The EXCITE trial: Attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 194-205

  Wolf, Steven L ^a   Thompson, Paul A ^b   Morris, David M ^c   Rose, Dorian K ^d   Winstein, Carolee J ^d   Taub, Edward ^c   Giuliani, Carol ^e   Pearson, Sonya L ^c  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Function; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FUGL MEYER MOTOR ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WOLF MOTOR FUNCTION TEST;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 24044546139     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968305276663     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton S, et al. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Rep 2003;17:137-52.
2. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW 3rd, Taub E. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:750-5.
3. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1635-29.
4. Wolf SL, Lecraw DE, Barton LA, Jann BB. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989;104:125-32.
5. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med 1993;74:347-54.
6. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, Flor H. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients [Comment]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:624-8.
7. Whitall J, McCombe Waller S, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2390-5.
8. Page SJ, Sisto SA, Levine P, Johnston MV, Hughes M. Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001;38:583-90.
9. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kolbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1374-7.
10. Pierce SR, Gallagher KG, Schaumburg SW, Gershkoff AM, Gaughan JP, Shutter L. Home forced use in an outpatient rehabilitation program for adults with hemiplegia: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neurol Rep 2003;17:214-19.
11. Schaechter JD, Kraft E, Hilliard TS, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neurol Rep 2002;16:326-38.
12. Wittenberg GF, Ishii K, Bushara KO, et al. Constraint-induced therapy in stroke: magnetic stimulation motor maps and cerebral activation. J Neurorehabil Neural Rep 2003;17:48-57.
13. Bonifer N, Anderson KM. Application of constraint-induced movement therapy for an individual with severe chronic upper-extremity hemiplegia. Phys Ther 2003;83:384-98.
14. Wolf S, Binder-MacLeod S. Electromyographic biofeedback applications to the hemiplegic patient. Changes in upper extremity neuromuscular and functional status. Phys Ther 1983;63:1393-403.
15. van der Lee J, Beckerman H, Knol DL, de Vel HW, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 2000;35:1-5.
16. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31.
17. Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor assessment scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:195-7.
18. Malouin F, Picahrd L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1206-12.
19. Chae J, Labatia I, Yang G. Upper limb motor function in hemiparesis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:1-8.
20. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther 1983;63:1606-10.
21. Shrout PR, Fleiss IL. Intraclass correlation: use in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
22. Pohl PS, Winstein CJ, Onla-orm S. Sensory-motor control in the ipsilesional upper extremity alter stroke. Neurorehabilitation 1997;9:57-69.
23. Robinson LM, Fitts SS, Kraft GH. Laterality of performance in finger tapping rate and grip strength by hemisphere of stroke and gender. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:695-8.
24. Carey JR, Baxter TL, Di Fabio KP. Tracking control in the nonparetic hand of subjects with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:435-41.
25. Kauranen K, Vanharanta H. Influences of aging, gender, and handedness on motor performance of upper and lower extremities. Percept Motor Skills 1996;82:515-25.
26. Morrison MW, Gregory RJ, Paul JJ. Reliability of the linger tapping test and a note on sex differences. Percept Motor Skills 1979;48:139-42.
27. Buchman AS, Leurgans S, Gottlieb GL, Chen CH, Almeida GL, Corcos DM. Effect of age and gender in the control of elbow flexion movements. J Motor Behav 2000;32:391-9.
28. Onder G, Penninx BW, Lapuerta P, et al. Change in physical performance over time in older women: the Women's Health and Aging Study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57:M289-93.
29. Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Simonseck EL, Kasper JD, Lafferty ME. The Women's Health and Aging Study. Health and aging characteristics of older women with disability. Bethesda. MD: John's Hopkins Press; 1995.
30. Bohannon R. Relationship between static strength and various other measures in hemiparetic stroke patients. Int Rehabil Med 1987;8:125-8.
31. Robinson LM, Fitts SS, Kraft GH. Laterality of performance in linger tapping rate and grip strength by hemisphere of stroke and gender. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990;71:695-8.