Validation of a supplemental reading intervention for first-grade children

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 402-417

  Case, Lisa Pericola ^a   Speece, Deborah L ^a   Silverman, Rebecca ^a   Ritchey, Kristen D ^b   Schatschneider, Christopher ^c   Cooper, David H ^a,d   Montanaro, Elizabeth ^a   Jacobs, Dawn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d ELON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

at risk; first grade; parent rating; reading; response to intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSLEXIA; EARLY CHILDHOOD INTERVENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PARENT; PHONETICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; READING; RISK FACTOR; SPEECH THERAPY; STUDENT; TEACHING; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DYSLEXIA; EARLY INTERVENTION (EDUCATION); FACULTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT DISORDERS; LANGUAGE THERAPY; MALE; PARENTS; PHONETICS; READING; REMEDIAL TEACHING; RISK FACTORS; STUDENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77956255688     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022219409355475     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. AlOtaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300-316.
2. AlOtaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 414-431.
3. Allor, J., & McCathren, R. (2004). The efficacy of an early literacy tutoring program implemented by college students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(2), 116-129.
4. Baker, L., Scher, D., & Mackler, K. (1997). Home and family influences on motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 69-82.
5. Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Brooksher, R., Lemos, Z., Ogier, S., Zook, D.,et al.(2000). A connectionist approach to making the predictability of English orthography explicit to at-risk beginning readers: Evidence for alternative, effective strategies. Developmental Neuropsychology, 17, 241-271.
6. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Case, L.P. & Speece, D.L. (2007). Decodable Word Fluency task. [Unpublished instrument.].
8. Chard, D.J., Stoolmiller, M., Harn, B.A., Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S.,et al.(2008). Predicting reading success in a multilevel schoolwide reading model: A retrospective analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 174-188.
9. Compton, D.L., Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2009). The course of reading and mathematics disability in first grade: Identifying latent class trajectories and early predictors of follow-up disability status. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. Denton, C.A., & Hocker, J.L. (2005). Responsive reading: Flexible intervention for struggling readers in the early grades. Longwood, CO: Sopris West.
11. Francis, D.J., Schatschneider, C., & Carlson, C.D. (2000). Introduction to individual growth curve analysis. In D. Drotar (Ed.), Handbook of research in pediatric and clinical child psychology (pp. 51-73). New York: Plenum.
12. Fuchs, D., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, L.S., Bryant, J., & Davis, G.N. (2008). Making secondary intervention work in a three-tier responsiveness-to-intervention model: Findings from the first-grade longitudinal reading study of the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 413-436.
13. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Thompson, A., McMaster, K.,et al.(n.d.). First grade reading PALS: Teacher manual. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
14. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
15. Fuchs, L.S., Hamlett, C., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring basic skills progress. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
16. Gresham, F., & Elliott, S. (1990). Social Skills Rating System manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17. Hatcher, P.J., Hulme, C., Miles, J.N., Carroll, J.M., Hatcher, J., Gibbs, S.,et al.(2006). Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 820-827.
18. Ihnot, C. (2002). Read Naturally: Group and tutoring edition level 8. St. Paul, MN: Read Naturally.
19. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, § 601, Stat. 2647 (2004).
20. Marston, D.B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
21. McKinney, J.D., Mason, J., Perkerson, K., & Clifford, M. (1975). Relationship between classroom behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 198-203.
22. McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2005). Responding to non-responders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445-463.
23. Morgan, P., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73(2), 165-183.
24. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the subgroups. Washington, DC: Author.
25. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 2 147 Stat. 1425 (2002).
26. Ritchey, K.D., & Coker, D.L. (2008). [Writing Assessment Research Project: Grade 1 Spelling Assessment]. Unpublished raw data.
27. Ryder, J.F., Tunmer, W.E., & Greaney, K.T. (2008). Explicit instruction in phonemic awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing, 21(4), 349-369.
28. Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
29. Speece, D.L., & Case, L.P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735-749.
30. Speece, D.L., Case, L.P., Cooper, D.H., & Schatschneider, C. (2007). [Markers and modification of early reading problems]. Unpublished raw data.
31. Speece, D.L., & Ritchey, K.D. (2005). A longitudinal study of the development of oral reading fluency in young children at risk for reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(5), 387-399.
32. Stage, S.A., Abbott, R.D., Jenkins, J.R., & Berninger, V.W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24-33.
33. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T.,et al.(1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579-593.
34. Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: Examiner manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
35. Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36(4), 541-561.
36. Wilson Language Training. (2002). Fundations. Oxford, MA: Wilson Language Training Corporation.
37. Wood, J.T., Garb, H.N., Nezworski, M.T. (2007). Psychometrics: Better measurement makes better clinicians. In S. O. Lilenfeld & WT. O'Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science (pp. 77-92). New York: Routledge.
38. Woodcock, R. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised/Normative Update. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
39. Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M.B. (1989/1990). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Boston: Teaching Resources.