From genome to phenome and back in tomato

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 9-15

  Ichihashi, Yasunori ^a,b   Sinha, Neelima R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Elements Chemistry Laboratory   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENOME; TOMATO;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME, PLANT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84893388738     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.12.004     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Hochuli P.A., Feist-Burkhardt S. Angiosperm-like pollen and Afropollis from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of the Germanic Basin (Northern Switzerland). Front Plant Sci 2013, 4:344.
2. Long Q., Rabanal F.A., Meng D., Huber C.D., Farlow A., Platzer A., Zhang Q., Vilhjalmsson B.J., Korte A., Nizhynska V., et al. Massive genomic variation and strong selection in Arabidopsis thaliana lines from Sweden. Nat Genet 2013, 45:884-890.
3. Weigel D. Natural variation in Arabidopsis: from molecular genetics to ecological genomics. Plant Physiol 2012, 158:2-22.
4. Cao J., Schneeberger K., Ossowski S., Gunther T., Bender S., Fitz J., Koenig D., Lanz C., Stegle O., Lippert C., et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat Genet 2011, 43:956-963.
5. Doebley J.F., Gaut B.S., Smith B.D. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 2006, 127:1309-1321.
6. Izawa T., Konishi S., Shomura A., Yano M. DNA changes tell us about rice domestication. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2009, 12:185-192.
7. Ranjan A., Ichihashi Y., Sinha N.R. The tomato genome: implications for plant breeding, genomics and evolution. Genome Biol 2012, 13:167.
8. Hamilton J.P., Buell C.R. Advances in plant genome sequencing. Plant J 2012, 70:177-190.
9. Paterson A.H., Freeling M., Tang H., Wang X. Insights from the comparison of plant genome sequences. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2010, 61:349-372.
10. Moyle L.C. Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum sect Lycopersicon). Evolution 2008, 62:2995-3013.
11. Holtan H.E., Hake S. Quantitative trait locus analysis of leaf dissection in tomato using Lycopersicon pennellii segmental introgression lines. Genetics 2003, 165:1541-1550.
12. Labate J.A., Robertson L.D. Evidence of cryptic introgression in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) based on wild tomato species alleles. BMC Plant Biol 2012, 12:133.
13. Kimura S., Koenig D., Kang J., Yoong F.Y., Sinha N. Natural variation in leaf morphology results from mutation of a novel KNOX gene. Curr Biol 2008, 18:672-677.
14. Monforte A.J., Tanksley S.D. Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a L. esculentum genetic background: a tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome 2000, 43:803-813.
15. Alseekh S., Ofner I., Pleban T., Tripodi P., Di Dato F., Cammareri M., Mohammad A., Grandillo S., Fernie A.R., Zamir D. Resolution by recombination: breaking up Solanum pennellii introgressions. Trends Plant Sci 2013, 18:536-538.
16. The Tomato Genome Consortium The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 2012, 485:635-641.
17. Bombarely A., Rosli H.G., Vrebalov J., Moffett P., Mueller L.A., Martin G.B. A draft genome sequence of Nicotiana benthamiana to enhance molecular plant-microbe biology research. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2012, 25:1523-1530.
18. Xu X., Pan S., Cheng S., Zhang B., Mu D., Ni P., Zhang G., Yang S., Li R., Wang J., et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature 2011, 475:189-195.
19. Sierro N., Battey J.N., Ouadi S., Bovet L., Goepfert S., Bakaher N., Peitsch M.C., Ivanov N.V. Reference genomes and transcriptomes of Nicotiana sylvestris and Nicotiana tomentosiformis. Genome Biol 2013, 14:R60.
20. Koenig D., Jimenez-Gomez J.M., Kimura S., Fulop D., Chitwood D.H., Headland L.R., Kumar R., Covington M.F., Devisetty U.K., Tat A.V., et al. Comparative transcriptomics reveals patterns of selection in domesticated and wild tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013, 110:E2655-E2662.
21. Toubiana D., Semel Y., Tohge T., Beleggia R., Cattivelli L., Rosental L., Nikoloski Z., Zamir D., Fernie A.R., Fait A. Metabolic profiling of a mapping population exposes new insights in the regulation of seed metabolism and seed, fruit, and plant relations. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002612.
22. Sim S.C., Durstewitz G., Plieske J., Wieseke R., Ganal M.W., Van Deynze A., Hamilton J.P., Buell C.R., Causse M., Wijeratne S., et al. Development of a large SNP genotyping array and generation of high-density genetic maps in tomato. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e40563.
23. Minoia S., Petrozza A., D'Onofrio O., Piron F., Mosca G., Sozio G., Cellini F., Bendahmane A., Carriero F. A new mutant genetic resource for tomato crop improvement by TILLING technology. BMC Res Notes 2010, 3:69.
24. Okabe Y., Asamizu E., Saito T., Matsukura C., Ariizumi T., Bres C., Rothan C., Mizoguchi T., Ezura H. Tomato TILLING technology: development of a reverse genetics tool for the efficient isolation of mutants from Micro-Tom mutant libraries. Plant Cell Physiol 2011, 52:1994-2005.
25. Blanca J., Canizares J., Cordero L., Pascual L., Diez M.J., Nuez F. Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e48198.
26. The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
27. Jaillon O., Aury J.M., Noel B., Policriti A., Clepet C., Casagrande A., Choisne N., Aubourg S., Vitulo N., Jubin C., et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007, 449:463-467.
28. Klee H.J., Giovannoni J.J. Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annu Rev Genet 2011, 45:41-59.
29. Alba R., Cordonnier-Pratt M.M., Pratt L.H. Fruit-localized phytochromes regulate lycopene accumulation independently of ethylene production in tomato. Plant Physiol 2000, 123:363-370.
30. Giorio G., Stigliani A.L., D'Ambrosio C. Phytoene synthase genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)-new data on the structures, the deduced amino acid sequences and the expression patterns. FEBS J 2008, 275:527-535.
31. Pnueli L., Carmel-Goren L., Hareven D., Gutfinger T., Alvarez J., Ganal M., Zamir D., Lifschitz E. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 1998, 125:1979-1989.
32. Lifschitz E., Eviatar T., Rozman A., Shalit A., Goldshmidt A., Amsellem Z., Alvarez J.P., Eshed Y. The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:6398-6403.
33. Lippman Z.B., Semel Y., Zamir D. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2007, 17:545-552.
34. Rick C.M., Yoder J.I. Classical and molecular genetics of tomato: highlights and perspectives. Annu Rev Genet 1988, 22:281-300.
35. Zamir D. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat Rev Genet 2001, 2:983-989.
36. Seymour D.K., Filiault D.L., Henry I.M., Monson-Miller J., Ravi M., Pang A., Comai L., Chan S.W., Maloof J.N. Rapid creation of Arabidopsis doubled haploid lines for quantitative trait locus mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:4227-4232.
37. Chitwood D.H., Kumar R., Headland L.R., Ranjan A., Covington M.F., Ichihashi Y., Fulop D., Jimenez-Gomez J.M., Peng J., Maloof J.N., et al. A quantitative genetic basis for leaf morphology in a set of precisely defined tomato introgression lines. Plant Cell 2013, 25:2465-2481.
38. Kumar R., Ichihashi Y., Kimura S., Chitwood D.H., Headland L.R., Peng J., Maloof J.N., Sinha N.R. A high-throughput method for Illumina RNA-Seq library preparation. Front Plant Sci 2012, 3:202.
39. Chitwood D.H., Headland L.R., Filiault D.L., Kumar R., Jimenez-Gomez J.M., Schrager A.V., Park D.S., Peng J., Sinha N.R., Maloof J.N. Native environment modulates leaf size and response to simulated foliar shade across wild tomato species. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e29570.
40. Bengough A.G., McKenzie B.M., Hallett P.D., Valentine T.A. Root elongation, water stress, and mechanical impedance: a review of limiting stresses and beneficial root tip traits. J Exp Bot 2011, 62:59-68.
41. Ron M., Dorrity M.W., de Lucas M., Toal T., Hernandez R.I., Little S.A., Maloof J.N., Kliebenstein D.J., Brady S.M. Identification of novel loci regulating interspecific variation in root morphology and cellular development in tomato. Plant Physiol 2013, 162:755-768.
42. Tanksley S.D. The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 2004, 16(Suppl):S181-S189.
43. Frary A., Nesbitt T.C., Grandillo S., Knaap E., Cong B., Liu J., Meller J., Elber R., Alpert K.B., Tanksley S.D. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 2000, 289:85-88.
44. Cong B., Liu J., Tanksley S.D. Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:13606-13611.
45. Cong B., Barrero L.S., Tanksley S.D. Regulatory change in YABBY-like transcription factor led to evolution of extreme fruit size during tomato domestication. Nat Genet 2008, 40:800-804.
46. Zamir D. Where have all the crop phenotypes gone?. PLoS Biol 2013, 11:e1001595.
47. Chitwood D.H., Sinha N.R. A census of cells in time: quantitative genetics meets developmental biology. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2012, 16:92-99.
48. Schauer N., Semel Y., Roessner U., Gur A., Balbo I., Carrari F., Pleban T., Perez-Melis A., Bruedigam C., Kopka J., et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:447-454.
49. Schauer N., Semel Y., Balbo I., Steinfath M., Repsilber D., Selbig J., Pleban T., Zamir D., Fernie A.R. Mode of inheritance of primary metabolic traits in tomato. Plant Cell 2008, 20:509-523.
50. Steinhauser M.C., Steinhauser D., Gibon Y., Bolger M., Arrivault S., Usadel B., Zamir D., Fernie A.R., Stitt M. Identification of enzyme activity quantitative trait loci in a Solanum lycopersicum×Solanum pennellii introgression line population. Plant Physiol 2011, 157:998-1014.
51. Juenger T.E. Natural variation and genetic constraints on drought tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2013, 16:274-281.
52. Wang Z., Gerstein M., Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:57-63.
53. Carroll S.B. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 2008, 134:25-36.
54. Chitwood D.H., Maloof J.N., Sinha N.R. Dynamic transcriptomic profiles between tomato and a wild relative reflect distinct developmental architectures. Plant Physiol 2013, 162:537-552.
55. Park S.J., Jiang K., Schatz M.C., Lippman Z.B. Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:639-644.
56. Kohonen T. Self-organizing maps 1997, Springer, New York.
57. Wehrens R., Buydens L.M.C. Self- and super-organizing maps in R: the Kohonen package. J Statist Softw 2007, 21:1-19.
58. Efroni I., Blum E., Goldshmidt A., Eshed Y. A protracted and dynamic maturation schedule underlies Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell 2008, 20:2293-2306.
59. Peter I.S., Davidson E.H. Evolution of gene regulatory networks controlling body plan development. Cell 2011, 144:970-985.
60. Fischer A.H., Smith J. Evo-devo in the era of gene regulatory networks. Integr Comp Biol 2012.
61. Rodriguez F., Wu F., Ane C., Tanksley S., Spooner D.M. Do potatoes and tomatoes have a single evolutionary history, and what proportion of the genome supports this history?. BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9:191.
62. Nuez F., Prohens J., Blanca J.M. Relationships, origin, and diversity of Galapagos tomatoes: implications for the conservation of natural populations. Am J Bot 2004, 91:86-99.
63. Zhang X., Zhao H., Gao S., Wang W.C., Katiyar-Agarwal S., Huang H.D., Raikhel N., Jin H. Arabidopsis Argonaute 2 regulates innate immunity via miRNA393(*)-mediated silencing of a Golgi-localized SNARE gene, MEMB12. Mol Cell 2011, 42:356-366.
64. Ori N., Eshed Y., Paran I., Presting G., Aviv D., Tanksley S., Zamir D., Fluhr R. The I2C family from the wilt disease resistance locus I2 belongs to the nucleotide binding, leucine-rich repeat superfamily of plant resistance genes. Plant Cell 1997, 9:521-532.
65. Larsen P.B., Cancel J., Rounds M., Ochoa V. Arabidopsis ALS1 encodes a root tip and stele localized half type ABC transporter required for root growth in an aluminum toxic environment. Planta 2007, 225:1447-1450.
66. 2+ uptake have distinct and overlapping roles in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2010, 152:1284-1290.
67. Zhong S., Fei Z., Chen Y.R., Zheng Y., Huang M., Vrebalov J., McQuinn R., Gapper N., Liu B., Xiang J., et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat Biotechnol 2013, 31:154-159.
68. Birney E., Stamatoyannopoulos J.A., Dutta A., Guigo R., Gingeras T.R., Margulies E.H., Weng Z., Snyder M., Dermitzakis E.T., Thurman R.E., et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 2007, 447:799-816.
69. Gerstein M.B., Lu Z.J., Van Nostrand E.L., Cheng C., Arshinoff B.I., Liu T., Yip K.Y., Robilotto R., Rechtsteiner A., Ikegami K., et al. Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science 2010, 330:1775-1780.
70. Roy S., Ernst J., Kharchenko P.V., Kheradpour P., Negre N., Eaton M.L., Landolin J.M., Bristow C.A., Ma L., Lin M.F., et al. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 2010, 330:1787-1790.