Supervised calibration relies on the multisensory percept

Neuron

Volumn 80, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1544-1557

  Zaidel, Adam ^a   Ma, WeiJi ^a,b   Angelaki, Dora E ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MALE; MULTISENSORY PERCEPTION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TASK PERFORMANCE; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84890550637     PISSN: 08966273     EISSN: 10974199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.026     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams W.J., Banks M.S., van Ee R. Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:1063-1064.
2. Adams W.J., Kerrigan I.S., Graf E.W. Efficient visual recalibration from either visual or haptic feedback: the importance of being wrong. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:14745-14749.
3. Alais D., Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:257-262.
4. Black F.O., Paloski W.H., Doxey-Gasway D.D., Reschke M.F. Vestibular plasticity following orbital spaceflight: recovery from postflight postural instability. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 1995, 520:450-454.
5. Block H.J., Bastian A.J. Sensory weighting and realignment: independent compensatory processes. J.Neurophysiol. 2011, 106:59-70.
6. Bremmer F., Duhamel J.R., Ben Hamed S., Graf W. Heading encoding in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Eur. J. Neurosci. 2002, 16:1554-1568.
7. Bubic A., Striem-Amit E., Amedi A. Large-scale brain plasticity following blindness and the use of sensory substitution devices. Multisensory Object Perception in the Primate Brain 2010, 351-380. Springer, New York. M.J. Naumer, J. Kaiser (Eds.).
8. Burge J., Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. J.Vis. 2008, 8:1-19.
9. Burge J., Girshick A.R., Banks M.S. Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability. J.Neurosci. 2010, 30:7714-7721.
10. Burr D., Binda P., Gori M. Multisensory integration and calibration in adults and in children. Sensory Cue Integration 2011, 173-194. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Trommershauser, K. Kording, M.S. Landy (Eds.).
11. Butler J.S., Smith S.T., Campos J.L., Bülthoff H.H. Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading. J.Vis. 2010, 10:23.
12. Chen A., DeAngelis G.C., Angelaki D.E. Convergence of vestibular and visual self-motion signals in an area of the posterior sylvian fissure. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:11617-11627.
13. Doya K. Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2000, 10:732-739.
14. Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429-433.
15. Ernst M.O., Di Luca M. Multisensory perception: from integration to remapping. Sensory Cue Integration 2011, 224-250. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Trommershauser, K. Kording, M.S. Landy (Eds.).
16. Fetsch C.R., Turner A.H., DeAngelis G.C., Angelaki D.E. Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception. J.Neurosci. 2009, 29:15601-15612.
17. Fine I. The behavioral and neurophysiological effects of sensory deprivation. Blindness and Brain Plasticity in Navigation and Object Perception 2008, 127-155. Taylor & Francis, New York. J.J. Rieser, D.H. Ashmead, F.F. Ebner, A.L. Corn (Eds.).
18. Gao J.H., Parsons L.M., Bower J.M., Xiong J., Li J., Fox P.T. Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control. Science 1996, 272:545-547.
19. Gori M., Sandini G., Martinoli C., Burr D. Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of cross-sensory calibration. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:223-225.
20. Gori M., Giuliana L., Sandini G., Burr D. Visual size perception and haptic calibration during development. Dev. Sci. 2012, 15:854-862.
21. Graybiel A.M. The basal ganglia: learning new tricks and loving it. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2005, 15:638-644.
22. Gu Y., Angelaki D.E., Deangelis G.C. Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1201-1210.
23. Haith A., Jackson C., Miall C., Vijayakumar S. Unifying the sensory and motor components of sensorimotor adaptation. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2008, 21:593-600.
24. Hillis J.M., Ernst M.O., Banks M.S., Landy M.S. Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 2002, 298:1627-1630.
25. Judge S.J., Richmond B.J., Chu F.C. Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: an improved method. Vision Res. 1980, 20:535-538.
26. Knill D.C., Pouget A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci. 2004, 27:712-719.
27. Knudsen E.I., Knudsen P.F. Vision calibrates sound localization in developing barn owls. J.Neurosci. 1989, 9:3306-3313.
28. Knudsen E.I., Knudsen P.F. Visuomotor adaptation to displacing prisms by adult and baby barn owls. J.Neurosci. 1989, 9:3297-3305.
29. Lee T.M., Liu H.L., Hung K.N., Pu J., Ng Y.B., Mak A.K., Gao J.H., Chan C.C. The cerebellum's involvement in the judgment of spatial orientation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:1870-1877.
30. Mazzoni P., Krakauer J.W. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J.Neurosci. 2006, 26:3642-3645.
31. Merabet L.B., Rizzo J.F., Amedi A., Somers D.C., Pascual-Leone A. What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6:71-77.
32. Nagano-Saito A., Cisek P., Perna A.S., Shirdel F.Z., Benkelfat C., Leyton M., Dagher A. From anticipation to action, the role of dopamine in perceptual decision making: an fMRI-tyrosine depletion study. J.Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:501-512.
33. Page W.K., Duffy C.J. Heading representation in MST: sensory interactions and population encoding. J.Neurophysiol. 2003, 89:1994-2013.
34. Pascual-Leone A., Amedi A., Fregni F., Merabet L.B. The plastic human brain cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28:377-401.
35. Prsa M., Gale S., Blanke O. Self-motion leads to mandatory cue fusion across sensory modalities. J.Neurophysiol. 2012, 108:2282-2291.
36. Raymond J.L., Lisberger S.G., Mauk M.D. The cerebellum: a neuronal learning machine?. Science 1996, 272:1126-1131.
37. Sadeghi S.G., Minor L.B., Cullen K.E. Neural correlates of sensory substitution in vestibular pathways following complete vestibular loss. J.Neurosci. 2012, 32:14685-14695.
38. Shupak A., Gordon C.R. Motion sickness: advances in pathogenesis, prediction, prevention, and treatment. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2006, 77:1213-1223.
39. Simani M.C., McGuire L.M., Sabes P.N. Visual-shift adaptation is composed of separable sensory and task-dependent effects. J.Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:2827-2841.
40. Smeets J.B., van den Dobbelsteen J.J., de Grave D.D., van Beers R.J., Brenner E. Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:18781-18786.
41. Smith P.F., Curthoys I.S. Mechanisms of recovery following unilateral labyrinthectomy: a review. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 1989, 14:155-180.
42. Sperry R.W. Restoration of vision after crossing of optic nerves and after contralateral transplantation of eye. J.Neurophysiol. 1945, 8:15-28.
43. Taylor J.A., Ivry R.B. Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1001096.
44. van Beers R.J., Wolpert D.M., Haggard P. When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:834-837.
45. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept. Psychophys. 2001, 63:1293-1313.
46. Yuille A.L., Bülthoff H.H. Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics. Perception as Bayesian Inference 1996, Cambridge University Press, New York. D.C. Knill, W. Richards (Eds.).
47. Zaidel A., Turner A.H., Angelaki D.E. Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability. J.Neurosci. 2011, 31:13949-13962.