Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size

European Radiology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 256-264

  Fallenberg, E M ^a   Dromain, C ^b   Diekmann, F ^c   Engelken, F ^a   Krohn, M ^a   Singh, J M ^a   Ingold Heppner, B ^a   Winzer, K J ^a   Bick, U ^a   Renz, D M ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^c St Joseph Stift Bremen ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Breast; Cancer; Contrast media; Contrast enhanced spectral mammography; MRI

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; GADOBUTROL; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE;

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SIZE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDULLARY CARCINOMA; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REIMBURSEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE;

EID: 84890431342     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3007-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165-175
2. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773-1783
3. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH et al (2011) Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 260:658-663
4. Allen SA, Cunliffe WJ, Gray J et al (2001) Pre-operative estimation of primary breast cancer size: a comparison of clinical assessment, mammography and ultrasound. Breast 10:299-305
5. Fasching PA, Heusinger K, Loehberg CR et al (2006) Influence of mammographic density on the diagnostic accuracy of tumor size assessment and association with breast cancer tumor characteristics. Eur J Radiol 60:398-404
6. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888
7. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM et al (2003) MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:333-341
8. Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG, O'Dell CA, Brekke CE (2008) Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging. Am J Surg 196:389-397
9. Schell AM, Rosenkranz K, Lewis PJ (2009) Role of breast MRI in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1438-1444
10. Mann RM, Loo CE, Wobbes T et al (2010) The impact of preoperative breastMRI on the re-excision rate in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 119:415-422
11. Mann RM, Veltman J, Barentsz JO, Wobbes T, Blickman JG, Boetes C (2008) The value of MRI compared to mammography in the assessment of tumour extent in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:135-142
12. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C (2008) Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol 18:1307-1318
13. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S et al (2006) Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:W528-537
14. Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S et al (2011) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 21:565-574
15. Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F et al (2012) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res 14:R94
16. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296-1316
17. Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S et al (2011) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 78:112-121
18. Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 228:842-850
19. Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ (2003) Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 229:261-268
20. Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F, Muller S, Hamm B, Bick U (2005) Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol 40:397-404
21. Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266:743- 751
22. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Adler G, Garbay JR, Delaloge S (2009) Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 69:34- 42
23. Lee AH, Dublin EA, Bobrow LG, Poulsom R (1998) Invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast show distinct patterns of vascular endothelial growth factor expression and angiogenesis. J Pathol 185:394-401
24. Teifke A, Hlawatsch A, Beier Tet al (2002) Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T. Radiology 224:881-888
25. Jansen SA, Paunesku T, Fan X et al (2009) Ductal carcinoma in situ: X-ray fluorescence microscopy and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging reveals gadolinium uptake within neoplastic mammary ducts in a murine model. Radiology 253:399-406
26. Wiener E, Woertler K, Weirich G, Rummeny EJ, Settles M (2007) Contrast enhanced cartilage imaging: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents. Eur J Radiol 63:110-119
27. Singletary SE (2002) Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am J Surg 184:383-393
28. McGhan LJ, Wasif N, Gray RJ et al (2010) Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for invasive lobular cancer: good, better, but maybe not the best? Ann Surg Oncol 17(Suppl 3):255-262
29. Wasif N, Garreau J, Terando A, Kirsch D, Mund DF, Giuliano AE (2009) MRI versus ultrasonography and mammography for preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Am Surg 75:970-975
30. Mann RM, Hoogeveen YL, Blickman JG, Boetes C (2008) MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107:1-14
31. Behjatnia B, Sim J, Bassett LW, Moatamed NA, Apple SK (2010) Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 3:303-309