and prediction of hip fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 22:825-831.
18. Cody DD, Gross GJ, Hou FJ, Spencer HJ, Goldstein SA, Fyhrie DP 1999 Femoral strength is better predicted by finite element models than QCT and DXA. J Biomech 32:1013-1020.
19. Keyak JH, Meagher JM, Skinner HB, Mote CD Jr 1990 Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: A new method. J Biomed Eng 12:389-397.
20. Keyak JH, Lee IY, Rossi SA, Skinner HB 1995 Prediction of femoral fracture load and location using CT scan-derived finite element models. Trans Orthop Res Soc 20:457.
21. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Skinner HB 1998 Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. J Biomech 31:125-133.
22. Lengsfeld M, Schmitt J, Alter P, Kaminsky J, Leppek R 1998 Comparison of geometry-based and CT voxel-based finite element modelling and experimental validation. Med Eng Phys 20:515-522.
23. Camacho DL, Hopper RH, Lin GM, Myers BS 1997 An improved method for finite element mesh generation of geometrically complex structures with application to the skullbase. J Biomech 30:1067-1070.
24. Bozic KJ, Keyak JH, Skinner HB, Bueff HU, Bradford DS 1994 Three-dimensional finite element modeling of a cervical vertebra: An investigation of burst fracture mechanism. J Spinal Disord 7:102-110.
25. Faulkner KG, Cann CE, Hasegawa BH 1991 Effect of bone distribution on vertebral strength: Assessment with patient- specific nonlinear finite element analysis. Radiology 179:669-674.
26. Homminga J, Weinans H, Gowin W, Felsenberg D, Huiskes R 2001 Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution. Spine 26:1555-1561.
27. Martin H, Werner J, Andresen R, Schober HC, Schmitz KP 1998 Noninvasive assessment of stiffness and failure load of human vertebrae from CT-data. Biomedizinische Technik 43:82-88.
28. Keyak JH 2001 Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. Med Eng Phys 23:165-173.
29. Crawford RP, Cann CE, Keaveny TM 2003 Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography. Bone 33:744-750.
30. Imai K, Ohnishi I, Bessho M, Nakamura K 2006 Nonlinear finite element model predicts vertebral bone strength and fracture site. Spine 31:1789-1794.
31. Buckley JM, Loo K, Motherway J 2007 Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength. Bone 40:767-774.
32. Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E, Cauley J, Cummings S, Ensrud K, Lewis C, Cawthon PM, Marcus R, Marshall LM, McGowan J, Phipps K, Sherman S, Stefanick ML, Stone K 2005 Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study: A large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials 26:569-585.
33. Blank JB, Cawthon PM, Carrion-Petersen ML, Harper L, Johnson JP, Mitson E, Delay RR 2005 Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). Contemp Clin Trials 26:557-568.
34. Marshall LM, Lang TF, Lambert LC, Zmuda JM, Ensrud KE, Orwoll ES for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Research Group 2006 Dimensions and volumetric BMD of the proximal femur and their relation to age among older U.S. men. J Bone Miner Res 21:1197-1206.
35. Lang TF, Keyak JH, Heitz MW, Augat P, Lu Y, Mathur A, Genant HK 1997 Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: Precision and relation to bone strength. Bone 21:101-108.
36. Morgan EF, Keaveny TM 2001 Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. J Biomech 34:569-577.
37. Morgan EF, Bayraktar HH, Keaveny TM 2003 Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. J Biomech 36:897-904.
38. Bayraktar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Morris GE, Wong EK, Keaveny TM 2004 Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech 37:27-35.
39. Keaveny TM, Morgan EF, Niebur GL, Yeh OC 2001 Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 3:307-333.
40. Reilly DT, Burstein AH 1975 The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 8:393-405.
41. Lubliner J 1990 Plasticity Theory. Macmillan, New York, NY, USA.
42. Un K, Bevill G, Keaveny TM 2006 The effects of side-artifacts on the elastic modulus of trabecular bone. J Biomech 39:1955-1963.
43. Bevill G, Easley SK, Keaveny TM 2007 Side-artifact errors in yield strength and elastic modulus for human trabecular bone and their dependence on bone volume fraction and anatomic site. J Biomech 40:3381-3388.
44. Keyak JH 2000 Relationships between femoral fracture loads for two load configurations. J Biomech 33:499-502.
45. Keyak JH, Rossi SA, Jones KA, Les CM, Skinner HB 2001 Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models. Med Eng Phys 23:657-664.
46. Pinilla TP, Boardman KC, Bouxsein ML, Myers ER, Hayes WC 1996 Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss. Calcif Tissue Int 58:231-235.
47. Courtney AC, Wachtel EF, Myers ER, Hayes WC 1995 Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:387-395.
48. Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Maitland LA, Resnick NM, Hayes WC 1994 severity and bone mineral density as risk factor for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly. JAMA 271:128-133.
49. Greenspan SL, Myers ER, Kiel DP, Parker RA, Hayes WC, Resnick NM 1998 direction, bone mineral density, and function: Risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly. Am J Med 104:539-545.
50. van den Kroonenberg AJ, Hayes WC, McMahon TA 1995 Dynamic models for sideways falls from standing height. J Biomech Eng 117:309-318.
51. Robinovitch SN, McMahon TA, Hayes WC 1995 Force attenuation in trochanteric soft tissues during impact from a fall. J Orthop Res 13:956-962.
52. Courtney AC, Wachtel EF, Myers ER, Hayes WC 1994 Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur. Calcif Tissue Int 55:53-58.
53. Barlow WE, Ichikawa L, Rosner D, Izumi S 1999 Analysis of case-cohort designs. J Clin Epidemiol 52:1165-1172.
54. Salgado-Ugarte I, Shimizu M, Taniuchi T 1994 Exploring the shape of univariate data using Kernel density estimators. ST ATA Tech Bull 16:8-19.
55. Dodd LE, Pepe MS, 2003 Partial AUC estimation and regression. Biometrics 59:614-623.
56. Pepe MS, Longton G, Anderson GL, Schummer M 2003 Selecting differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments. Biometrics 59:133-142.
57. Black DM, Bouxsein ML, Marshall LM, Cummings SR, Lang TF, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Nielson CM, Orwoll ES, for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group 2008 Proximal femoral structure and the prediction of hip fracture in men: A large prospective study using QCT. J Bone Miner Res 23:1326-1333.
58. Bousson V, Le Bras A, Roqueplan F, Kang Y, Mitton D, Kolta S, Bergot C, Skalli W, Vicaut E, Kalender W, Engelke K, Laredo JD 2006 Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: Relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone. Osteoporos Int 17:855-864.
59. Meta M, Lu Y, Keyak JH, Lang T 2006 Young-elderly differences in bone density, geometry and strength indices depend on proximal femur sub-region: A cross sectional study in Caucasian-American women. Bone 39:152-158.
60. Cheng X, Li J, Lu Y, Keyak J, Lang T 2007 Proximal femoral density and geometry measurements by quantitative computed tomography: Association with hip fracture. Bone 40:169-174.
61. Keyak JH, Kaneko TS, Rossi SA, Pejcic MR, Tehranzadeh J, Skinner HB 2005 Predicting the strength of femoral shafts with and without metastatic lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:161-170.
62. Yang RS, Liu TK, Hang YS, Chieng PU, Tsai KS 1999 Factor of risk for hip fracture in normal Chinese men and women in Taiwan. Calcif Tissue Int 65:422-426.
63. Riggs BL, Melton lii LJ III, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Atkinson EJ, Peterson JM, Rouleau PA, McCollough CH, Bouxsein ML, Khosla S 2004 Population-based study of age and sex differences in bone volumetric density, size, geometry, and structure at different skeletal sites. J Bone Miner Res 19:1945-1954.