Leveraging crowdsourced peer-to-peer assessments to enhance the case method of learning

Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-15

  Avery, Jill ^a  

^a HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Case method; Class participation; Crowdsourcing; Peer to peer assessment; Student to student interaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892966828     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15375137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. AACSB. (2012). Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation. In.
2. Aggarwal, P., & O'Brien, C. L. (2008). Social Loafing on Group Projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 255-264.
3. Arter, J., & Spandel, V. (1992). NCME Instructional Module: Using Portfolios of a Student's Work in Instruction and Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11, 36-44.
4. Aylesworth, A. (2008). Improving Case Discussion with an Improv Mindset. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 106-115.
5. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The Instructional Effects of Feedback in Test-Like Events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
6. Barnes, L. B., Christensen, C. R., & Hansen, A. J. (1994). Teaching and the Case Method. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The Self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 680-740). New York: McGraw Hill, Oxford University Press.
8. Bloxham, S., & West, A. (2004). Understanding the Rules of the Game: Making Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students' Conceptions of Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 721-733.
9. Bonoma, T. V., & Kosnik, T. J. (1989). Learning by the Case Method in Marketing: Harvard Business School Publishing, No. 9-590-008.
10. Bonomo, T., & Koznik, T. (1989). Learning by the Case Method in Marketing. In Harvard Business School Publishing. Boston, MA.
11. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 79-89.
12. Burchfield, C. M., & Sappington, J. (1999). Participation in Classroom Discussion. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 290-291.
13. Christensen, C. R. (1989). Teaching and the Case Method. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Chylinski, M. (2010). Participation Money as a Mechanism for Measurement, Reward, and Formative Feedback in Active Class Participation. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 25-38.
15. Clow, K., & Wachter, M. (1996). Teaching Methodologies Used in Basic Marketing: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Marketing Education, 18, 48-59.
16. Corey, R. E. (1996). The Uses of Cases in Management Education. Harvard Business School Publishing, 9-376-240.
17. Crespy, C., Rosenthal, D., & Stearns, J. (1999). Change and Growth: Advances in the Use of Cases in Marketing. Marketing Education Review, 9, 1-3.
18. Desiraju, R., & Gopinath, C. (2001). Encouraging Participation in Case Discussions: A Comparison of the MICA and the Harvard Case Methods. Journal of Management Education, 25, 394-408.
19. Duverger, P., & Steffes, E. M. (2012). The Reliability of Crowdsource Grading in a Creative Marketing Project Context. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 20, 39-49.
20. Ellett, W. (2007). The Case Study Handbook. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21. Falchikov, N. (1986). Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146-166.
22. Falchikov, N. (1995). Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment. Innovation in Education and Training, 32, 175-187.
23. Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (Fourth Edition ed., Vol. II, pp. 357-411). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
24. Gibson, B., & Sachau, D. (2000). Sandbagging as a Self-Presentational Strategy: Claiming to Be Less Than You Are. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 56-70.
25. Gonzalez, G. R., Ingram, T. N., LaForge, R. W., & Leigh, T. W. (2004). Social Capital: Building an Effective Learning Environment in Marketing Classes. Marketing Education Review, 14, 1-8.
26. Gopinath, C. (1999). Alternatives to Instructor Assessment of Class Participation. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 10-14.
27. Gordon, K. H. (1924). Group Judgments in the Field of Lifted Weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 398-400.
28. Graeff, T. R. (1998). Writing Behavior Learning Objectives for Marketing Courses: Meeting the Challenges of AACSB Outcomes Assessment. Marketing Education Review, 8, 13-25.
29. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The Totalitarian Ego: Fabrication and Revision of Personal History. American Psychologist, 35.
30. Hendry, E. (2009). Duke Professor Uses 'Crowdsourcing' to Grade. In The Chronicle of Higher Education.
31. Hounsell, D. (2003). Student Feedback, Learning and Development. In M. Slowey & D. Watson (Eds.), Higher Education and the Lifecourse (pp. 67-78). Berkshire, UK: SRHE & Open University Press.
32. Li, C., & Bernoff, J. (2007). Groundswell: Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies Harvard Business Review Press.
33. Mauboussin, M. J. (2007). Explaining the Wisdom of Crowds. In Mauboussin on Strategy: Legg Mason Capital Management.
34. Melvin, K. (1988). Rating Class Participation: The Prof/Peer Method. Teaching in Psychology, 15, 137-139.
35. Orsmond, P., & Merry, S. (1996). The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21, 239-249.
36. Page, S. E. (2007). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37. Peterson, R. M. (2001). Course Participation: An Active Learning Approach Employing Student Documentation. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 187-194.
38. Poddar, A. (2010). Continuous Additive Peer Review: A New System to Control Social Loafing in Group Projects. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 17, 1-12.
39. Pond, K., Uihaq, R., & Wade, W. (1995). Peer Review: A Precursor to Peer Assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 32, 314-323.
40. Qualman, E. (2009). Socialnomics: How Social Media Transforms the Way We Live and Do Business. New York: Wiley.
41. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education (2nd Edition ed.). London: Routledge
42. Rangan, V. K. (1995). Choreographing a Case Class. In Havard Business School Note. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
43. Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 147-164.
44. Ryan, G. J., Marshall, L. L., Porter, K., & Jia, H. (2007). Peer, Professor and Self-Evaluation of Class Participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8, 49-61.
45. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (1993). Peer Evaluation in Self-Managing Work Groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450-462.
46. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The Impact of Self-and Peer-Grading on Student Learning. Educational Assessment, 11, 1-31.
47. Shepperd, J. A., & Socherman, R. E. (1997). On the Manipulative Behavior of Low Machiavellians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1448-1459.
48. Stires, L. K., & Jones, E. E. (1969). Modesty Versus Self-Enhancement as Alternative Forms of Ingratiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 172-188.
49. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds. New York, NY: Doubleday.
50. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflicts. In W. G. A. a. S. Worchel (Ed.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
51. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and Well-Being: A Social Psychological Perspective on Mental Health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
52. Topping, K. (1998). Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
53. Treynor, J. L. (1987). Market Efficiency and the Bean Jar Experiment. Financial Analysts Journal, 50-53.
54. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of Success and Failure Revisited, or: The Motivational Bias is Alive and Well in Attribution Theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245-287.