A census of cells in time: Quantitative genetics meets developmental biology

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 92-99

  Chitwood, Daniel H ^a   Sinha, Neelima R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REVIEW;

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PHENOTYPE; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84873733108     PISSN: 13695266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.11.003     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Jansen R.C., Nap J.P. Genetical genomics: the added value from segregation. Trends Genet 2001, 17:388-391.
2. Keurentjes J.J., Fu J., Terpstra I.R., Garcia J.M., van den Ackerveken G., Snoek L.B., Peeters A.J., Vreugdenhil D., Koornneef M., Jansen R.C. Regulatory network construction in Arabidopsis by using genome-wide gene expression quantitative loci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:1708-1713.
3. Keurentjes J.J., Fu J., de Vos C.H., Lommen A., Hall R.D., Bino R.J., van der Plas L.H., Jansen R.C., Vreugdenhil D., Koornneef M. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nat Genet 2006, 38:842-849.
4. Johanness F., Colot V., Jansen R.C. Epigenome dynamics: a quantitative genetics perspective. Nat Rev Genet 2008, 9:883-890.
5. Fu J., Keurentjes J.J., Bouwmeester H., America T., Verstappen F.W., Ward J.L., Beale M.H., de Vos R.C., Dijkstra M., Scheltema R.A., et al. System-wide molecular evidence for phenotypic buffering in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 2009, 41:166-167.
6. Prins P., Smant G., Jansen R.C. Genetical genomics for evolutionary studies. Methods Mol Biol 2012, 856:469-485.
7. Becraft P.W., Bongard-Pierce D.K., Sylvester A.W., Poethig R.S., Freeling M. The liguleless-1 gene acts tissue specifically in maize leaf development. Dev Biol 1990, 141:220-232.
8. Sylvester A.W., Cande W.Z., Freeling M. Division and differentiation during normal and liguleless-1 maize leaf development. Development 1990, 110:985-1000.
9. Tian F., Bradbury P.J., Brown P.J., Hung H., Sun Q., Flint-Garcia S., Rocheford T.R., McMullen M.D., Holland J.B., Buckler E.S. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet 2011, 43:159-162.
10. Sinha N.R., Williams R.E., Hake S. Overexpression of the maize homeo box gene, KNOTTED-1, causes a switch from determinate to indeterminate cell fates. Genes Dev 1993, 7:787-795.
11. Janssen B.J., Lund L., Sinha N. Overexpression of a homeobox gene, LeT6, reveals indeterminate features in the tomato compound leaf. Plant Physiol 1998, 117:771-786.
12. Kimura S., Koenig D., Kang J., Yoong F.Y., Sinha N. Natural variation in leaf morphology results from mutation of a novel KNOX gene. Curr Biol 2008, 18:672-677.
13. Piazza P., Bailey C.D., Cartolano M., Krieger J., Cao J., Ossowski S., Schneeberger K., He F., de Meaux J., Hall N., et al. Arabidopsis thaliana leaf form evolved via loss of KNOX expression in leaves in association with a selective sweep. Curr Biol 2010, 20:2223-2228.
14. Kliebenstein D.J., West M.A., van Leeuwen H., Kim K., Doerge R.W., Michelmore R.W., St Clair D.A. Genomic survey of gene expression diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2006, 172:1179-1189.
15. West M.A., Kim K., Kliebenstein D.J., van Leeuwen H., Michelmore R.W., Doerge R.W., St Clair D.A. Global eQTL mapping reveals the complex genetic architecture of transcript-level variation in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2007, 175:1441-1450.
16. Kirst M., Basten C.J., Myburg A.A., Zeng Z.B., Sederoff R.R. Genetic architecture of transcript-level variation in differentiating xylem of a eucalyptus hybrid. Genetics 2005, 169:2295-2303.
17. deCook R., Lall S., Nettleton D., Howell S.H. Genetic regulation of gene expression during shoot development in Arabidopsis. Genetics 2006, 172:1155-1164.
18. Potokina E., Druka A., Luo Z., Wise R., Waugh R., Kearsey M. Gene expression quantitative trait locus analysis of 16000 barley genes reveals a complex pattern of genome-wide transcriptional regulation. Plant J 2008, 53:90-101.
19. Potokina E., Druka A., Luo Z., Moscou M., Wise R., Waugh R., Kearsey M. Tissue-dependent limited pleiotropy affects gene expression in barley. Plant J 2008, 56:287-296.
20. Drost D.R., Benedict C.I., Berg A., Novaes E., Novaes C.R., Yu Q., Dervinis C., Maia J.M., Yap J., Miles B., Kirst M. Diversification in the genetic architecture of gene expression and transcriptional networks in organ differentiation of Populus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:8492-8497.
21. Jiao Y., Tausta S.L., Gandotra N., Sun N., Liu T., Clay N.K., Ceserani T., Chen M., Ma L., Holford M., et al. A transcriptome atlas of rice cell types uncovers cellular, functional and developmental hierarchies. Nat Genet 2009, 41:258-263.
22. Nogueira F.T., Chitwood D.H., Madi S., Ohtsu K., Schnable P.S., Scanlon M.J., Timmermans M.C. Regulation of small RNA accumulation in the maize shoot apex. PLoS Genet 2009, 5:e1000320.
23. Matas A.J., Yeats T.H., Buda G.J., Zheng Y., Chatterjee S., Tohge T., Ponnala L., Adato A., Aharoni A., Stark R., et al. Tissue- and cell-type specific transcriptome profiling of expanding tomato fruit provides insights into metabolic and regulatory specialization and cuticle formation. Plant Cell 2011, 23:3893-3910.
24. Takacs E.M., Li J., Du C., Ponnala L., Janick-Buckner D., Yu J., Muehlbauer G.J., Schnable P.S., Timmermans M.C., Sun Q., et al. Ontogeny of the maize shoot apical meristem. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3219-3234.
25. Brady S.M., Orlando D.A., Lee J.Y., Wang J.Y., Koch J., Dinneny J.R., Mace D., Ohler U., Benfey P.N. A high-resolution root spatiotemporal map reveals dominant expression patterns. Science 2007, 318:801-806.
26. Yadav R.K., Girke T., Pasala S., Xie M., Reddy G.V. Gene expression map of the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem stem cell niche. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:4941-4946.
27. Dinneny J.R., Long T.A., Wang J.Y., Jung J.W., Mace D., Pointer S., Barron C., Brady S.M., Schiefelbein J., Benfey P.N. Cell identity mediates the response of Arabidopsis roots to abiotic stress. Science 2008, 320:942-945.
28. Deal R.B., Henikoff S. A simple method for gene expression and chromatin profiling of individual cell types within a tissue. Dev Cell 2010, 18:1030-1040.
29. Deal R.B., Henikoff S. The INTACT method for cell type-specific gene expression and chromatin profiling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Protoc 2011, 6:56-68.
30. Vaughn M.W., Tanurdzic M., Lippman Z., Jiang H., Carrasquillo R., Rabinowicz P.D., Dedhia N., McCombie W.R., Agier N., Bulski A., et al. Epigenetic natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol 2007, 5:e174.
31. Zhang X., Shiu S.H., Cal A., Borevitz J.O. Global analysis of genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional polymorphisms in Arabidopsis thaliana using whole genome tiling arrays. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e1000032.
32. Tessadori F., van Zanten M., Pavlova P., Clifton R., Pontvianne F., Snoek L.B., Millenaar F.F., Schulkes R.K., van Driel R., Voesenek L.A., et al. Phytochrome B and histone deacetylase 6 control light-induced chromatin compaction in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 2009, 5:e1000638.
33. Alonso-Blanco C., Aarts M.G., Bentsink L., Keurentjes J.J., Reymond M., Vreugdenhil D., Koornneef M. What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation?. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1877-1896.
34. Atwell S., Huang Y.S., Vilhjalmsson B.J., Willems G., Horton M., Li Y., Meng D., Platt A., Tarone A.M., Hu T.T., et al. Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines. Nature 2010, 465:627-631.
35. Beemster G.T., De Vusser K., De Tavernier E., De Bock K., Inze D. Variation in growth rate between Arabidopsis ecotypes is correlated with cell division and A-type cyclin-dependent kinase activity. Plant Physiol 2002, 129:854-864.
36. Efroni I., Blum E., Goldshmidt A., Eshed Y. A protracted and dynamic maturation schedule underlies Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell 2008, 20:2293-2306.
37. Moreno-Risueno M.A., Van Norman J.M., Moreno A., Zhang J., Ahnert S.E., Benfey P.N. Oscillating gene expression determines competence for periodic Arabidopsis root branching. Science 2010, 329:1306-1311.
38. Park S.J., Jiang K., Schatz M.C., Lippman Z.B. Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:639-644.
39. Eveland A.L., Satoh-Nagasawa N., Goldshmidt A., Meyer S., Beatty M., Sakai H., Ware D., Jackson D. Digital gene expression signatures for maize development. Plant Physiol 2010, 154:1024-1039.
40. Chitwood D.H., Headland L.R., Filiault D.L., Kumar R., Jimenez-Gomez J.M., Schrager A.V., Park D.S., Peng J., Sinha N.R., Maloof J.N. Native environment modulates leaf size and response to simulated foliar shade across wild tomato species. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e29570.
41. Chitwood D.H., Headland L.R., Kumar R., Peng J., Maloof J.N., Sinha N.R. The developmental trajectory of leaflet morphology in wild tomato species. Plant Physiol 2012, 158:1230-1240.
42. Brown P.J., Upadyayula N., Mahone G.S., Tian F., Bradbury P.J., Myles S., Holland J.B., Flint-Garcia S., McMullen M.D., Buckler E.S., Rocheford T.R. Distinct genetic architectures for male and female inflorescence traits of maize. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1002383.
43. Toubiana D., Semel Y., Tohge T., Beleggia R., Cattivelli L., Rosental L., Nikoloski Z., Zamir D., Fernie A.R., Fait A. Metabolic profiling of a mapping population exposes new insights in the regulation of seed metabolism and seed, fruit, and plant relations. PLoS Genet 2012, 8:e1002612.
44. Schauer N., Semel Y., Roessner U., Gur A., Balbo I., Carrari F., Pleban T., Perez-Melis A., Bruedigam C., Kopka J., et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:447-454.
45. Kim M., Canio W., Kessler S., Sinha N. Developmental changes due to long-distance movement of a homeobox fusion transcript in tomato. Science 2001, 293:287-289.
46. Molnar A., Melnyk C.W., Bassett A., Hardcastle T.J., Dunn R., Baulcombe D.C. Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 2010, 328:872-875.
47. Chitwood D.H., Nogueira F.T., Howell M.D., Montgomery T.A., Carrington J.C., Timmermans M.C. Pattern formation via small RNA mobility. Genes Dev 2009, 23:549-554.
48. Carlsbecker A., Lee J.Y., Roberts C.J., Dettmer J., Lehesranta S., Zhou J., Lindgren O., Moreno-Risueno M.A., Vaten A., Thitamadee S., et al. Cell signaling by microRNA 165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. Nature 2010, 465:316-321.
49. Gur A., Semel Y., Osorio S., Friemann M., Seekh S., Ghareeb B., Mohammad A., Pleban T., Gera G., Fernie A.R., Zamir D. Yield quantitative trait loci from wild tomato are predominately expressed by the shoot. Theor Appl Genet 2011, 122:405-420.
50. Langlade N.B., Feng X., Dransfield T., Copsey L., Hanna A.I., Thebaud C., Bangham A., Hudson A., Coen E. Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:10221-10226.
51. Chitwood D.H., Headland L.R., Ranjan A., Martinez C.C., Braybrook S.A., Koenig D.P., Kuhlemeier C., Smith R.S., Sinha N.R. Leaf asymmetry as a developmental constraint imposed by auxin-dependent phyllotactic patterning. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2318-2327.
52. Chitwood D.H., Naylor D.T., Thammapichai P., Weeger A.C., Headland L.R., Sinha N.R. Conflict between intrinsic leaf asymmetry and phyllotaxis in the resupinate leaves of Alstroemeria psittacina. Front Plant Sci 2012, 3:182.
53. Feng X., Wilson Y., Bower J., Kennaway R., Bangham A., Hannah A., Coen E., Hudson A. Evolution of allometry in Antirrhinum. Plant Cell 2009, 21:2999-3007.
54. Cui M.L., Copsey L., Green A.A., Bangham J.A., Coen E. Quantitative control of organ shape by combinatorial gene activity. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000538.
55. Green A.A., Kennaway J.R., Hanna A.I., Bangham J.A., Coen E. Genetic control of organ shape and tissue polarity. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000537.
56. Kuchen E.E., Fox S., de Reuille P.B., Kennaway R., Bensmihen S., Avondo J., Calder G.M., Southam P., Robinson S., Bangham A., Coen E. Generation of leaf shape through early patterns of growth and tissue polarity. Science 2012, 335:1092-1096.
57. Reinhardt D., Pesce E.R., Stieger P., Mandel T., Baltensperger K., Bennett M., Traas J., Friml J., Kuhlemeier C. Regulation of phyllotaxis by polar auxin transport. Nature 2003, 426:255-260.
58. Smith R.S., Guyomarc'h S., Mandel T., Reinhardt D., Kuhlemeier C., Prusinkiewicz P. A plausible model of phyllotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:1301-1306.
59. Hamant O., Heisler M.G., Jonsson H., Krupinski P., Uyttewaal M., Bokov P., Corson F., Sahlin P., Boudaoud A., Meyerowitz E.M., Couder Y., Traas J. Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science 2008, 322:1650-1655.
60. Heisler M.G., Hamant O., Krupinski P., Uyttewaal M., Ohno C., Jonsson H., et al. Alignment between PIN1 polarity and microtubule orientation in the shoot apical meristem reveals a tight coupling between morphogenesis and auxin transport. PLoS Biol 2010, 19:e1000516.
61. Peaucelle A., Braybrook S.A., Le Guillou L., Bron E., Kuhlemeier C., Hofte H. Pectin-induced changes in cell wall mechanics underlie organ initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 2011, 21:1720-1726.
62. Kierzkowski D., Nakayama N., Routier-Kierzkowska A.L., Weber A., Bayer E., Schorderet M., Reinhardt D., Kuhlemeier C., Smith R.S. Elastic domains regulate growth and organogenesis in the plant shoot apical meristem. Science 2012, 335:1096-1099.
63. Mouille G., Witucka-Wall H., Bruyant M.P., Loudet O., Pelletier S., Rihouey C., Lerouxel O., Lerouge P., Hofte H., Pauly M. Quantitative trait loci analysis of primary cell wall composition in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2006, 141:1035-1044.
64. Reddy G.V., Meyerowitz E.M. Stem-cell homeostasis and growth dynamics can be uncoupled in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Science 2005, 310:663-667.
65. Roeder A.H., Chickarmane V., Cunha A., Obara B., Manjunath B.S., Meyerowitz E.M. Variability in the control of cell division underlies sepal epidermal patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000367.
66. Massonnet C., Tisne S., Radziejwoski A., Vile D., De Veylder L., Dauzat M., Granier C. New insights into the control of endoreduplication: endoreduplication could be driven by organ growth in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol 2011, 157:2044-2055.
67. Sterken R., Kiekens R., Boruc J., Zhang F., Vercauteren A., Vercauteren I., De Smet L., Dhondt S., Inze D., De Veylder L., et al. Combined linkage and association mapping reveals CYCD5;1 as a quantitative trait gene for endoreduplication in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012, 109:4678-4683.