Phylotranscriptomics: Saturated third codon positions radically influence the estimation of trees based on next-gen data

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2082-2092

  Breinholt, Jesse W ^a   Kawahara, Akito Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bombycoidea; Lepidoptera; Phylogeny; Saturation; Synonymous substitutions; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BOMBYCOIDEA; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CODON; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INSECT GENOME; LEPIDOPTERA; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOTH; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; SATURATION; SYNONYMOUS SUBSTITUTIONS;

BOMBYCOIDEA; LEPIDOPTERA; PHYLOGENY; SATURATION; SYNONYMOUS SUBSTITUTIONS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CODON; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME, INSECT; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MOTHS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84892660736     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evt157     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Telford MJ. 2010. TranslatorX: multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid translations. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(Suppl 2):W7-W13.
2. Benson DA, et al. 2013. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (1) 36-42.
3. Betancur-R R, Li C, Munroe TA, Ballesteros JA, Ortí G. 2013. Addressing gene tree discordance and non-stationarity to resolve a multi-locus phylogeny of the flatfishes (Teleostei: Pleuronectiformes). Syst Biol. 62 (5) 763-785.
4. Biomatters. 2013. Geneious v5.5.8, [cited 2013 Nov. 8]. Available from: http://www.geneious.com.
5. Buckley TR, Simon C, Chambers GK. 2001. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: the effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Syst Biol. 50:67-86.
6. Bybee SM, et al. 2011. Directed next generation sequencing for phylogenetics: an example using Decapoda (Crustacea). Zool Anz. 250(4):497-506.
7. Chaudhary R, Bansal MS, Wehe A, Fernandez-Baca D, Eulenstein O. 2010. iGTP: a software package for large-scale gene tree parsimony analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11:574.
8. Chaw SM, Walters TW, Chang CC, Hu SH, Chen SH. 2005. A phylogeny of cycads (Cycadales) inferred from chloroplast matK gene, trnK intron, and nuclear rDNA ITS region. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 37(1):214-234.
9. Cho S, et al. 2011. Can deliberately incomplete gene sample augmentation improve a phylogeny estimate for the advanced moths and butterflies (Hexapoda: Lepidoptera) ? Syst Biol. 60 (6) 782-796.
10. Colless DH. 1980. Congruence between morphometricand allozyme data for menidia species: a reappraisal. Syst Zool. 29 (3) 288-299.
11. Cronn R, et al. 2012. Targeted enrichment strategies for next-generation plant biology. Am J Bot. 99(2):291-311.
12. Cunningham CW, Zhu H, Hillis DM. 1998. Best-fit maximum-likelihood models for phylogenetic inference: empirical tests with known phylogenies. Evolution 52(4):978-987.
13. Delsuc F, Tsagkogeorga G, Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2008. Additional molecular support for the new chordate phylogeny. Genesis 46(11):592-604.
14. Ebersberger I, Strauss S, von Haeseler A. 2009. HaMStR: profile hidden Markov model based search for orthologs in ESTs. BMC Evol Biol. 9(1):157.
15. Faircloth BC, et al. 2012. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst Biol. 61 (5) 717-726.
16. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
17. Goloboff P, Farris J, Nixon K. 2008. TNT: a free program for phylogenetic. Cladistics 24:774-786.
18. Goremykin W, Viola R, Hellwig FH. 2009. Removal of noisy characters from chloroplast genome-scale data suggests revision of phylogenetic llacements of Amborella and Ceratophyllum. J Mol Evol. 68(3):197-204.
19. Hittinger CT, Johnston M, Tossberg JT, Rokas A. 2010. Leveraging skewed transcript abundance by RNA-Seq to increase the genomic depth of the tree of life. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 107(4):1476-1481.
20. Huan-Na C, Yu-Zhou D, Bao-Ping Z. 2012. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genomes of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Int J Biol Sci. 8(4):561-579.
21. Hughes J, et al. 2006. Dense taxonomic EST sampling and its applications for molecular systematics of the Coleoptera (beetles). Mol Biol Evol. 23(2):268-278.
22. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(2):511-518.
23. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30 (4) 772-780.
24. Kawahara AY, Mignault AA, Regier JC, Kitching IJ, Mitter C. 2009. Phylogeny and biogeography of hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): evidence from five nuclear genes. PLoS One 4(5):e5719.
25. Kawahara AV, et al. 2011. Increased gene sampling strengthens support for higher-level groups within leaf-mining moths and relatives (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). BMC Evol Biol. 11:182.
26. Kim MJ, Kang AR, Jeong HC, Kim K-G, Kim I. 2011. Reconstructing intraordinal relationships in Lepidoptera using mitochondrial genome data with the description of two newly sequenced lycaenids, Spindasis takanonis and Protantigius superans (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 61(2):436-445.
27. Kuhner MK, Felsenstein J. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol Biol Evol. 11(3):459-468.
28. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho S, Guindon S. 2012. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 29(6):1695-1701.
29. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. 2009. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25 (17) 2286-2288.
30. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21(6):1095-1109.
31. Lemmon AR, Brown JM, Stanger-Hall K, Lemmon EM. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst Biol. 58(1):130-145.
32. Lemmon AR, Emme S, Lemmon EM. 2012. Anchored hybrid enrichment for massively high-throughput phylogenomics. Syst Biol. 61(5):727-744.
33. Li W, Godzik A. 2006. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22(13):1658-1659.
34. Mamanova L, et al. 2010. Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat Methods. 7(2):111-118.
35. McCormack JE, Hird SM, Zellmer AJ, Carstens BC, Brumfield RT. 2013. Applications of next-generation sequencing to phylogeography and phylogenetics. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 66(2):526-538.
36. Meusemann K, et al. 2010. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the arthropod tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 27(11):2451-2464.
37. Minet J. 1991. Tentative reconstruction of the ditrysian phylogeny (Lepidoptera: Glossata). Entomol Scand. 22:69-95.
38. Minet J. 1994. The Bombycoidea: phylogeny and higher classification (Lepidoptera: Glossata). Entomol Scand. 25:63-88.
39. Nabholz B, Künstner A, Wang R, Jarvis ED, Ellegren H. 2011. Dynamic evolution of base composition: causes and consequences in avian phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol. 28(8):2197-2210.
40. Nakatani M, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Saitoh K, Nishida M. 2011. Evolutionary history of Otophysi (Teleostei), a major clade of the modern freshwater fishes: Pangaean origin and Mesozoic radiation. BMC Evol Biol. 11(1):177.
41. Narechania A, et al. 2012. Random addition concatenation analysis: a novel approach to the exploration of phylogenomic signal reveals strong agreement between core and shell genomic partitions in the Cyanobacteria. Genome Biol Evol. 4(1):30-43.
42. Oakley TH, Wolfe JM, Lindgren AR, Zaharoff AK. 2012. Phylotranscriptomics to bring the understudied into the fold: monophyletic Ostracoda, fossil placement and pancrustacean phylogeny. Mol Biol Evol. 30(1):215-233.
43. Pagel M, Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence of character-state data. Syst Biol. 53:571-581.
44. Palumbi SR, Baker CS. 1994. Contrasting population structure from nuclear intron sequences and mtDNA of humpback whales. Mol Biol Evol. 11(3):426-435.
45. Regier JC, Mitter C, Peigler RS, Friedlander TP. 2002. Monophyly, composition, and relationships within Saturniinae (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae): evidence from two nuclear genes. Insect Syst Evol. 33(1):9-21.
46. Regier JC, Paukstadt U, Paukstadt LH, Mitter C, Peigler RS. 2005. Phylogenetics of eggshell morphogenesis in Antheraea (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae): unique origin and repeated reduction of the aeropyle crown. Syst Biol. 54(2):254-267.
47. Regier JC, et al. 2008a. Phylogenetic relationships of wild silkmoths (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) inferred from four protein-coding nuclear genes. Syst Entomol. 33(2):219-228.
48. Regier JC, et al. 2008b. Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Syst Biol. 57(6):920-938.
49. Regier JC, et al. 2009. Toward reconstructing the evolution of advanced moths and butterflies (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia): an initial molecular study. BMC Evol Biol. 9(1):280.
50. Regier JC, et al. 2010. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature 463(7284):1079-1083.
51. Regier JC, et al. 2013. A large-scale, higher-level, molecular phylogenetic study of the insect order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies). PLoS One 8(3):e58568.
52. Sharanowski BJ, et al. 2010. Expressed sequence tags reveal Proctotrupomorpha (minus Chalcidoidea) as sister to Aculeata (Hymenoptera: Insecta). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 57(1):101-112.
53. Simon S, Narechania A, DeSalle R, Hadrys H. 2012. Insect phylogenomics: exploring the source of incongruence using new transcriptomic data. Genome Biol Evol. 4(12):1295-1309.
54. Sohn J-C, et al. 2013. A molecular phylogeny for Yponomeutoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Ditrysia) and its implications for classification, biogeography and the evolution of host plant use. PLoS One 8(1):e55066.
55. Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Savolainen V, Crane PR, Barraclough TG. 2002. Rate heterogeneity among lineages of tracheophytes: integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence for molecular living fossils. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 99(7):4430-4435.
56. Song N, Liang A-P, Bu C-P. 2012. A Molecular phylogeny of Hemiptera inferred from mitochondrial genome sequences. PLoS One 7(11):e48778.
57. Song H, Sheffield NC, Cameron SL, Miller KB, Whiting MF. 2010. When phylogenetic assumptions are violated: base compositional heterogeneity and among-site rate variation in beetle mitochondrial phylogenomics. Syst Entomol. 35(3):429-448.
58. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22 (21) 2688-2690.
59. Sullivan J. 1996. Combining data with different distributions of among-site rate variation. Syst Biol. 45 (3) 375-380.
60. Surget-Groba Y, Montoya-Burgos JI. 2010. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from next-generation sequencing data. Genome Res. 20(10):1432-1440.
61. Talavera G, Vila R. 2011. What is the phylogenetic signal limit from mitogenomes? The reconciliation between mitochondrial and nuclear data in the Insecta class phylogeny. BMC Evol Biol. 11(1):315.
62. Trautwein MD, Wiegmann BM, Beutel R, Kjer KM, Yeates DK. 2012. Advances in insect phylogeny at the dawn of the postgenomic era. Annu Rev Entomol. 57(1):449-468.
63. van Nieukerken EJ, et al. 2011. Order Lepidoptera Linnaeus, 1758. In: Zhang Z-Q, editor. Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148:212-221.
64. von Reumont BM, et al. 2011. Pancrustacean phylogeny in the light of new phylogenomic data: support for Remipedia as the possible sister group of Hexapoda. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1031-1045.
65. Wheat CW, Wahlberg N. 2013. Phylogenomic insights into the cambrian explosion, the colonization of land and the evolution of flight in Arthropoda. Syst Biol. 62(1):93-109.
66. Whitfield JB, Kjer KM. 2008. Ancient rapid radiations of insects: challenges for phylogenetic analysis. Annu Rev Entomol. 53:449-472.
67. Wiens JJ. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst Biol. 52(4):528-538.
68. Wiens JJ, Morrill MC. 2011. Missing data in phylogenetic analysis: reconciling results from simulations and empirical data. Syst Biol. 60(5):719-731.
69. Wu C-S, Chaw S-M, Huang Y-Y. 2013. Chloroplast phylogenomics indicates that Ginkgo biloba is sister to cycads. Genome Biol Evol. 5(1):243-254.
70. Xia X, Xie Z, Salemi M, Chen L, Wang Y. 2003. An index of substitution saturation and its application. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 26(1):1-7.
71. Xia Q, et al. 2004. A draft sequence for the genome of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori). Science 306(5703):1937-1940.
72. Yang Z. 1996a. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol Evol. 11(9):367-372.
73. Yang Z. 1996b. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J Mol Evol. 42(5):587-96.
74. You M, et al. 2013. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification. Nat Genet. 45 (2) 220-225.
75. Zhan S, Merlin C, Boore JL, Reppert SM. 2011. The monarch butterfly genome yields insights into long-distance migration. Cell 147(5):1171-1185.
76. Zwick A, Regier JC, Mitter C, Cummings MP. 2011. Increased gene sampling yields robust support for higher-level clades within Bombycoidea (Lepidoptera). Syst Entomol. 36 (1) 31-43.
77. Zwick A, Regier JC, Zwickl DJ. 2012. Resolving discrepancy between nucleotides and amino acids in deep-level arthropod phylogenomics: differentiating serine codons in 21-amino-acid models. PLoS One 7(11):e47450.