Problem solving: Can anybody do it?

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 60-64

  Bennett, Stuart W ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

'algorithm type' problems; Bloom's taxonomy; Chemistry problem solving; Gender differences; Practical work; Types of problem solving

Indexed keywords

EID: 41549127504     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b801298a     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Bennett S.W., (2004), Assessment and the role of examinations, U. Chem. Educ., 8, 52-57.
2. Bennett S.W., (2006), Fuzzy problems: student performance, educational background, approaches to solutions, Biennial Conference on Chemical Education, Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 196.
3. Bennett S.W. and O'Neale K., (1998), Skills development and practical work in chemistry, U. Chem. Educ., 1, 58-62.
4. Bloom B.S., Englehart M.D., Furst E.J., Hill W.H. and Krathwohl D.R., (1956),Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals: Handbook 1; The cognitive domain. New York, Longman.
5. Johnstone A.H., (1993), in Creative problem solving in chemistry, (eds C. Wood and R. Sleet), London, Royal Society of Chemistry.
6. Kirschner P. and Meester M.A.M., (1988), The laboratory in higher science education: problems, premises and objectives, Higher Educ.,17, 81-98.
7. The Guardian, (1997, 3 December), London.