Students' levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: A phenomenographic study

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 520-536

  Stefani, Christina ^a   Tsaparlis, Georgios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOANNINA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTION; ATOMIC ORBITAL; CHEMICAL BONDINGS; CHEMISTRY CONCEPTS; CHEMISTRY STUDENTS; DETERMINISTIC MODELS; DINGER EQUATION; KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION; METHOD OF ANALYSIS; PHENOMENOGRAPHY; SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

ATOMS; CHEMICAL BONDS; MOLECULAR ORBITALS; QUANTUM THEORY;

STUDENTS;

EID: 67049157936     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20279     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. åkerlind, G. S. (2002). Principle and practice in phenomenographic research. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Current Issues in Phenomenography. Camperra, Australia. http://www.anu.edu.au/CEDAM/ilearn/ symposium/Akerlind%202%20.doc (accessed December 22, 2007).
2. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology-A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
3. Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
4. Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology-A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
5. Birkoff, G., and von Newmann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics, 37, 835-843.
6. Bodner, G. M. (1991). I have found you an argument-The conceptual knowledge of beginning chemistry graduate students. Journal of Chemical Education, 68, 385-388.
7. Bodner, G. M. (2004). Twenty years of learning: How to do research in chemical education. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 618-628.
8. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
9. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner and J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in a cross-cultural psychology (pp. 137-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Castro, E. A., and Fernandez, FM. (1987). Intellectual development beyond formal operations. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 441-447.
11. Coll, R. K., and Taylor, N. (2002). Mental models in chemistry: Senior chemistry students mental models of chemical bonding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 175-184.
12. Coll, R. K., and Treagust, D. F (2001). Learners' mental models of chemical bonding. Research in Science Education, 31, 357-382.
13. DiSessa, A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Formn and PB. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
14. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., and Scott, P. (1996). Young people's image of science. Buckingham: Oxford University Press.
15. Driver, R., Newton, P., and Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
16. Ebenezer, J. V., and Fraser, D. M. (2001). First year chemical engineering students' conceptions of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction. Science Education, 85, 509-523.
17. Fishler, H., and Lichtfeldt, M. (1992). Modern physics and students' conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 181-190.
18. Franco, C, Lins de Barros, H., Colinvaux, D., Krapas, S., Queiroz, G., and Alves, F (1999). From scientists' and inventors' minds to some scientific and technological products: Relationship between theories, models, mental models, and conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 277-291.
19. Gabel, D. (1998). The complexity of chemistry and implications for teaching. In B. J. Fraser and K. G Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 265-295). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
20. Gilbert, J. K., and Boulter, C. J. (1998). Learning science through models and modeling. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53-66). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic.
21. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., and Elmer, R. (2000). Positioning models in science education and in design and technology education. In J. K. Gilbert and C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 3-18). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
22. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., and Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations. Part 2. Whose voice? whose ears? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 187-203.
23. Grosslight, L., Unger, C, Jay, E., and Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 799-822.
24. Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science and Education, 16, 653-697.
25. Harrison, A. G., and Treagust, D. F. (1996). Secondary student's mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching chemistry. Science Education, 80, 509-534.
26. Harrison, A. G., and Treagust, D. F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple-model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352-381.
27. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Justi, R. S., and Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers' views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1369-1386.
29. Kalkanis, G., Hadzidaki, P., and Stavrou, D. (2003). An instructional model for a radical conceptual change towards quantum mechanics concepts. Science Education, 87, 257-280.
30. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Liu, X. (2001). Synthesizing research on student conceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 55-81.
32. Lybeck, L., Marton, F., Stomdahl, H., and Tullberg, A. (1988). The phenomenography of ''the mole concept'' in chemistry. In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning-New perspectives (pp. 81-108). London: Kegan Paul.
33. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
34. Marton, F., and Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Matthews, M. R. (2007). Models in science and in science education. Science and Education, 16, 647-652.
36. Mortimer, E. F., and Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
37. Nakiboglu, C. (2003). Instructional misconceptions of Turkish prospective chemistry teachers about atomic orbitals and hybridization. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4, 171-188.
38. Nersessian, N. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39. Nicoll, G. (2001a). A report of undergraduates' bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 707-730.
40. Nicoll, G (2001b). A three-tier system for assessing concept map links: A methodological study. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 863-875.
41. Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86, 548-571.
42. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., and McGillycuddy, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
43. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. California: Sage Publications.
44. Petri, J., and Niedderer, H. (1998). A learning pathway in high-school level quantum atomic physics. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1075-1088.
45. Renstrom, L., Andersson, B., and Marton, F. (1990). Students' conceptions of matter. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 555-569.
46. Rop, C. J. (1999). Student perspectives on success in high school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 221-237.
47. Rye, J. A., and Rubba, PA. (1997). An exploration of the concept map as an interview tool to facilitate the extranalization of students' understandings about global atmospheric change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 521-546.
48. Sanchez Gómez, P. J., and Martín, F. (2003). Quantum versus 'classical' chemistry in university chemistry education: A case study of the role of history in thinking the curriculum. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 4, 131-148.
49. Schmidt, H.-J., and Völke, D. (2003). Shift of meaning and students' alternative concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1409-1424.
50. Scott, PH., Mortimer, E. F., and Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605-631.
51. Shiland, T. W. (1997). Quantum mechanics and conceptual change in high school chemistry texts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 535-545.
52. Stamovlasis, D., Tsaparlis, G., Kamilatos, C., Papaoikonomou, D., and Zarotiadou, E. (2004). Conceptual understanding versus algorithmic problem solving: A principal component analysis of a national examination. The Chemical Educator, 9, 398-405.
53. Stefani, C., and Tsipis, C. A. (2002). Alternative conceptions and difficulties of students regarding the quantum mechanical model of the atom. 6th World Congress of Theoretically Oriented Chemists, Book of Abstracts, No. PA157. Lugano, Switzerland: The World Association of Theoretical and Computational Chemists.
54. Taber, K. S. (2002a). Conceptualizing quanta-Illuminating the ground stateofstudent understanding of atomic orbitals. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 145-158.
55. Taber, K. S. (2002b). Compounding quanta-Probing the frontiers of student understanding of molecular orbitals. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 159-173.
56. Taber, K. S., & Watts, M. (2000). Learners' explanations for chemical phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1, 329-353.
57. Tsangaris, J. M., Tsangaris, G. M., and Perlepes, S. P. (1987). Fundamental principles of atomic and molecular structure (in Greek). Ioannina, Greece: Self-Publication.
58. Tsaparlis, G. (1993). Elementary physical chemistry (in Greek). Ioannina, Greece: University of Ioannina.
59. Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Atomic orbitals, molecular orbitals and related concepts: Misconceptions and difficulties in understanding among chemistry students. Research in Science Education, 27, 271-287.
60. Tsaparlis, G., and Papaphotis, G. (2002). Quantum-chemical concepts: Are they suitable for secondary students? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3, 129-144.
61. Tsaparlis, G., and Papaphotis, G. (2008). High-school students' conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 1-36.
62. Van Driel, J. H., and Verlop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1141-1153.
63. Vosniadou, S., and Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
64. Vosniadou, S., Ioannidis, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., and Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 381-419.