Visual size perception and haptic calibration during development

Developmental Science

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 854-862

  Gori, Monica ^a   Giuliana, Luana ^b   Sandini, Giulio ^a   Burr, David ^b,c  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85027927616     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.2012.01183.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14 (3), 257-262.
2. Banks, M.S., Aslin, R.N., & Letson, R.D. (1975). Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision. Science, 190 (4215), 675-677.
3. Berkeley, G. (1709). An essay towards a new theory of vision. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merril (1963).
4. Bremner, A.J., Holmes, N.P., & Spence, C. (2008). Infants lost in (peripersonal) space?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (8), 298-305.
5. Brislin, R.W., & Leibowitz, H.W. (1970). The effect of separation between test and comparison objects on size constancy at various age-levels. American Journal of Psychology, 83 (3), 372-376.
6. Brown, L.E., Wilson, E.T., Goodale, M.A., & Gribble, P.L. (2007). Motor force field learning influences visual processing of target motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 27 (37), 9975-9983.
7. Burge, J., Ernst, M.O., & Banks, M.S. (2008). The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. Journal of Vision, 8 (4), 20.
8. Burr, D., & Gori, M. (2011). Multisensory integration develops late in humans. In M.M. Murray & M.T. Wallace (Eds.), Frontiers in the neural bases of multisensory processes (pp. 345-362). London: Taylor & Francis.
9. Carlson, V.R. (1962). Size-constancy judgments and perceptual compromise. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 68-73.
10. Cressman, E.K., & Henriques, D.Y. (2009). Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 102 (6), 3505-3518.
11. Day, R.H., & McKenzie, B.E. (1981). Infant perception of the invariant size of approaching and receding objects. Developmental Psychology, 17, 670-677.
12. Doupe, A.J., & Kuhl, P.K. (1999). Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22, 567-631.
13. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R.J. (1993). An Introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
14. Epstein, W. (1963). Attitudes of judgment and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. Journal oj Experimental Psychology, 66 (1), 78-83.
15. Ernst, M.O., & Banks, M.S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415 (6870), 429-433.
16. Ghahramani, Z., Wolpert, D.M., & Jordan, M.I. (1997). Computational models of sensorimotor integration. In P.G. Morasso & V. Sanguineti (Eds.), Self-organization, computational maps and motor control (pp. 117-147). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
17. Gilinsky, A.S. (1955). The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. American Journal of Psychology, 68 (2), 173-192.
18. Goble, D.J., Lewis, C.A., Hurvitz, E.A., & Brown, S.H. (2005). Development of upper limb proprioceptive accuracy in children and adolescents. Human Movement Science, 24 (2), 155-170.
19. Gori, M., Del Viva, M.M., Sandini, G., & Burr, D.C. (2008). Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information. Current Biology, 18 (9), 694-698.
20. Gori, M., Sandini, G., Martinoli, C., & Burr, D. (2010). Poor haptic orientation discrimination in nonsighted children may reflect disruption of cross-sensory calibration. Current Biology, 20 (3), 223-225.
21. Gori, M., Sciutti, A., Burr, D., & Sandini, G. (2011). Direct and indirect haptic calibration of visual size judgments. PLoSONE, 6 (10), e25599.
22. Gori, M., Tinelli, F., Sandini, G., Cioni, G., & Burr, D. (2012). Impaired visual size-discrimination in children with movement disorders. Neuropsychologia, 50 (8), 1838-1843.
23. Granrud, C.E. (2004). Visual metacognition and the development of size constancy. In D.T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in children and adults (pp. 75-95). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Granrud, C.E. (2006). Size constancy in infants: 4-month-olds' responses to physical versus retinal image size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32 (6), 1398-1404.
25. Granrud, C.E. (2009). Development of size constancy in children: a test of the metacognitive theory. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 71 (3), 644-654.
26. Granrud, C.E., & Schmechel, T.T. (2006). Development of size constancy in children: a test of the proximal mode sensitivity hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics, 68 (8), 1372-1381.
27. Gu, Y., Angelaki, D.E., & Deangelis, G.C. (2008). Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd. Nature Neuroscience, 11 (10), 1201-1210.
28. Hillis, J.M., Watt, S.J., Landy, M.S., & Banks, M.S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4 (12), 967-992.
29. Hubel, D.H., & Wiesel, T.N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 195, 215-243.
30. Knill, D.C., & Saunders, J.A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?Vision Research, 43 (24), 2539-2558.
31. Landy, M.S., Banks, M.S., & Knill, D.C. (2011). Ideal-observer models of cue integration. In J. Trommershaüser, M.S. Landy & K. Körding (Eds.), Book of sensory cue integration (pp. 5-25). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Landy, M.S., & Kojima, H. (2001). Ideal cue combination for localizing texture-defined edges. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics, Image Science, and Vision, 18 (9), 2307-2320.
33. Leibowitz, H.W., Pollard, S.W., & Dickson, D. (1967). Monocular and binocular size-matching as a function of distance at various age-levels. American Journal of Psychology, 80 (2), 263-268.
34. Leibowitz, H.W., Shiina, K., & Hennessy, R.T. (1972). Oculomotor adjustments and size constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 497-500.
35. McKenzie, B.E., Tootell, H.E., & Day, R.H. (1980). Development of visual size constancy during the 1st year of human infancy. Developmental Psychology, 16, 163-174.
36. Mackrous, I., & Proteau, L. (2010). Developmental aspects of pluriarticular movement control. Experimental Brain Research, 204 (1), 21-32.
37. Pickett, K., & Konczak, J. (2009). Measuring kinaesthetic sensitivity in typically developing children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 51 (9), 711-716.
38. Recanzone, G.H. (1998). Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: the ventriloquism aftereffect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95 (3), 869-875.
39. Recanzone, G.H. (2009). Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time. Hearing Research, 258 (1-2), 89-99.
40. Slater, A., Mattock, A., & Brown, E. (1990). Size constancy at birth: newborn infants' responses to retinal and real size. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 314-322.
41. Tassinari, H., Hudson, T.E., & Landy, M.S. (2006). Combining priors and noisy visual cues in a rapid pointing task. Journal of Neuroscience, 26 (40), 10154-10163.
42. Tronick, E., & Hershenson, M. (1979). Size-distance perception in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 27 (1), 166-184.
43. Visser, J., & Geuze, R.H. (2000). Kinaesthetic acuity in adolescent boys: a longitudinal study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 42 (2), 93-96.
44. Watson, A.B., & Pelli, D.G. (1983). QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception and Psychophysics, 33 (2), 113-120.
45. Wozny, D.R., & Shams, L. (2011). Recalibration of auditory space following milliseconds of cross-modal discrepancy. Journal of Neuroscience, 31 (12), 4607-4612.
46. Zaidel, A., Turner, A.H., & Angelaki, D.E. (2011). Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability. Journal of Neuroscience, 31 (39), 13949-13962.
47. Zeigler, H.P., & Leibowitz, H. (1957). Apparent visual size as a function of distance for children and adults. American Journal of Psychology, 70 (1), 106-109.