Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 31, Issue 39, 2011, Pages 13949-13962

  Zaidel, Adam ^a   Turner, Amanda H ^a   Angelaki, Dora E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAPLORHINI; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CALIBRATION; CUES; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VESTIBULE, LABYRINTH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80053225038     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: 15292401     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2732-11.2011     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alais D, Burr D (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 14:257-262.
2. Atkins JE, Jacobs RA, Knill DC (2003) Experience-dependent visual cue recalibration based on discrepancies between visual and haptic percepts. Vision Res 43:2603-2613.
3. Brainard MS, Knudsen EI (1993) Experience-dependent plasticity in the inferior colliculus: a site for visual calibration of the neural representation of auditory space in the barn owl. J Neurosci 13:4589-4608.
4. Burge J, Girshick AR, Banks MS (2010) Visual-haptic adaptation is determined by relative reliability. J Neurosci 30:7714-7721.
5. Burr D, Gori M (2011) Multisensory integration develops late in humans. In: The neural bases of multisensory processes (Murray MM, Wallace MT, eds), pp 345-362.Boca Raton: CRC.
6. Butler JS, Smith ST, Campos JL, Bulthoff HH (2010) Bayesian integration of visual and vestibular signals for heading. J Vis 10:23.
7. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429-433.
8. Ernst MO, Di Luca M (2011) Multisensory perception: from integration to remapping. In: Sensory cue integration (Trommershauser J, Kording K, Landy MS, eds), pp 224-250. New York: Oxford UP.
9. Fetsch CR, Turner AH, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2009) Dynamic reweighting of visual and vestibular cues during self-motion perception. J Neurosci 29:15601-15612.
10. Gepshtein S, Banks MS (2003) Viewing geometry determines how vision and haptics combine in size perception. Curr Biol 13:483-488.
11. Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI (1997) Computational models of sensorimotor integration. In: Self-organization, computational maps and motor control (Morasso PG, Sanguineti V, eds), pp 117-147.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Gori M, Del Viva M, Sandini G, Burr DC (2008) Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information. Curr Biol 18:694-698.
13. Gori M, Sandini G, Martinoli C, Burr D (2010) Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of crosssensory calibration. Curr Biol 20:223-225.
14. Gu Y, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2007) A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals. Nat Neurosci 10:1038-1047.
15. Gu Y, Angelaki DE, Deangelis GC (2008) Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd. Nat Neurosci 11:1201-1210.
16. Gu Y, Fetsch CR, Adeyemo B, Deangelis GC, Angelaki DE (2010) Decoding of MSTd population activity accounts for variations in the precision of heading perception. Neuron 66:596-609.
17. Guedry FE (1974) Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: The vestibular system (Kornhuber HH, ed), pp 1-154.New York: Springer.
18. Jacobs RA (1999) Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Res 39:3621-3629.
19. Judge SJ, Richmond BJ, Chu FC (1980) Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: an improved method. Vision Res 20:535-538.
20. Jürgens R, Becker W (2006) Perception of angular displacement without landmarks: evidence for Bayesian fusion of vestibular, optokinetic, podokinesthetic, and cognitive information. Exp Brain Res 174:528-543.
21. Knill DC, Pouget A (2004) The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci 27:712-719.
22. Knill DC, Saunders JA (2003) Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Res 43:2539-2558.
23. Knudsen EI (2002) Instructed learning in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl. Nature 417:322-328.
24. Landy MS, Kojima H (2001) Ideal cue combination for localizing texturedefined edges. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18:2307-2320.
25. Lewald J (2002) Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity. Learn Mem 9:268-278.
26. MacNeilage PR, Banks MS, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2010) Vestibularheading discrimination and sensitivity to linear acceleration in head and world coordinates. J Neurosci 30:9084-9094.
27. Ohmi M (1996) Egocentric perception through interaction among many sensory systems. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 5:87-96.
28. Rock I, Victor J (1964) Vision and touch: an experimentally created conflict between the two senses. Science 143:594-596.
29. Scarfe P, Hibbard PB (2011) Statistically optimal integration of biased sensory estimates. J Vis 11:pii:12.
30. Spence C (2009) Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect. Prog Brain Res 176:245-258.
31. van Beers RJ, Sittig AC, Gon JJ (1999) Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. J Neurophysiol 81:1355-1364.
32. van Beers RJ, Wolpert DM, Haggard P (2002) When feeling is more important than seeing in sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Biol 12:834-837.
33. Warren WH, Hannon DJ (1988) Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical-flow. Nature 336:162-163.
34. Watt SJ, Akeley K, Ernst MO, Banks MS (2005) Focus cues affect perceived depth. J Vis 5:834-862.
35. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001a) The psychometric function. I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63:1293-1313.
36. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001b) The psychometric function. II. Bootstrapbased confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys 63: 1314-1329.
37. Witten IB, Knudsen EI (2005) Why seeing is believing: merging auditory and visual worlds. Neuron 48:489-496.
38. Yuille AL, BülthoffHH (1996) Bayesian decision theory and psychophysics. In: Perception as Bayesian inference (Knill DC, Richards W, eds). New York: Cambridge UP.