Efficient visual recalibration from either visual or haptic feedback: The importance of being wrong

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 30, Issue 44, 2010, Pages 14745-14749

  Adams, Wendy J ^a   Kerrigan, Iona S ^a   Graf, Erich W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TOUCH; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CALIBRATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 78049505460     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2749-10.2010     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Adams WJ, Banks MS, van Ee R (2001) Adaptation to three-dimensional distortions in human vision. Nat Neurosci 4:1063-1064.
2. Adams WJ, Graf EW, Ernst MO (2004) Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior. Nat Neurosci 7:1057-1058.
3. Berkeley G (1709) An essay towards a new theory of vision. Dublin: Pepyat. Reprinted in: Works on vision (Turbayne CM, ed), pp 19-97. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963.
4. Bruggeman H, Zosh W, Warren WH (2007) Optic flow drives human visuo-locomotor adaptation. Curr Biol 17:2035-2040.
5. Burge J, Girshick AR, Banks MS (2010) Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability. J Neurosci 30:7714-7721.
6. Champion RA, Adams WJ (2007) Modification of the convexity prior but not the light-from-above prior in visual search with shaded objects. J Vis 7:10.1-10.10.
7. Ebenholtz SM, Wolfson DM (1975) Perceptual aftereffects of sustained convergence. Percept Psychophys 17:485-491.
8. Epstein W (1971) Adaptation to uniocular image magnification after varying preadaptation activities. Am J Psychol 84:66-74.
9. Epstein W (1975) Recalibration by pairing: a process of perceptual learning. Perception 4:59-72.
10. Epstein W, Morgan CL (1970) Adaptation to uniocular image magnification: modification of the disparity-depth relationship. Am J Psychol 83:322-329.
11. Epstein W, Morgan-Paap CL (1974) The effect of level of depth processing and degree of informational discrepancy on adaptation to uniocular image magnification. J Exp Psychol 102:585-594.
12. Fisher SK, Ciuffreda KJ (1990) Adaptation to optically-increased interocular separation under naturalistic viewing conditions. Perception 19:171-180.
13. Fisher SK, Ebenholtz SM (1986) Does perceptual adaptation to telestereoscopically enhanced depth depend on the recalibration of binocular disparity? Percept Psychophys 40:101-109.
14. Gori M, Del Viva M, Sandini G, Burr DC (2008) Young children do not integrate visual and haptic information. Curr Biol 18:694-698.
15. Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS (2002) Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 298:1627-1630.
16. Jacobs RA, Shams L (2010) Visual learning in multisensory environments. Topics Cogn Sci 2:217-225.
17. Kamin LJ (1969) Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In: Punishment and aversive behavior (Campbell BA, Church RM, eds), pp 242-259. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18. Kleffner DA, Ramachandran VS (1992) On the perception of shape from shading. Percept Psychophys 52:18-36.
19. Knill D (2007) Learning Bayesian priors for depth perception. J Vis 7:1-20.
20. Köhler W, Emery DA (1947) Figural after-effects in the third dimension of visual space. Am J Psychol 60:159-201.
21. Martin TA, Keating JG, Goodkin HP, Bastian AJ, Thach WT (1996) Throwing while looking through prisms: II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. Brain 119:1199-1211.
22. Metzger W (1936) The laws of seeing. Reprint (Spillmann L, translator). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.
23. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Classical conditioning II: current research and theory (Black AH, Prokasy WF, eds) pp 64-99. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24. Shanks DR, Darby RJ, Charles D (1998) Resistance to interference in human associative learning: evidence of configural processing. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 24:136-150.
25. Wallach H, Frey K (1972) Adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Percept Psychophys 11:77-83.
26. Wallach H, Moore ME, Davidson L (1963) Modification of stereoscopic depth-perception. Am J Psychol 76:191-204.
27. Wallach H, Frey K, Bode E (1972) The nature of adaptation in distance perception based on oculomotor cues. Percept Psychophys 11:110-116.