Dissociating body representations in healthy individuals: Differential effects of a kinaesthetic illusion on perception and action

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2430-2436

  Kammers, M P M ^a   van der Ham, I J M ^a   Dijkerman, H C ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Action; Body image; Body schema; Perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BICEPS BRACHII MUSCLE; BODY IMAGE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELBOW; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNEE; LEG MOVEMENT; LIMB MOVEMENT; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; PERCEPTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIBRATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TENDONS; VIBRATION;

EID: 33745955825     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aglioti S., DeSouza J.F., and Goodale M.A. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology 5 6 (1995) 679-685
2. Burrack, A., & Brugger, P. (in press). Individual differences in susceptibility to experimentally induced phantom sensations. Body Image.
3. Buxbaum L.J., and Coslett H.B. Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: Evidence from autotopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 18 4 (2001) 289-306
4. Cordo P.J., Gurfinkel V.S., Brumagne S., and Flores-Vieira C. Effect of slow, small movement on the vibration-evoked kinesthetic illusion. Experimental Brain Research (2005) 1-11
5. Dassonville P., and Bala J.K. Perception, action, and roelofs effect: A mere illusion of dissociation. PLoS Biology 2 11 (2004) e364
6. Declaration of Helsinki. World Medical Association, 1964.
7. de Vignemont F. Review of "How the body shapes the mind" by Shaun Gallagher. Psyche (2005)
8. de Vignemont F., Ehrsson H.H., and Haggard P. Bodily illusions modulate tactile perception. Current Biology 15 14 (2005) 1286-1290
9. Eklund G. Position sense and state of contraction; the effects of vibration. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 35 (1972) 606-611
10. Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 6870 (2002) 429-433
11. Ernst M.O., and Bulthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cognitive Science 8 4 (2004) 162-169
12. Gallagher S. Body image and body schema. Journal of Mind and Behaviour 7 (1986) 541-554
13. Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind (2005), Oxford University Press, New York
14. Gallagher S., and Cole J. Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behaviour 16 (1995) 369-390
15. Goodwin G.M., McCloskey D.I., and Matthews P.B. Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: Contribution by muscle spindles to perception?. Science 175 28 (1972) 1382-1384
16. Graziano M.S.A., and Botvinick M.M. How the brain represents the body: Insights from neurophysiology and psychology. In: Gopher D., and Koriat A. (Eds). Application attention, performance, XVII., - cognitive regulation of performance interaction of theory (1999) 136-157
17. Haffenden A.M., and Goodale M.A. Independent effects of pictorial displays on perception and action. Vision Research 40 (2000) 1597-1607
18. Haggard P., and Wolpert D.M. Disorders of body schema. In: Freund H.J., Jeannerod M., Hallet M., and Leiguarda R. (Eds). Higher-order motor disorders (2005), Oxford University Press Chapter 14
19. Head H., and Holmes H.G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 34 (1911-1912) 102-254
20. Jeannerod M., and Rossetti Y. Visuomotor coordination as a dissociable visual function: Experimental and clinical evidence. Baillieres Clincal Neurology 2 2 (1993) 439-460
21. Kitada R., Naito E., and Matsumura M. Perceptual changes in illusory wrist flexion angles resulting from motor imagery of the same wrist movements. Neuroscience 4 (2002) 701-707
22. Lackner J.R. Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 111 Pt. 2 (1988) 281-297
23. Milner A.D., and Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action (1995), Oxford University Press
24. Naito E., and Ehrsson H.H. Kinesthetic illusion of wrist movement activates motor-related areas. Neuroreport 12 17 (2001) 3805-3809
25. Naito E., Ehrsson H.H., Geyer S., Zilles K., and Roland P.E. Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Neuroscience 19 14 (1999) 6134-6144
26. Paillard J. Knowing where and knowing how to get there. In: Paillard J. (Ed). Brain and space (1991) 461-481 Chapter 24
27. Paillard J. Body schema and body image: A double dissociation in deafferented patients. In: Gantchev G.N., Mori S., and Massion J. (Eds). Motor control today and tomorrow (1999) 197-214
28. Press C., Taylor-Clarke M., Kennett S., and Haggard P. Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation. Experimental Brain Research 154 2 (2004) 238-245
29. Ramachandran V.S. Consciousness and body image: Lessons from phantom limbs, capgras syndrome and pain asymbolia. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Science 353 1377 (1998) 1851-1859
30. Rogers D.K., Benrups A.P., and Lewis M.M. Disturbed proprioception following a period of muscle vibration in humans. Neuroscience Letters 57 (1985) 147-152
31. Rossetti Y., Rode G., and Boisson D. Implicit processing of somaesthetic information: A dissociation between where and how?. Neuroreport 6 3 (1995) 506-510
32. Rossetti Y., Rode G., and Boisson D. Numbsense: A case study and implications. In: De Gelder B., De Haan E.H.F., and Heywood C.A. (Eds). Out of mind varieties of unconscious processes (2001) 265-292
33. Schwartz A.B., Moran D.W., and Reina G.A. Differential representation of perception and action in the frontal cortex. Science 303 5656 (2004) 380-383
34. Schwoebel J., and Coslett H.B. Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 4 (2005) 543-553
35. Sirigu A., Grafman J., Bressler K., and Sunderland T. Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain 114 Pt. 1B (1991) 629-642
36. Smeets J.B., Brenner E., de Grave D.D., and Cuijpers R.H. Illusions in action: Consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Experimental Brain Research 147 2 (2002) 135-144
37. Tsakiris M., and Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology-human Perception and Performance 31 1 (2005) 80-91
38. van Beers R.J., Sittig A.C., and Gon J.J. Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. Journal of Neurophysiology 81 3 (1999) 1355-1364
39. van Beers R.J., Wolpert D.M., and Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Current Biology 12 10 (2002) 834-837
40. Van Strien J.W. Classificatie van links- en rechtshandige proefpersonen. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden 47 (1992) 88-92
41. Westwood D.A., and Goodale M.A. A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping. Experimental Brain Research 153 2 (2003) 253-259
42. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience 1 (1997) 209-216
43. Wolpert D.M., Ghahramani Z., and Jordan M.I. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269 5232 (1995) 1880-1882