Immediate and Long-Term Effects of Tier 2 Reading Instruction for First-Grade Students With a High Probability of Reading Failure

Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 28-53

  Case, Lisa ^a   Speece, Deborah ^b   Silverman, Rebecca ^a   Schatschneider, Christopher ^c   Montanaro, Elizabeth ^d   Ritchey, Kristen ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

first grade; reading intervention; response to intervention; Tier 2

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892415175     PISSN: 19345747     EISSN: 19345739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19345747.2013.786771     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams, M. J. 1992. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allor, J. and McCathren, R. 2004. The efficacy of an early literacy tutoring program implemented by college students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19: 116 - 129.
3. Al Otaiba, S. and Fuchs, D. 2006. Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39: 414 - 431.
4. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173 - 1182.
5. Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G. and Saunders, L. 2009. Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42: 85 - 95.
6. Bryk, A. S. and Raudenbush, S. W. 1992. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Case, P. C., Speece, D. L., Silverman, R., Ritchey, K. D., Schatschneider, C. Cooper, D. H. 2010. Validation of a supplemental reading intervention for first-grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43: 402 - 417. doi: 10.1177/0022219409355475
8. Cirino, P. T., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Cardenas-Hagan, E., Fletcher, J. M. and Francis, D. J. 2009. One-year follow-up of Spanish and English interventions for English language learners at risk for reading problems. American Educational Research Journal, 46: 744 - 781.
9. Connor, C., Piasta, S. B., Fishman, B., Glasney, S., Schatschneider, C., Crowe, E. and Morrison, F. J. 2009. Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of Child × Instruction interactions on first grader's literacy development. Child Development, 80: 77 - 100.
10. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J. and Simmons, D. C. 2004. Improving beginning reading instruction and intervention for students with LD: Reconciling "all" with "each. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37: 231 - 239.
11. Denton, C. A., Cirino, P. T., Barth, A. E., Romain, M., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J. and Fletcher, J. M. 2011. An experimental study of scheduling and duration of "Tier 2" first-grade reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4: 208 - 230. doi: 10.1080/ 19345747.2010.530127
12. Denton, C. A. and Hocker, J. L. 2005. Responsive reading: Flexible intervention for struggling readers in the early grades, Longwood, CO: Sopris West.
13. Dr. Maggie's phonics readers: A new view. 1999. Cyprus, CA: Creative Teaching Press.
14. Ehri, L. 1998. " Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English ". In Word recognition in beginning literacy, Edited by: Metsala, J. and Ehri, L. 3 - 40. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Thompson, A. McMaster, K. n.d. First grade reading PALS: Teacher manual, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
16. Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. 1992. Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21: 45 - 58.
17. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L. and Allinder, R. M. 1991. Effects of expert system advice within curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in spelling. School Psychology Review, 20: 49 - 66.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L. and Fuchs, D. 1990. Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic reading, Austin, TX: ProEd.
19. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S. and Tilly, W. D. 2008. Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045), Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/
20. Gresham, F. and Elliott, S. 1990. Social Skills Rating System Manual, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
21. Hopkins, W. G. 2002. A scale of magnitude for effect statisitics. A new view of statistics, Retrieved from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html
22. Ihnot, C. 2002. Read naturally: Group and tutoring edition Level 8. St., Paul, MN: Read Naturally, Inc.
23. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, § 601, Stat. 2647 2004
24. Lane, H. B., Pullen, P. C., Hudson, R. F. and Konold, T. R. 2009. Identifying essential instructional components of literacy tutoring for struggling beginning readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48: 277 - 297.
25. Lane, K. L., Fletcher, T., Carter, E. W., Dejud, C. and DeLorenzo, J. 2007. Paraprofessional-led phonological awareness training with youngsters at risk for reading and behavioral concerns. Remedial and Special Education, 28: 266 - 276.
26. Learn to Read Book Series. 1983. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27. Lembke, E. S., McMaster, K. L. and Stecker, P. M. 2010. The prevention science of reading research within a response-to-intervention model. Psychology in the Schools, 47: 22 - 35.
28. Marston, D. B. 1989. " A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it ". In Curriculum-based measurement, Edited by: Shinn, M. R. 18 - 78. New York, NY: Guilford.
29. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J. and Schatschneider, C. 2005. The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40: 148 - 182. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.2
30. McIntyre, E., Rightmyer, E. and Petrosko, J. 2008. Scripted and unscripted reading instructional models: Effects on the phonics and reading achievement of first grade struggling readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24: 377 - 407.
31. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. 2000. Report of National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754), Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
32. Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., Lloyd, J. W., Nowak, R. and Ryals, J. 2005. Effects of explicit instruction on decoding of struggling first grade students: A data-based case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 28: 63 - 76.
33. Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B. and Monaghan, M. C. 2004. Effects of a volunteer tutoring model on the early literacy development of first grade students. Reading Research and Instruction, 43: 21 - 40.
34. Rabiner, D. L., Malone, P. S. and CPPRG. 2004. The impact of tutoring on early reading achievement of children with and without attention problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32: 273 - 284.
35. Ritchey, K. D., Coker, D. L. and McCraw, S. B. 2010. A comparison of metrics for scoring beginning spelling. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35: 78 - 88. doi: 10.1177/1534508409336087
36. Ritchey, K. D., Silverman, R. D., Montanaro, E. A., Speece, D. L. and Schatschneider, C. 2012. Effects of a Tier 2 supplemental reading intervention for at-risk fourth grade students. Exceptional Children, 78: 318 - 334.
37. Ryder, J. F., Tunmer, W. E. and Greaney, K. T. 2008. Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing, 21: 349 - 369.
38. Savage, R. and Carless, S. 2005. Learning support assistants can deliver effective reading intervention for 'at-risk' children. Educational Research, 47: 45 - 61. doi: 10.1080/0013188042000337550
39. Savage, R., Carless, S. and Erten, O. 2009. The longer-term effects of reading interventions delivered by experienced teaching assistants. Support for Learning, 24: 95 - 100.
40. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
41. Simmons, D. C., Kame'enui, E. J., Harn, B., Coyne, M. D., Stoolmiller, M., Sanotoro, L. E. and Kaufman, N. K. 2007. Attributes of effective and efficient kindergarten reading intervention: An examination of instructional time and design specificity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40: 331 - 347.
42. Speece, D. L., DaDeppo, L., Hines, S. and Walker, C. 2005. " Graphophonemic fluency study ". [Unpublished raw data]
43. Speece, D. L., Schatchneider, C., Silverman, R., Case, L. P., Cooper, D. H. and Jacobs, D. 2011. Identification of reading problems in first grade within a Response-to-Intervention framework. The Elementary School Journal, 111: 585 - 607.
44. Sprick, M. M., Howard, L. M. and Fidanque, A. 1998. Read well: Critical foundations in primary reading, Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
45. Stage, S. A., Abbott, R. D., Jenkins, J. R. and Berninger, V. W. 2003. Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36: 24 - 33.
46. Swets, J. A. 1986. Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models. Psychological Bulletin, 99: 100 - 117.
47. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K. and Rashotte, C. A. 1999. Test of Word Reading Efficiency: Examiner's manual, Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
48. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Herron, J. and Lindamood, P. 2010. Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60: 40 - 56.
49. Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A. and Abbott, R. D. 2008. Effects of supplemental early reading intervention at 2-year follow up: Reading skill growth patterns and predictors. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2: 51 - 89.
50. Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A. and Peyton, J. A. 2005. Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38: 364
51. Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Small, S. and Fanuele, D. P. 2006. Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39: 157 - 169.
52. Vernon-Feagans, L., Gallagher, K., Ginsberg, M. C., Amendum, S., Kainz, K., Rose, J. and Burchinal, M. 2010. A diagnostic teaching intervention for classroom teachers: Helping struggling readers in early elementary school. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25: 183 - 193.
53. Wanzek, J. and Vaughn, S. 2007. Research-based implications from extensive early reading intervention. School Psychology Review, 36: 541 - 561.
54. Wilson Language Basics Level K-1. 2002. Fundations, Oxford, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation.
55. Woodcock, R. 1998. Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised/Normative Update, Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
56. Zirkel, P. and Davis, L. B. 2010. State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42: 56 - 63.