Curriculum making in the new curriculum reform: Structure, process and meaning

Curriculum Reform in China: Changes and Challenges

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 31-46

  Deng, Zongyi ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892981160     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Clandinin, D. J., and Connelly, F. M. (1992). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research in curriculum (pp. 402-435). New York: Macmillan.
2. Cohen, D. K., and Ball, B. L. (1990a). Policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 233-239.
3. Cohen, D. K., and Ball, B. L. (1990b). Policy and practice: A commentary. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 331-338.
4. Cohen, D. K., and Spillane, J. P. (1992). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and instruction. Review of research in education, 18, 3-49.
5. Cohen. D. K., and Barnes, C. A. (1993). Conclusion: A new pedagogy for policy? In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, and J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 240-275). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Cohen, D. K., and Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7. Connelly, F. M., and Clandinin, D. J. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Connelly, F. M., and Connelly, G. (2009). The syllabus: Policy instrument and practical curriculum guide. In A. Luke, K. Weir, A. Woods and M. Moroney (Eds.), Development of a set of principles to guide a P-12 syllabus framework: A report to the Queensland Studies Authority (pp. 128-139). Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
9. Connelly, F. M., and Xu, S. (2011). Curriculum and curriculum studies. In J. Arthur and A. Peterson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to education. New York: Routledge. (Forthcoming).
10. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and " quality education" in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 241-249.
12. Deng, Z. (2010). Scientific literacy: Content and curriculum making. In C. Linder, L. Östman, Roberts, D. A., P.-O., Wickman, G. Erickson, and A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscapes of scientific literacy (pp. 45-56). New York: Routledge.
13. Doyle, W. (1992a). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486-516). New York: Macmillan.
14. Doyle, W. (1992b). Constructing curriculum in the classroom. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick and J. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new syntheses (pp. 66-79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
15. Feng, D. (2006). China's recent curriculum reform: Progress and problems. Planning and Changing, 37 (1/2), 131-144.
16. Fullan, M. G., and Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
17. Goertz, M. E., Floden, R. E. and O'Day, J. (1996). Studies of education reform: Systemic reform, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Goodlad, J. I., and associates (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Guan, Q., and Meng, W. (2007) China's new national curriculum reform: Innovation, challenges and strategies. Frontiers of Education in China, 2 (4), 579-604.
20. Halpin, D. (2010). National curriculum reform in China and England: Origins, character and comparison. Frontiers of Education in China, 5(2), 258-269.
21. Huang, F. (2004). Curriculum reform in contemporary China: seven goals and six strategies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36 (1), 101-115.
22. Jackson, P. W. (2002). Conceptions of curriculum and curriculum specialists. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 3-40). New York: Macmillan.
23. Liu, P., and Qi, C. (2005). Reform in the curriculum of basic education in the People's Republic of China: Pedagogy, application, and learners. International Journal of Educational Reform, 14 (1), 35-44.
24. Mok, K. H. (2007). Questing for internationalization of universities in Asia: Critical reflections. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11 (3/4), 433-454.
25. McLaughlin, M. W., and Talbert, J. E. (1993). Introduction: New vision of teaching. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin and J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 1-10). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Ministry of Education. (1999). Decision to further educational systemic reform and promote quality oriented education (guanyu shenhua jiaoyu tizhi gaige quanmian tuijin suzhi jiaoyu de jueding). Beijing: Ministry of Education.
27. Ministry of Education (2001). Programme on the reform of the basic education curriculum (Experimental) (jichu jiaoyu kecheng gaige gangyao [Shixing]). Beijing: Ministry of Education.
28. Reid, W. A. (2006). The pursuit of curriculum: schooling and the public interest. Greenwich, CT: Information Publishing.
29. Rosenmund, M. (2000). Approaches to international comparative research on curricula and curriculum-making processes. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(5), 599-606.
30. Rosenmund, M. (2007). The current discourse on curriculum change: A comparative analysis of national reports on education. In A. Benavot and C. Braslavsky (Eds.), School knowledge in comparative and historical Perspective: Changing curricula in primary and secondary education. (pp. 173-194). CERC Studies in Comparative Education, No 19. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
31. Talbert, J. E., and McLaughlin, M. W. (1993). Understanding teaching in context. In D. Cohen, M. McLaughlin, and J. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (pp. 167-206). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Watkins, D. A., and Biggs, J. B. (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspective. Hong Kong; Melbourne: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong; Australian Council for Educational Research.
34. Westbury, I. (2000). Teaching as a reflective practice: What might didaktik teach curriculum. In I. Westbury, S. Hopmann and K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition (pp. 15-39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Westbury, I. (2008). The making of formal curricula: Why do states make curricula, and how? In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He and J. Phillion (Eds.), Sage handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 45-65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Westbury, I. (2010). Introduction. Unpublished manuscript.
37. Xu, Y. (2009). School-based teacher development through a school-university collaborative project: A case study of a recent initiative in China. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(1), 49-66.
38. Jiang, S. D., and Lu, H. W. (2005) Constructivism and new ideas of classroom teaching. Journal of Chongqing College of Education, 18(2), 70-73. (in Chinese).
39. Zhang, J. (2005). New basic education reform is not a Copernican revolution. Contemporary Educational Science, (13), 14-16. (in Chinese).
40. Zhao, Y. (2007). China and the whole child. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 70-73.
41. Zhong, Q. (2006). Curriculum reform in China. Frontiers of Education in China, 1(3), 370-382.
42. Zhu, M. (2007). Recent Chinese experiences in curriculum reform. Prospects, 37(2), 223-235.