Alternatives to Instructor Assessment of Class Participation

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 10-14

  Gopinath, C ^a  

^a SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142272436     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832329909598983     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alexander, L. D., O'Neill, H. M., Snyder, N. H., and Townsend, J. B., 1986. How academy members teach the business policy/strategic management case course. Journal of Management Case Studies, 2: 334–344.
2. Bonwell, C. C., and Eison, J. E., 1991. Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom, Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1
3. Boud, D., 1989. The role of self-assessment in student grading. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 14: 20–30.
4. Boud, D. J., 1986. Implementing student self-assessment, Sydney: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia.
5. Burke, R. J., 1969. Some preliminary data on the use of self-evaluations and peer ratings in assigning university course grades. The Journal of Educational Research, 62: 444–448.
6. Cohen, P., 1973. The Gospel according to the Harvard Business School, New York: Penguin.
7. Cole, N. C., and Gunz, H. P., Grading class participation: Listening for one hand clapping?. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management. San Diego, CA. August.
8. Edwards, R., 1989. An experiment in student self-assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 20: 5–10.
9. Falchikov, N., and Boud, D., 1989. Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59: 395–430.
10. Ferris, W. P., and Hess, P. W., 1985. Peer evaluation of student interaction in organizational behavior and other courses. The Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9: 74–82.
11. Gilson, C., 1994. Of dinosaurs and sacred cows: The grading of classroom participation. Journal of Management Education, 18: 227–236.
12. Heron, J., 1988. “ Assessment revisited ”. In Developing student autonomy in learning, Edited by: Boud, D., 77–90. London: Kogan Page.
13. Hollander, E. P., 1957. The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41: 85–90.
14. Humphreys, P., Greenan, K., and McIlveen, H., 1997. Developing work-based transferable skills in a university environment. Journal of European Industrial Training, 21: 63–70.
15. Love, K. G., 1981. Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66: 451–457.
16. Lynch, D. H., and Golden, S., 1992. Peer evaluation of writing in business communication classes. Journal of Education for Business, 68: 44–48.
17. Marcoulides, G. A., and Simkin, M. G., 1991. Evaluating student papers: The case for peer review. Journal of Education for Business, 67: 80–83.
18. Persons, O. S., 1998. Factors influencing students' peer evaluation in cooperative learning. Journal of Education for Business, 73: 225–229.
19. Sherrard, W. R., Raafat, F., and Weaver, R. R., 1994. An empirical study of peer bias in evaluations: Students rating students. Journal of Education for Business, 70: 43–47.
20. Smith, W. J., 1994. Comment on ‘Of dinosaurs and sacred cows: The grading of classroom participation.’. Journal of Management Education, 18: 237–240.