Evaluating media-enhancement and source authority on the internet: The knowledge integration environment

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 859-871

  Clark, Douglas B ^a   Slotta, James D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0012701392     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/095006900412310     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ANDERSON, R. E. (1984) Inequities in opportunities for computer literacy. Computing Teacher, 11 (8), 10-12.
2. BELL, P., DAVIS, E. A. and LINN, M. C. (1995) The Knowledge Integration Environment: theory and design. In Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL ’95: Bloomington, IN) (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 14-21.
3. BUTLER, B. (1995) Using WWW/Mosaic to support classroom-based education: an experience report. Interpersonal Computing and Technology Journal, 3 (1), 17-52.
4. CAVALLI-SFORZA, V., WEINER, A. and LESGOLD, A. (1994) Software support for students engaging in scientific activity and scientific controversy. Science Education, 78 (6), 577-599.
5. CHAIKEN, S., LIEBERMAN, A. and EAGLY, A. (1989) Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (eds.), Unintended Thought (New York: Guilford Press).
6. CHEEK, D. W. and AGRUSO, S. (1995) Gender and equity issues in computer-based science assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4 (1), 75-79.
7. EDELL, J. A. and STAELIN, R. (1983) The information processing of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 45-61.
8. HASHER, L. and ZACKS, R. T. (1979) Automatic and effortful processes in memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.
9. HASS, R. G. (1981) Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom and T. C. Brock (eds.), Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 141-172.
10. HASTIE, R., PENROD, S. D. and PENNINGTON, N. (1984) Inside the Jury (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press).
11. HOVLAND, C. I., JANIS, I. L. and KELLEY, H. H. (1953) Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change (New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press).
12. HUMPHREYS, M. S., BAIN, J. D. and PIKE, R. (1989) Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: a theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
13. JACOBY, L. L. and DALLAS, M. (1981) On the relationship between auto biographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 300-340.
14. JOHNSON, D. (1995) Captured by the web: K-12 schools and the world-wide web. MultiMedia Schools, 2 (2), 24-30.
15. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S. and LINDSAY, D. S. (1993) Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114 (1), 3-28.
16. KOZMA, R. (1991) Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61 (2), 179-211.
17. KUHN, D. (1993) Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77 (3), 319-337.
18. LEVIE, W. H. and LENTZ, R. (1982) Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30 (4), 195-232.
19. LEWONTIN, A. (1995) Mosaic in the classroom. Computers in Libraries, 15 (2), 24-26.
20. LINN, M. C. (2000) Designing the knowledge integration environment International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 781-796.
21. LINN, M. C. (1995) Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: the scaffolded knowledge integration framework. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4 (2), 103-126.
22. LINN, M., BELL, P. and HSI, S. (1998) Using the Internet to enhance student understanding of science: The Knowledge Integration Environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1/2), 4-38.
23. MADDUX, J. E. and ROGERS, R. W. (1980) Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness, and supporting arguments on persuasion: a case of brains over beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 235-244.
24. MCGUIRE, W. J. (1985) Attitudes and attitude change. In G. A. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (3rd ed) (New York: Random House (distributed by Erlbaum)) Vol. 2.
25. MCKOON, G., RATCLIFF, R. and DELL, G. S. (1986) A critical evaluation of the semanticepisodic distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 295-306.
26. MOORE, M. V. and NAWROCKI, L. H. (1979) The educational effectiveness of graphic displays for computer assisted instruction. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 9 (55).
27. PALLAS, A. M. (1988) Who Falls Behind: Defining the ‘At-Risk’ Population-Current Dimensions and Future Trends, ERIC Document No.: ED312330.
28. PEECK, J. and JANS, M. W. (1987) Delayed retention of orally presented text with pictorial support. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 57 (3), 412-416.
29. PENG, S. (1995) Understanding Racial-Ethnic Differences in Secondary School Science and Mathematics Achievement Research and Development Report.
30. RANNEY, M. and SCHANK, P. (1995) Protocol Modeling, Textual Analysis, the Bifurcation/Bootstrapping Method, and Convince Me: Computer-Based Techniques for Studying Beliefs and Their Revision. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 239-243.
31. REINARD, J. C. (1988) The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: the status after fifty years of research. Human Communications Research, 15, 3-59.
32. ROCHELEAU, B. (1995) Computer use by school-age children: trends, patterns, and predictors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12 (1), 1-17.
33. ROHWER, W. D. and HARRIS, W. J. (1975) Media effects on prose learning in two populations of children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67 (5), 651-657.
34. SHIMURA, A. P. and SQUIRE, L. R. (1991) The relationship between fact and source memory: findings from amnesiac patients and normal subjects. Psychobiology, 19 (1), 1-10.
35. STEVENS, F. I. and GRYMES, J. (1993) Opportunity to Learn: Issues of Equity for Poor and Minority Students (Washington, DC: National Centre for Education Statistics).
36. STUKAT, K. G. (1958) Suggestibility: a factorial and experimental analysis (Uppsala: Appelbergs Boktryckeri Ab.).
37. SUTTON, R. E. (1991) Equity and computers in the schools: a decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61 (4), 475-503.
38. TABAK, I., SANDOVAL, B., AGGELICI, A., BAUMGARTNER, E. and REISER, B. (1995) Supporting Collaborative Guided Inquiry in a Learning Environment for Biology. Paper presented at the CSCL Proceedings.
39. TULVING, E. (1986) What kind of hypothesis is the distinction between episodic and semantic memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 307-311.
40. WETZEL, D., RADTKE, P. and STERN, H. (1994) Processing visual and verbal information, Instructional Effectiveness of Video Media, (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
41. WINN, W. (1989) The design and use of instructional graphics. In H. Mandl and J. Levin (eds.), Knowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures. Advances in Psychology, (Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland), 329.