A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: A pilot study

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 81-87

  Krebs, Hermano Igo ^a,b,c,d   Mernoff, Stephen ^e,f   Fasoli, Susan E ^g,h   Hughes, Richard ^g   Stein, Joel ^g,h   Hogan, Neville ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island   (United States)

^f BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g and Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program   (United States)

^h HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Rehabilitation; Robotics; Stroke; Task specific training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; EXPECTATION; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL TRAINING; HAND; HEMIPARESIS; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; LIMB; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); OBJECT MANIPULATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT CARE; PARESIS; PILOT STUDY; RATING SCALE; ROBOTICS; SAMPLE; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SIMULATION; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTEER; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; CHRONIC DISEASE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 44449134779     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/nre-2008-23108     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M.L. Aisen, H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan, F. McDowel and B.T. Volpe, The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke, Arch Neurol 54 (1997), 443-446.
2. L. Dipietro, H.I. Krebs, S.E. Fasoli, B.T. Volpe, J. Stein, C. Bever and N. Hogan, Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke, J Neurophysiology 98 (2007), 757-768.
3. S.D. Fasoli, H.I. Krebs, J. Stein, W.R. Frontera, R. Hughes and N. Hogan, Robotic Therapy for Chronic Motor Impairments after Stroke: Follow-Up Results, Arch of Phys Med and Rehab 85 (2004), 1106-1111.
4. S.D. Fasoli, H.I. Krebs, R. Hughes, J. Stein and N. Hogan, Functionally-Based Rehabilitation: A Next Step? Int J Human-Friendly Welfare Robotic Systems 7(2) (2006), 26-30.
5. M. Ferraro, J.J. Palazzolo, J. Krol, H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan and B.T. Volpe, Robot aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke, Neurology 61 (2003), 1604-1607.
6. A.R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jaasko, I. Leyman, S. Olsson and S. Steglind, The post stroke hemiplegic patient: A method for evaluation of physical performance, Scand J Rehabil Med 7 (1975), 13-31.
7. H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan, M.L. Aisen and B.T. Volpe, Robot-aided neurorehabilitation, IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 6 (1998), 75-87.
8. H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan, M.L. Aisen and B.T. Volpe, Quantization of Continuous Arm Movements in Humans with Brain Injury, Proc Nat Acad of Science 96 (1999), 4645-4649.
9. H.I. Krebs, B.T. Volpe, M. Ferraro, S.D. Fasoli, J. Palazzolo, B. Rohrer, L. Edelstein and N. Hogan, Robot-Aided Neuro-Rehabilitation: From Evidence-Based to Science-Based Rehabilitation, Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 8(4) (2002), 54-70.
10. H.I. Krebs, J.J. Palazzolo, L. Dipietro, M. Ferraro, J. Krol, K. Rannekleiv, B.T. Volpe and N. Hogan, Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy, Autonomous Robots, Kluwer Academics 15 (2003), 7-20.
11. G. Kwakkel, B.J. Kollen and H.I. Krebs, Effects of Robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A Systematic Review, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair [Epub ahead of print].
12. D. Lynch, M. Ferraro, J. Krol, C.M. Trudell, P. Christos and B.T. Volpe, Continuous Passive Motion Improves Shoulder Joint Integrity Following Stroke, Clinical Rehabilitation 19(6) (2005), 594-599.
13. T. Platz, S. van Kaick, L. Möller, S. Freund, T. Winter and I.H. Kim, Impairment-oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: a fTMS study, J Neurol 252 (2005), 1363-1371.
14. G.B. Prange, M.J.A. Jannink, C.J.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, H.J. Hermens and M.J. Ijzerman, Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke, Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development 43(2) (2006), 171-184.
15. B. Rohrer, S.D. Fasoli, H.I. Krebs, B.T. Volpe, W.R. Frontera, J. Stein and N. Hogan, Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery, J Neurosci 22 (18) (2002), 8297-8304.
16. B. Rohrer, S.D. Fasoli, H.I. Krebs, B.T. Volpe, W.R. Frontera, J. Stein and N. Hogan, Submovements Grow Larger, Fewer, and More Blended During Stroke Recovery, Motor Control 8 (2004), 472-483.
17. J. Stein, H.I. Krebs, W.R. Frontera, S.E. Fasoli, R. Hughes and N. Hogan. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke, American J Phys Med Rehab 83(9) (2004), 720-728.
18. B.T. Volpe, H.I. Krebs, N. Hogan, O.L. Edelstein, C. Diels and M. Aisen, A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation, Neurology 54 (2000), 1938-1944.
19. B.T. Volpe, H.I. Krebs and N. Hogan, Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol 14 (2001), 745-752.