Task preparation and task inhibition: A comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010)

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 211-216

  Grange, James A ^a   Houghton, George ^b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Backward inhibition; Preparation; Reaction time distribution analysis; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REVERSAL LEARNING;

EID: 79951857466     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-010-0023-3     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 357- 376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2009). Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task-switching. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2069-2080.
3. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2010a). Cue-switch costs in task switching: Cue priming or control processes? Psychological Research, 74, 481-490.
4. Grange, J. A., & Houghton, G. (2010b). Heightened conflict in cuetarget translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1003-1009.
5. Houghton, G., Pritchard, R., & Grange, J. A. (2009). The role of cuetarget translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 466-476.
6. Karayanidis, F., Jamadar, S., Ruge, H., Phillips, N., Heathcote, A., & Forstmann, B.U. (2010). Advance preparation in task-switching: Converging evidence from behavioral, brain activation and model-based approaches. Frontiers in Cognition, 1 ̧ article 25 [doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00025]
7. Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010). The role of inhibition in task switching - a review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 1-14.
8. Lien, M.-C., Ruthruff, E., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (2005). On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: Do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 299-315.
9. Meiran, N., & Chorev, Z. (2005). Phasic alertness and the resid ual task- switching cost. Experimental Psychology, 52, 109-124.
10. Schneider, D. W., & Verbruggen, F. (2008). Inhibition of irrelevant category- response mappings. The Quarterly Journal of Exper-imental Psychology, 61, 1629-1640.