Effects of a tier 2 supplemental reading intervention for at-risk fourth-grade students

Exceptional Children

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 318-334

  Ritchey, Kristen D ^a   Silverman, Rebecca D ^b   Montanaro, Elizabeth A ^b   Speece, Deborah L ^b   Schatschneider, Christopher ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858652509     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440291207800304     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly 26, 89-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1593592 (Pubitemid 36966857)
2. Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford.
3. Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506-521. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.506
4. Case, L. P., Speece, D. L., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review, 32, 557-582. (Pubitemid 38148551)
5. Catts, H. W., Hogan, T. P., & Adlof, S. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 25-40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194020 350050101
7. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Elleman, A. M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Tracking children who fly below the radar: Latent transition modeling of students with late-emerging reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 329-337. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/j.lindif.2008. 04.003
8. Cunningham, P. M. (1998). The multisyllabic word dilemma: Helping students build meaning, spell, and read "big" words. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14, 189-218. http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/1057356980140204
9. Diliberto, J. A., Beattie, J. R., Flowers, C. P., & Algozzine, R. F. (2009). Effects of teaching syllable skills instruction on reading achievement in struggling middle school readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 14-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1938807080 2226253
10. Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262-300. http://dx.doi.org/10. 3102/00346543083 25998
11. Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading "posse." Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 123-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1510519
12. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P., & Simmons, D. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206. http://dx. doi.org/10.2307/1163346
13. Fuchs, L. S. (n.d.). Project PROACT maze reading passages. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
14. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45-58.
15. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204-219.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic reading. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
17. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164. (Pubitemid 40273032)
18. Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002279
19. Graves, A. W. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disability Research, 1, 90-100.
20. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). The social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
21. Grigg, W. S., Daane, M. C., Jin, Y., & Campbell, J. R. (2003). The nations report card: Reading 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from http://nces.ed .gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2002/2003521 .asp
22. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., . . . Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 403-423. http.// dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
23. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Scaffolding for motivation and engagement in reading. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & K. C. Perencevich, (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 55-86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636-644. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.7.3 (Pubitemid 44884661)
25. Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J. D., Stein, M. L., & Haynes, M. C. (1987). Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements. Exceptional Children, 54, 54-59.
26. Leach, J., Scarborough, H., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211-224. (Pubitemid 36754805)
27. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., & Wolfinger, R. D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS.
28. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests, Fourth edition, Forms S and T. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
29. Mason, L. (2004). Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questions: Effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 283-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.283
30. Mather, N., Hammill, D. D., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2004). Test of silent word reading fluency: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
31. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ44.3.1
32. Minskoff, E. (2005). Teaching reading to struggling learners. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
33. Miranda, A., Villaescusa, M. I., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (1997). Is attribution retaining necessary? Use of self-regulated procedures for enhancing the reading comprehension strategies of children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 513-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 00222194970300 0506
34. Morgan, P. L., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Cordray, D. S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Does early reading failure decrease children's reading motivation? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 387-404. http://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0022219408321112
35. Nagy, W., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134 (Pubitemid 43551087)
36. Nagy, W. E., & Scott, J. (2000). Vocabulary processes. In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 269-284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). National assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: Institute on Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard
38. O'Connor, R., White, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Repeated reading versus continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74 31-46.
39. O'Connor, R. E., Bell, K., Harty, K., Larkin, L., Sackor, S., & Zigmond, N. (2002). Teaching reading to poor readers in the intermediate grades: A comparison of text difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 474-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94 .3.474
40. O'Connor, R. E., Harty, K. R., & Fulmer, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 532-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380060901 (Pubitemid 41730157)
41. O'Sullivan, R. (2003). Protecting sea turtles. Washington, DC: National Geographic.
42. Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixson, K. K., Campbell, J. R, Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Listening to children read aloud. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
43. Raphael, T. E., & Au, K. H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension and test taking across grades and content areas. Reading Teacher, 59, 206-221. http://dx.doi. org/10.1598/RT59.3.1 (Pubitemid 41703600)
44. Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289-312.
45. Ritchey, K. D., Speece, D. L., Silverman, R. D., & Montanaro, E. (n.d.). Assessment of strategy knowledge and use for information text (ASKIT): Sea turtles (Form A). College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
46. Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479-530. http://dx.doi.org/10 .2307/1170585
47. Simmons, D., Hairrell, A., Edmonds, M., Vaughn, S., Larsen, R., Willson, V., . . . Byrns, G. (2010). A comparison of multiple-strategy methods: Effects on fourth-grade students' general and content-specific reading comprehension and vocabulary development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 121-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1934574l 003596890
48. Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 322-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102 /10769986023004323
49. Snow, C. (Ed.) (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Education. Retrieved from www.rand.org/pubs/monograph-reports/MR1465/MR 1465.pdf
50. Speece, D. L., Ritchey, K. D., Silverman, R. D., Schatschneider, C., Walker, C., & Andrusik, K. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39, 258-276. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3070313/
51. Stage, S. A., Abbott, R. D., Jenkins, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24-33. http://dx .doi.org/10.1177/00222194030360010401 (Pubitemid 36136649)
52. Therrien, W. J., & Hughes, C. (2008). Comparison of repeated reading and question generation on students' reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 6(1), 1-16.
53. Therrien, W. J., Wickstrom, K., & Jones, K. (2006). Effect of a combined repeated reading and question generation intervention on reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(2), 89-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1 11 1/j.1540-5826.2006.00209.x
54. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency: Examiner's manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
55. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409. (Pubitemid 39443188)
56. Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Ciullo, S. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23, 889-912. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
57. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., Mather, N., & Schrank, F. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement, Third edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
58. Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.