When action is not enough: Tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to Body Schema

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 49, Issue 13, 2011, Pages 3750-3757

  Cardinali, L ^a,b,c   Brozzoli, C ^d   Urquizar, C ^a,b,c   Salemme, R ^a,b,c   Roy, A C ^b,c,e   Farne A ^a,b,c  

^a LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE   (France)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^e INSTITUT DES SCIENCES COGNITIVES   (France)

Author keywords

Action; Body Image; Body Schema; Perception; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VOLUNTEER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EXTREMITIES; FEMALE; HUMAN BODY; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; NAMES; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80755139459     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.033     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anema H.A., van Zandvoort M.J.E., de Haan E.H.F., Kappelle L.J., de Kort P.L.M., Jansen B.P.W., et al. A double dissociation between somatosensory processing for perception and action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1615-1620.
2. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S. The body in the brain: Neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends in Neuroscience 1997, 20:560-564.
3. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S.M. The body in the brain revisited. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 200(1):23-25.
4. Bonnier P. L'Aschématie. Revista de Neurologia 1905, 13:605-609.
5. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391(6669):756.
6. Buxbaum L.J., Coslett B.H. Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: Evidence from autotopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001, 18(4):289-306.
7. Cardinali L., Brozzoli C., Farné A. Peripersonal space and body schema: Two labels for the same concept?. Brain Topography 2009, 21:252-260.
8. Cardinali L., Frassinetti F., Brozzoli C., Urquizar C., Roy A.C., Farnè A. Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology 2009, 19(12):R478-R4789.
9. Cole J., Paillard J. Living without touch and peripheral information about body position and movement: Studies with deafferented subjects. The body and the self 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J.L. Bermudez, A. Marcel, N. Eilan (Eds.).
10. Cleret de Langavant, Trinkler I., Cesaro P., Bachoud-Lévi A.C. Heterotopagnosia: When I point at parts of your body. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(7):1745-1755.
11. Dijkerman H.C., De Haan E.H.F. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:189-239.
12. Edin B.B. Quantitative analysis of static strain sensitivity in human mechanoreceptors from hairy skin. Journal of Neurophysiology 1992, 67(5):1105-1113.
13. Ehrsson H.H., Holmes N.P., Passingham R.E. Touching a rubber hand: Feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas. The Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(45):10564-10573.
14. Folegatti A., de Vignemont F., Pavani F., Rossetti Y., Farnè A. Losing one's hand: Visual-proprioceptive conflict affects touch perception. PLoS One 2009, 4(9):e6920.
15. Gallagher S., Cole J. Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior 1995, 16:369-390.
16. Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind 2005, Oxford University Press.
17. Head H., Holmes G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 1911-1912, 34:102-254.
18. Kammers M.P.M., de Vignemont F., Verhagen L., Dijkerman H.C. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:204-211.
19. Kammers M.P.M., Kootker J.A., Hogendoorn H., Dijkerman H.C. How many motoric body representations can we grasp?. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202(1):203-212.
20. Kammers M.P.M., Mulder J., de Vignemont F., Dijkerman H.C. The weight of representing the body: Addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204(3):333-342.
21. Króliczak G., Heard P., Goodale M.A., Gregory R.L. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Brain Research 2006, 1080(1):9-16.
22. Longo M.R., Haggard P. An implicit body representation underlying human position sense. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107:11727-11732.
23. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. Two visual systems re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46(3):774-785.
25. Newport R., Pearce R., Preston C. Fake hands in action: Embodiment and control of supernumerary limbs. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 204:385-395.
26. Paillard J., Michel F., Stelmach G. Localization without content. A tactile analogue of 'blind sight'. Archives of Neurology 1983, 40:548-551.
27. Rossetti Y., Rode G., Boisson D. Implicit processing of somesthetic information: A dissociation between where and how?. Neuroreport 1995, 6:506-510.
28. Rossetti Y., Rode G., Boisson D. Numbsense: A case study and implications. Out of mind. Varieties of unconscious processing 2001, 265-292. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D. Gelder, E.H.F.D. Haan, C.A. Heywood (Eds.).
29. Schwoebel J., Coslett H.B. Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2005, 17(4):543-553.
30. Sirigu A., Grafman J., Bressler K., Sunderland T. Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain 1991, 114:629-642.
31. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
32. de Vignemont F. Body schema and body image - Pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:669-680.
33. deVignemont F., Farnè A. Incorporer des objets et des membres factices: Quelle différence?. Revue de Neuropsychologie 2010, 2:203-211.