Can deliberately incomplete gene sample augmentation improve a phylogeny estimate for the advanced moths and butterflies (hexapoda: Lepidoptera)?

Systematic Biology

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 782-796

  Cho, Soowon ^a,b   Zwick, Andreas ^c   Regier, Jerome C ^c   Mitter, Charles ^a   Cummings, Michael P ^a   Yao, Jianxiu ^c,d   Du, Zaile ^c   Zhao, Hong ^c   Kawahara, Akito Y ^a   Weller, Susan ^e   Davis, Donald R ^f   Baixeras, Joaquin ^g   Brown, John W ^h   Parr, Cynthia ^f  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b Chungbuk National University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^f SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^h AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ditrysia; gene sampling; Hexapoda; Lepidoptera; missing data; molecular phylogenetics; nuclear genes; taxon sampling

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETICS; LEPIDOPTERA; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; GENES, INSECT; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; LEPIDOPTERA; NUCLEOTIDES; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

APODITRYSIA; DITRYSIA; GELECHIOIDEA; HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; MACROLEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 80054890843     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syr079     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Bazinet A.L., Cummings M.P. 2009. The lattice project: a grid research and production environment combining multiple grid computing models. In: Weber M.H.W., editor. Distributed and grid computing-science made transparent for everyone. Principles, applications and supporting communities. Marburg (Germany): Tectum Publishing House. p. 2-13.
2. Brower A.V.Z., DeSalle R. 1998. Mitochondrial vs. nuclear DNA sequence evolution among nymphalid butterfies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Mol. Biol. 7:1-10.
3. Burleigh J.G., Hilu K.W., Soltis D.E. 2009. Inferring phylogenies with incomplete data sets: a 5-gene, 567-taxon analysis of angiosperms. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:61.
4. Cummings M.P., Huskamp J.C. 2005. Grid computing. EDUCAUSE Rev. 40:116-117.
5. de Queiroz A., Gatesy J. 2007. The supermatrix approach to systemat-ics. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22:34-41.
6. Driskell A.C., Ané C., Burleigh J.G., McMahon M.M., O'Meara B.C., Sanderson M.J. 2004. Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science. 306:1172-1174. (Pubitemid 39488993)
7. Fang Q., Cho S., Regier J., Mitter C., Matthews M., Poole R., Friedlander T., Zhao S. 1997. A new nuclear gene for insect phylo-genetics: dopa decarboxylase is informative of relationships within Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Syst. Biol. 46:269-283. (Pubitemid 127363918)
8. Farrell B.D., Sequeira A.S., O'Meara B., Normark B.B., Chung J.H., Jordal B.H. 2001. The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculion-idae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). Evolution. 55:2011-2027. (Pubitemid 34003823)
9. Graybeal A. 1998. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47:9-17. (Pubitemid 128449782)
10. Grimaldi D., Engel M.S. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
11. Hartmann S., Vision T.J. 2008. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment? BMC Evol. Biol. 8:95.
12. Hausmann A., editor. 2003. The Forum Herbulot world list of family group names in Geometridae. Available from: http://www.herbulot.de/.
13. Hittinger C.T., Johnston M., Tossberg J.T., Rokas A. 2010. Leveraging skewed transcript abundance by RNA-sequencing to increase the genomic depth of the tree of life. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:1476-1481.
14. Holloway J.D. 1997. The moths of Borneo, pt. 10, Geometridae: Ster-rhinae, Larentiinae. Malay Nat. J. 51:1-242.
15. Huelsenbeck J.P. 1991. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phy-logenetic analysis? Syst. Zool. 40:458-469.
16. Jian S., Soltis P.S., Gitzendanner M.A., Moore M.J., Li R., Hendry T.A., Qiu Y.-L., Dhingra A., Bell C.D., Soltis D.E. 2008. Resolving an ancient, rapid radiation in Saxifragales. Syst. Biol. 57:38-57.
17. Kristensen N.P. 1998. Lepidoptera, moths and butterfies, volume 1: evolution, systematics, and biogeography. In: Fischer M., editor. Handbook of zoology: a natural history of the phyla of the animal kingdom, volume IV, Arthropoda: Insecta, part 35, Lepidoptera, moths and butterfies. Berlin (Germany): Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
18. Kristensen N.P., Skalski A.W. 1998. Phylogeny and palaeontology. In: Kristensen N.P., editor. Handbook of zoology: a natural history of the phyla of the animal kingdom, Volume IV, Arthropoda: In-secta, part 35, Lepidoptera, moths and butterfies, Volume 1: evolution, systematics, and biogeography. Berlin (Germany): Walter de Gruyter, Inc. p. 7-25.
19. Lemmon A.R., Brown J.M., Stanger-Hall K., Lemmon E.M. 2009. The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst. Biol. 58:130-145.
20. Minet J. 1983. Étude morphologique et phylogénétique des organes tympaniques des Pyraloidea. Généralités et homologies. (Lep. Glossata). Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N.S.). 19:175-207.
21. Minet J. 1991. Tentative reconstruction of the ditrysian phylogeny (Lepidoptera: Glossata). Ent. Scand. 22:69-95.
22. Moulton J.K., Wiegmann B.M. 2003. Evolution and phylogenetic utility of CAD (rudimentary) among Mesozoic-aged eremoneuran Diptera (Insecta). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:363-378. (Pubitemid 38403343)
23. Mutanen M., Wahlberg N., Kaila L. 2010. Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butter-fies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 277:2839-2848.
24. Philippe H., Snell E.A., Bapteste E., Lopez P., Holland P.W., Casane D. 2004. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: impact of missing data on large alignments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1740-1752. (Pubitemid 39096890)
25. Posada D. 2008. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:1253-1256. (Pubitemid 351882013)
26. Rammert U. 1994. Morphologische Untersuchungen zur Aufdeck-ung der stammesgeschichtliche Verhältnisse der basalen Gruppen der ditrysen Lepidopteren (Lepidoptera: Ditrysia) [dissertation]. Flintbek (Germany): Universität Bielefeld 193 pp., 25 pls.
27. Ratnasingham S., Hebert P.D. 2007. Bold: the barcode of life data system. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7:355-364. Available from: http://www.barcodinglife.org/. (Pubitemid 46714172)
28. Regier J.C., Cook C.P., Mitter C., Hussey A. 2008. A phylogenetic study of the "bombycoid complex" (Lepidoptera) using five protein-coding nuclear genes, with comments on the problem of macrolepi-dopteran phylogeny. Syst. Ent. 33:175-189.
29. Regier J.C., Fang Q.Q., Mitter C., Peigler R.S., Friedlander T.P., Solis M.A. 1998. Evolution and phylogenetic utility of the period gene in Lepidoptera. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1172-1182. (Pubitemid 28394952)
30. Regier J.C., Grant M.C., Peigler R.S., Mitter C., Cook C.P., Rougerie R. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of wild silkmoths (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) inferred from four protein-coding nuclear genes. Syst. Ent. 33:219-228. (Pubitemid 351379684)
31. Regier J.C., Shultz J.W., Ganley A.R.D., Hussey A., Shi D., Ball B., Zwick A., Stajich J.E., Cummings M.P., Martin J.W., Cunningham C.W. 2008. Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Syst. Biol. 57:920-938.
32. Regier J.C., Shultz J.W., Zwick A., Hussey A., Ball B., Wetzer R., Martin J.W., Cunningham C.W. 2010. Arthropod relationships revealed by phylogenomic analysis of nuclear protein-coding sequences. Nature. 463:1079-1083.
33. Regier J.C., Zwick A., Cummings M.P., Kawahara A.Y., Cho S., Weller S., Roe A., Baixeras J., Brown J.W., Parr C., Davis D.R., Epstein M., Hallwachs W., Hausmann A., Janzen D.H., Kitching I.J., Solis M.A., Yen S.-H., Bazinet A.L., Mitter C. 2009. Toward reconstructing the evolution of advanced moths and butterfies (Lep-idoptera: Ditrysia): an initial molecular study. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:280.
34. Robinson G.S., Nielsen E.S. 1993. Tineid genera of Australia. Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera. 2:1-344.
35. Sanderson M.J. 1989. Confdence limits on phylogenies: the bootstrap revisited. Cladistics. 5:113-129. (Pubitemid 19315929)
36. Scoble M.J. 1992. The Lepidoptera, form, function and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Scoble M.J. 1999. Geometrid moths of the world: a catalogue (Lep-idoptera, Geometridae). Volume 1 and 2. Stenstrup (Denmark): CSIRO Publishing and Apollo Books.
38. Seo T.-K., Kishino H. (2009). Statistical comparison of nucleotide-, amino-acid-, and codon-substitution models for the evolutionary analysis of protein-coding sequences. Syst. Biol. 58: 199-210.
39. Smith S.W., Overbeck R., Woese C.R., Gilbert W., Gillevet P.M. 1994. The genetic data environment and expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:671-675.
40. Solis M.A., Maes K.V.N. 2002. Preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the subfamilies of Crambidae (Pyraloidea: Lepidoptera). Belgian J. Entom. 4:53-95.
41. Susko E. 2009. Bootstrap support is not frst-order correct. Syst. Biol. 58:211-223.
42. Staden R. 1999. Staden package. Cambridge (UK): MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology. Available from: http://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac. uk/pubseq/.
43. Swofford, D.L. 2003. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b 10. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
44. Thomson R.C., Shaffer H.B. 2010. Sparse supermatrices for phylo-genetic inference: taxonomy, alignment, rogue taxa, and the phy-logeny of living turtles. Syst. Biol. 59:42-58.
45. Wiens J.J. 1998. Does adding characters with missing data increase or decrease phylogenetic accuracy? Syst. Biol. 47:625-640. (Pubitemid 128370902)
46. Wiens J.J. 2003. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 52:528-538. (Pubitemid 36990380)
47. Wiens J.J. 2006. Missing data and the design of phylogenetic analyses. J. Biomed. Inform. 39:34-42. (Pubitemid 43138915)
48. Wiens J.J., Fetzner J.W., Parkinson C.L., Reeder T.W. 2005. Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Syst. Biol. 54:719-748. (Pubitemid 43142292)
49. Wiens J.J., Moen D.S. 2008. Missing data and the accuracy of Bayesian phylogenetics. J. Syst. Evol. 46:307-314.
50. Wiens J.J., Reeder T.W. 1995. Combining data sets with different numbers of taxa for phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 44: 548-558. (Pubitemid 126021228)
51. Yang Z., Nielsen R., Goldman N., Pedersen A.-M.K. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics. 155:431-449. (Pubitemid 30257141)
52. Young C.J. 2006. Molecular relationships of the Australian Ennominae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) and implications for the phylogeny of the Geometridae from molecular and morphological data. Zootaxa. 1264:1-147.
53. Zharkikh A., Li W.-H. 1995. Estimation of confdence in phylogeny: the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:44-63.
54. Zwick A., Regier J.C., Mitter C., Cummings M.P. 2011. Increased gene sampling yields robust support for higher-level clades within Bom-bycoidea (Lepidoptera). Syst. Ent. 36:31-43.
55. Zwickl D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion[PhD dissertation]. Austin (TX): The University of Texas.