Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis of Leaf Dissection in Tomato Using Lycopersicon pennellii Segmental Introgression Lines

Genetics

Volumn 165, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 1541-1550

  Holtan, Hans E E ^a,b   Hake, Sarah ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PLANT GENE EXPRESSION CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INTROGRESSION; LEAF DEVELOPMENT; LEAF DISSECTION; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEGMENTAL INTROGRESSION LINE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOMATO;

GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION TEST; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EMBRYOPHYTA; LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PENNELLII; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 0345803933     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. AVASARALA, S., J. YANG and J. L. CARUSO, 1996 Production of phenocopies of the lanceolate mutant in tomato using polar auxin transport inhibitors. J. Exp. Bot 47: 709-712.
2. AVIVI, Y., S. LEV-YADUN, N. MOROZOVA, L. LIBS, L. WILLIAMS et al., 2000 Clausa, a tomato mutant with a wide range of phenotypic perturbations, displays a cell type-dependent expression of the homeobox gene LeT6/TKn2. Plant Physiol. 124: 541-552.
3. BHARATHAN, G., T. E. GOLIBER, C. MOORE, S. KESSLER, T. PHAM et al., 2002 Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOXI gene expression during development. Science 296: 1858-1860.
4. CHEN, J.J., B.J. JANSSEN, A. WILLIAMS, and N. SINHA, 1997 A gene fusion at a homeobox locus: alterations in leaf shape and implications for morphological evolution. Plant Cell 9: 1289-1304.
5. DENGLER, N., 1984 Comparison of leaf development in normal (+/+), entire (e/e), and Lanceolate (La/+) plants of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum 'Ailsa Craig'. Bot. Gaz. 145: 66-77.
6. DEVICENTE, M. C., and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1993 QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596.
7. 2 populations. Genetics 134: 559-570.
8. DOEBLEY, J., A. STEC and L. HUBBARD, 1997 The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485-488.
9. ESHED, Y., and D. ZAMIR, 1994 A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii L. esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79: 175-179.
10. ESHED, Y., and D. ZAMIR, 1995 An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141: 1147-1162.
11. FRARY, A., T. C. NESBITT, S. GRANDILLO, E. KNAAP, B. CONG et al., 2000 fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.
12. GOLIBER, T., S. KESSLER, J. J. CHEN, G. BHARATHAN and N. SINHA, 1999 Genetic, molecular, and morphological analysis of compound leaf development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 43: 250-200.
13. HAREVEN, D., T. GUTFINGER, A. PARNIS, Y. ESHED and E. LIFSCHITZ, 1996 The making of a compound leaf genetic manipulation of leaf architecture in tomato. Cell 84: 735-744.
14. HAY, A., H. KAUR, A. PHILLIPS, P. HEDDEN, S. HAKE et al., 2002 The gibberellin pathway mediates KNOTTED 1-type homeobox function in plants with different body plans. Curr. Biol. 12: 1557.
15. JANSSEN, B. J., A. WILLIAMS, J. J. CHEN, J. MATHERN, S. HAKE et al., 1998 Isolation and characterization of two knotted-like homeobox genes from tomato. Plant Mol. Biol. 36: 417-425.
16. JIANG, C., R. WRIGHT, S. WOO, T. DELMONTE and A. H. PATERSON, 2000 QTL analysis of leaf morphology in tetraploid Gossypium (cotton). Theor. Appl. Genet. 100: 409-418.
17. KESSLER, S., M. KIM, T. PHAM, N. WEBER and N. SINHA, 2001 Mutations altering leaf morphology in tomato. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162: 475-492.
18. KOLTAI, H., and D. M. BIRD, 2000 Epistatic repression of PHANTASTICA and class 1 KNOTTED genes is uncoupled in tomato. Plant J. 22: 455-459.
19. PATERSON, A. H., J. W. DEVERNA, B. LANINI and S. D. TANKSLEY, 1990 Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. Genetics 124: 735-742.
20. PATERSON, A. H., S. DAMON, J. D. HEWITT, D. ZAMIR, H. D. RABINOWITCH et al., 1991 Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics 127: 181-197.
21. PEREZ-PEREZ, J. M., J. SERRANO-CARTAGENA and J. L. MICOL, 2002 Genetic analysis of natural variations in the architecture of Arabidopsis thaliana vegetative leaves. Genetics 162: 893-915.
22. QILIN, P., L. YONG-SHENG, O. BUDAI-HADRIAN, M. SELA, L. CARMEL-GOREN et al., 2000 Comparative genetics of NBS-LRR resistance gene homologues in the genomes of two dicotyledons: tomato and Arabidopsis. Genetics 155: 309-322.
23. RICK, C. M., and A. L. HARRISON, 1959 Inheritance of five new tomato seedling characters. J. Hered. 50: 91-98.
24. SEKHAR, C. K., and V. SAWHNEY, 1990 Leaf development in the normal and solanifolia mutant of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Am. J. Bot. 77: 46-53.
25. SEKHAR, K. N. C., and V.Y SAWHNEY, 1991 Regulation of leaf shape in the solanifolia mutant of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum by plant growth substances. Ann. Bot. 67: 3-6.
26. TANKSLEY, S. D., H. MEDINA-FILHO and C. M. RICK, 1982 Use of naturally occurring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato Lycopersicon esculentum. Heredity 49: 11-26.
27. TSIANTIS, M., and A. HAY, 2003 Comparative plant development: The time of the leaf? Nat. Rev. Genet. 4: 169-180.
28. WESTERBERGH, A., and J. DOEBEY, 2002 Morphological traits defining species differences in wild relatives of maize are controlled by multiple quantitative trait loci. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 56: 273-283.