College chemistry students' use of memorized algorithms in chemical reactions

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 81-93

  Nyachwaya, James M ^a   Warfa, Abdi Rizak M ^b   Roehrig, Gillian H ^c   Schneider, Jamie L ^d  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c 320 Learning and Environmental Sciences   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN RIVER FALLS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893399596     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c3rp00114h     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adadan E., Trundle K. C. and Irving K. E., (2010), Exploring grade 11 students' conceptual pathways of the particulate nature of matter in the context of multirepresentational instruction, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 47 (8), 1004-1035
2. Beall H. and Prescott S., (1994), Concepts and Calculations in Chemistry Teaching and Learning, J. Chem. Educ., 71, 111-112
3. Bennett S. W., (2008), Problem solving: can anybody do it? Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 60-64
4. Ben-Zvi R., Eylon B. and Silberstein J., (1987), Students' visualization of a chemical reaction, Educ. Chem., 24, 117-120
5. Bergquist, W. and Heikkinen, H. (1990), Student ideas regarding chemical equilibrium: What written test answers do not reveal, J. Chem. Educ., 67, 1000-1003
6. Bodner G. M., (1991), I have found you an argument: the conceptual knowledge of beginning Chemistry Graduate Students, J. Chem. Educ., 68, 653-655
7. Bodner G. M., (2003), Problem solving: the difference between what we do and what we tell students to do, Univ. Chem. Educ., 7, 37-45
8. Bunce D. M. and Gabel D. L., (2002), Differential effects on the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 39 (10), 911-927
9. Cartrette P. D. and Bodner G. M., (2010), Non-mathematical problem solving in organic chemistry. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 47 (6), 643-660
10. Charmaz K., (2000), Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods, in Denzin N. K. and Lincoln Y. S. (ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 509-535
11. Chei M. H., (2001), Algorithmic problem solving and conceptual understanding of chemistry by students at a local high school in Taiwan. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc., Repub. China, Part D, 11, 20-38
12. Coll R. K. and Treagust D. F., (2003), Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners' mental models of ionic bonding, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40, 464-486
13. Creswell J., (2007), Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among 5 approaches, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
14. Cros D., Chastrette M. and Fayol M., (1987), Conceptions of second year university students of some fundamental notions of chemistry, Int. J. Sci. Ed., 10, 331-336
15. Dahsah C. and Coll R. K., (2007), Thai grade 10 and 11 students' conceptual understanding and ability to solve stoichiometry problems, Res. Sci. Tech. Educ., 25 (2), 227-241
16. Davidowitz B., Chittleborough C. and Murray E., (2010), Student-generated submicro diagrams: a useful tool for teaching and learning chemical equations and stoichiometry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11, 154-164
17. Dori Y. J. and Hameiri M., (2003), Multidimensional analysis system for quantitative chemistry problems-symbol, macro, micro and process aspects, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40 (3), 278-302
18. Gabel D. L., (1986). Problem solving in chemistry. In research matters - To the science teacher. NARST Occasional Publication, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED266957
19. Gabel D. L., (2003), Enhancing conceptual understanding of Science, Educ. Horizons, 81, 70-76
20. Gabel D. L. and Bunce D. M., (1994), Research on problem solving: Chemistry. in Gabel D. L. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, New York, Macmillan, pp. 310-326
21. Gotwals A. W. and Songer N. B., (2013), Using assessments to gather validity evidence for a learning progression on evidence-based explanations with core ecological content, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40 (5), 597-626
22. Grove N. P. and Bretz S. L., (2012), A Continuum of Learning: From Rote Memorization to Meaningful Learning in Organic Chemistry, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13, 201-208
23. Hammer D., (1989), Two approaches to learning physics. Phys. Teach., 27 (12), 664-670
24. Hammer D., (1994), Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics, Cog. Inst., 12 (2), 151-183
25. Heeren J. K., (1990), Teaching chemistry by the Socratic Method, J. Chem. Educ., 67 (4), 330-331
26. Johnstone A. H., (1991), Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem, J. Comp. Ass. Learn., 7, 75-83
27. Kelly R. M., Barrera J. H. and Mohamed S. C., (2010), An analysis of undergraduate general chemistry students' misconceptions of the submicroscopic level of precipitation reactions, J. Chem. Educ., 87 (1), 113-118
28. Kern A. L., Wood N. B., Roehrig G. H. and Nyachwaya J. M., (2010), Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11, 165-172
29. Mulford D. R. and Robinson W. R., (2002), An inventory for alternative conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students, J. Chem. Educ., 79, 739-744
30. Naah B. M. and Sanger M. J., (2012), Student misconceptions in writing balanced equations for dissolving ionic compounds in water, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 13, 186-194
31. Nakhleh M., (1992), Why some students don't learn chemistry, J. Chem. Educ., 69, 191-196
32. Nakhleh M. B., (1993), Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? J. Chem. Educ., 70, 52-55
33. Nakhleh M. B. and Mitchell R. C., (1993), Concept learning versus problem-solving: there is a difference, J. Chem. Educ., 70, 190-192
34. Nieswandt M., (2007), Student effect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 44, 908-937
35. Novak J. D., (2002), Meaningful learning: the essential factor for conceptual change in limited or appropriate propositional hierarchies (liphs) leading to empowerment of learners, Sci. Educ., 86 (4), 548-571
36. Nyachwaya J. M., Mohamed A-R., Roehrig G. H., Wood N. B., Kern A. L. and Schneider J. L., (2011), Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 12, 121-132
37. Papaphotis G. and Tsaparlis G., (2008), Conceptual versus algorithmic learning in high school chemistry: the case of basic quantum chemical concepts, Part 2. Students' common errors, misconceptions and difficulties in understanding, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 332-340
38. Pappa E. T. and Tsaparlis G., (2011), Evaluation of questions in general chemistry textbooks according to the form of the questions and the Question-Answer Relationship (QUA): the case of intra-and intermolecular chemical bonding, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 12, 262-270
39. Paris S. G., Cross D. R. and Lipson M. Y., (1984), Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension, J. Ed. Psych., 76, 1239-1252
40. Price J. F. and McNeill K. L., (2013), Toward a lived science curriculum in intersecting figured worlds: an exploration of individual meanings in science education, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 50 (5), 501-529
41. Pushkin D. B., (1998), Introductory Students, Conceptual Understanding, and Algorithmic Success, J. Chem. Educ., 75 (7), 809-810
42. Robinson W. R., (2003), Chemistry problem-solving: symbol, macro, micro, and process aspects, J. Chem. Educ., 80, 978-982
43. Rubin H. and Rubin I., (2005), Qualitative interviewing the art of hearing data, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
44. Sanger M. J., (2005), Evaluating students' conceptual understanding of balanced equations and stoichiometric ratios using a particulate drawing, J. Chem. Educ., 82, 131-134
45. Sawrey B. A., (1990), Concept learning vs. problem solving: Revisited, J. Chem. Educ., 67, 253-264
46. Smith K. J. and Metz P. A., (1996), Evaluating student understanding of solution chemistry through microscopic representations, J. Chem. Educ., 73, 233-235
47. Stains M. and Talanquer V., (2008), Classification of chemical substances using particulate representations of matter: An analysis of student thinking, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 29, 643-661
48. Stefani C. and Tsaparlis G., (2009), Students' levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: a phenomenographic study, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 46, 520-536
49. Taasoobshirazi G. and Glyn S. M., (2009), College students solving chemistry problems: a theoretical model of expertise, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 46 (10), 1070-1089
50. Taber K., (2002), Chemical misconceptions-prevention, diagnosis and cure: vol. 1: theoretical background, London: Royal Society of Chemistry
51. Taber K. S. and Adbo K., (2013), Developing chemical understanding in the explanatory vacuum: Swedish high school students' use of an anthropomorphic conceptual framework to make sense of chemical phenomena, in Tsaparlis G. and Sevian H., (ed.) Concepts of Matter in Science Education., Springer, pp. 347-370
52. Taber K. S. and Watts M., (1996), The secret life of the chemical bond: students' anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 18 (5), 557-568
53. Talanquer V., (2007), Explanations and teleology in chemistry education. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 29 (7), 853-870
54. Teichert M. A. and Stacy A. M., (2002). Promoting understanding of chemical bonding and spontaneity through student explanation and integration of ideas, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 39, 464-496
55. Treagust D. F., Chittleborough G. and Mamiala T. L., (2003), The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 25 (11), 1353-1368
56. Tsaparlis G., (2005), Non-algorithmic quantitative problem solving in university physical chemistry: a correlation study of the role of selective cognitive factors, Res. Sci. Tech. Educ., 23, 125-148
57. Tsaparlis G. and Zoller U., (2003), Evaluation of higher- versus lower-order cognitive skills-type examinations in chemistry: implications for university in-class assessment and examinations, Univ. Chem. Educ., 7, 50-57
58. Van Driel J. H., Verloop N. and de Vos W., (1998), Developing science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 35 (6), 673-695
59. Weissglass J., (1993), Small-Group Learning, Am. Math. Mon., 100 (7), 662-668
60. Wood C. and Breyfogle B., (2006), Interactive Demonstrations for Mole Ratios and Limiting Reagents, J. Chem. Educ., 83 (5), 741
61. Yarroch W. L. (1985), Student understanding of chemical equation balancing, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 22, 449-459
62. Zoller U., (1993), Lecture and learning: are they compatible? Maybe for LCOS; unlikely for HOCS, J. Chem. Educ., 70 (3), 195-197
63. Zoller U., (2000), Teaching tomorrow's college science courses-are we getting it right? J. Col. Sci. Teach., 29, 409-414
64. Zoller U. (2002), Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (chemistry) exam questions: performance and attitudes of college students, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 24 (2), 185-203
65. Zoller U., Lubezky A., Nakhleh M. B., Tessier B. and Dori J., (1995), Success on algorithmic and LOCS vs. conceptual chemistry exam questions, J. Chem. Educ., 72, 987-989