A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Milot, Marie Hélène ^a,b   Spencer, Steven J ^b   Chan, Vicky ^b   Allington, James P ^b   Klein, Julius ^b   Chou, Cathy ^b   Bobrow, James E ^b   Cramer, Steven C ^b   Reinkensmeyer, David J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Activity of daily living; Function; Robot; Stroke; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM EXOSKELETON; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELBOW; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL TRAINING; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PILOT STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZATION; RATING SCALE; ROBOTIC EXOSKELETON; SHOULDER; SURVIVOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VELOCITY; ARM; BRACE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT; KINESIOTHERAPY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PARESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; STROKE REHABILITATION;

ARM; BRACES; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PARESIS; PILOT PROJECTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84891434328     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-112     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American heart association. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K, Gillespie C, et al. Circulation 2010 121 46 e215 20019324
2. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, Ringer RJ, Wagner TH, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, et al. N Engl J Med 2010 362 1772 1783 10.1056/NEJMoa0911341 20400552
3. Do robotic and non-robotic arm movement training drive motor recovery after stroke by a common neural mechanism? Experimental evidence and a computational model. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Maier MA, Guigon E, Chan V, Akoner O, Wolbrecht ET, Cramer SC, Bobrow JE, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009 2009 2439 2441 19965205
4. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. Huang VS, Krakauer JW, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 5 10.1186/1743-0003-6-5 19243614
5. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E, Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004 22 281 299 15502272 (Pubitemid 39480654)
6. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. Pignolo L, J Rehabil Med 2009 41 955 960 10.2340/16501977-0434 19841823
7. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006 3 12 10.1186/1743-0003-3-12 16790067 (Pubitemid 44252716)
8. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. Krebs HI, Mernoff S, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Stein J, Hogan N, Neuro Rehabilitation 2008 23 81 87 18356591 (Pubitemid 352038564)
9. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 952 959 10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 12098155 (Pubitemid 34747579)
10. Comparison of three-dimensional, assist-as-needed robotic arm/hand movement training provided with Pneu-WREX to conventional tabletop therapy after chronic stroke. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Chou C, Cramer SC, Bobrow JE, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012 91 232 241 23080039
11. Effects of intensive arm training with the rehabilitation robot ARMin II in chronic stroke patients: four single-cases. Staubli P, Nef T, Klamroth-Marganska V, Riener R, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009 6 46 10.1186/1743-0003-6-46 20017939
12. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, Motiwala RR, Cramer SC, Brain 2008 131 425 437 10.1093/brain/awm311 18156154 (Pubitemid 351197615)
13. Schmidt R, Lee T, Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis Champaign, IL: United States Human Kinetics 2005
14. Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Balasubramanian S, Klein J, Burdet E, Curr Opin Neurol 2010 23 661 670 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833e99a4 20852421
15. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 505 514 10.1177/1545968308331148 19237734
16. A simple test of visual neglect. Albert ML, Neurology 1973 23 658 664 10.1212/WNL.23.6.658 4736313
17. Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical dimensions of ideomotor apraxia. Alexander MP, Baker E, Naeser MA, Kaplan E, Palumbo C, Brain 1992 115 Pt 1 87 107 1559165
18. Reliability and revision of the nottingham sensory assessment for stroke patients. Lincoln NB, Jackson JM, Adams SA, Physiother 1998 84 358 365 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61454-X (Pubitemid 28401372)
19. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, Spilker J, Holleran R, Eberle R, Hertzberg V, et al. Stroke 1989 20 864 870 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864 2749846 (Pubitemid 19188240)
20. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the american college of sports medicine and the american heart association. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007 39 1435 1445 10.1249/mss. 0b013e3180616aa2 17762378 (Pubitemid 47344027)
21. Optimization of a parallel shoulder mechanism to achieve a high-force, low-mass, robotic-arm exoskeleton. Klein J, Spencer S, Allington J, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ, IEEE Trans Robot 2010 26 710 715
22. Supinator extender (SUE): a pneumatically actuated robot for forearm/wrist rehabilitation after stroke. Allington J, Spencer SJ, Klein J, Buell M, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow J, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011 2011 1579 1582 22254624
23. Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Bobrow JE, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008 16 286 297 18586608 (Pubitemid 351832426)
24. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K, Am J Occup Ther 1985 39 386 391 10.5014/ajot.39.6.386 3160243
25. A standardized approach to the fugl-meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials. See J, Dodakian L, Chou C, Chan V, McKenzie A, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Cramer SC, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013 27 732 741 10.1177/1545968313491000 23774125
26. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the wolf motor function test in patients with subacute stroke. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, Taub E, Giuliani C, Pearson SL, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005 19 194 205 10.1177/1545968305276663 16093410 (Pubitemid 41216295)
27. The motor activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA, Neurology 2006 67 1189 1194 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238164.90657.c2 17030751 (Pubitemid 44563826)
28. Objective quantification of spastic hypertonia: correlation with clinical findings. Katz RT, Rovai GP, Brait C, Rymer WZ, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992 73 339 347 10.1016/0003-9993(92)90007-J 1554307
29. Improvements in speed-based gait classifications are meaningful. Schmid A, Duncan PW, Studenski S, Lai SM, Richards L, Perera S, Wu SS, Stroke 2007 38 2096 2100 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.475921 17510461 (Pubitemid 47012274)
30. Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis. Dewald JP, Beer RF, Muscle Nerve 2001 24 273 283 10.1002/1097-4598(200102)24:2<273::AID-MUS130>3.0.CO;2-Z 11180211 (Pubitemid 32105824)
31. Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, Hahn MG, Sahrmann SA, Edwards DF, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 401 408 10.1682/JRRD.2005. 04.0075 17041825 (Pubitemid 44285647)
32. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Cirstea MC, Levin MF, Brain 2000 123 Pt 5 940 953 10775539 (Pubitemid 30224190)
33. Recovery plateau following stroke: fact or fiction? Demain S, Wiles R, Roberts L, McPherson K, Disabil Rehabil 2006 28 815 821 10.1080/ 09638280500534796 16777768
34. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, Carey LM, Occup Ther Int 2009 16 175 189 10.1002/oti.275 19504501
35. Transfer of training between distinct motor tasks after stroke: implications for task-specific approaches to upper-extremity neurorehabilitation. Schaefer SY, Patterson CB, Lang CE, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013 27 602 612 10.1177/1545968313481279 23549521
36. The resonating arm exerciser: design and pilot testing of a mechanically passive rehabilitation device that mimics robotic active assistance. Zondervan DK, Palafox L, Hernandez J, Reinkensmeyer DJ, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013 10 39 10.1186/1743-0003-10-39 23597303
37. Gait performance and lower-limb muscle strength improved in both upper-limb and lower-limb isokinetic training programs in individuals with chronic stroke. Milot M, Nadeau S, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D, ISRN Rehabilitation 2013 2013 10
38. Klein J, Spencer SJ, Reinkensmeyer DJ: Breaking it down is better: haptic decomposition of complex movements aids in robot-assisted motor learning. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012, 20:268-275.